DUE TO SPAM, SIGN-UP IS DISABLED. Goto Selfserve wiki signup and request an account.
...
This page is under construction so please feel invited to add any differences that you are aware of
OpenCSA JIRAs
http://www.osoa.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa
General
Feature | OSOA Ref | OSOA Description | OASIS Ref | OASIS Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Schema namespace |
|
|
Assembly
OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_AssemblyModel_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev3 + Current JIRA
OASIS JIRA | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
for implentations.*'s fix attributes that should show qnames as values |
| |
Is binding.sca always present? |
| |
Is interface.java specification normative in SCA-Assembly spec? |
| |
usage of not promoted references |
| |
SCA <anyAttribute.../> declarations should use namespace ##other rather than ##any |
| |
Can Implementation change property values after instantiaion |
| |
Missing XSD for contributions |
| |
Clarify whether a Default Value for a Property must appear inthe componentType of an implementation |
| |
Permit intents and PolicySets on <interface/> elements |
| |
Autowire at the domain level |
| |
Autowire value for the logical domain composite |
| |
Unresolved bindings on references |
| |
Component Type file name is too restrictive |
| |
ComponentType Properties should not have a source |
| |
Confusing words in Section 5.3 relating to ConversationalIntent |
| |
"SCA schema fixes requested for sca-core.xsd (based on OSOA site versions that may be copied to OASIS site)" | ||
Description elements in SCDL |
| |
No schema or extension model definitions for contributions |
| |
component type allows to specify wire targets on references |
| |
Assembly Specification should not state what marks a Javainterface as Local |
| |
Implementation.composite pseudo-schema incorrect |
| |
Conflicting Specification of Values for Many-Valued StringProperties |
| |
WSDL extension should not be required for conversations |
| |
XSD definitions of Component Service and Component Referencehave unintended features |
| |
Specification wording unclear on how local and remoteable interfaces are specified |
| |
Constraining Type talks about non-optional references but does not define what they are |
| |
How to map WSDL 1.1. portType to WSDL 2.0 interface and vice versa? |
| |
Language neutrality edits |
| |
some smaller things we need to fix in the assembly specification |
| |
Need to clarify definition of Bidirectional Interfaces |
| |
Conflicting domain-level <wire> deployments |
| |
Identifying wire format and operation selection |
| |
What is the default value for many and mustSupply on Properties? |
| |
SCA Composite Visibility |
| |
Composite Completeness |
| |
Compatability of component type side files |
| |
Allow multiple definitions.xml files |
| |
Need for a Callback annotation for WSDL interface files |
| |
Component URI is not well described |
| |
SCDL artifact resolution underspecified |
| |
Need to define Namespace handling for included Composites |
| |
Incorrect description of <Operation/> child elements inAssembly |
| |
Long-Running Request-Response Operations |
| |
Add a Section documenting naming conventions to the start ofthe SCA Assembly Specification |
| |
Corrections to the contributions schema |
| |
Duplicated atributes in sca-binding-sca.xsd and sca-implementation-composite.xsd |
| |
"Section on ""Wire"" in Appendix is Incorrect" |
| |
Do we need appendix A (pseudo-schema)? |
|
General
Feature | OSOA Ref | OSOA Description | OASIS Ref | OASIS Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Schema namespace |
|
|
Assembly
OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_AssemblyModel_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev3 + Current JIRA
Test | Feature | OASIS Ref | OASIS Change
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Properties | Specification of multi-value string properties | |||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Java
OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_JavaAnnotationsAndAPIs_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01
...
OASIS JIRA | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
intents names defined by SCA should be defined using camel case |
| |
How are mayProvide intents on bindings satisfied |
| |
Clarify scope of ordered intent |
| |
Limit policySet attachment to bindings |
| |
Remove <operation/> elements from the specification |
| |
Intents which conflict with binding configuration |
| |
Clarify the handling of Intents |
| |
Wire validation rules have changed |
| |
How do we tell what a policySet @provides? |
| |
Policy algorithm gets required intents from what interfaces definitions/declarations? |
| |
How to configure policySets |
| |
Need a clear way to distinguish Implementation Intents from Interaction Intents |
| |
Infoset for policySet/@appliesTo |
| |
Fix SCA Policy schema complex types for Qualifier and PolicySet |
| |
Need Support for Mutually exclusive intents |
| |
Improve description of the overides available to the two different hierarchies in SCA |
| |
The URL for the location of the ws-policy.xsd is incorrect. |
| |
Need more precision on when policies in a policySet are in effect |
| |
Security implementation policy should be validate-able by schema |
| |
More direct, structural qualifier definition |
| |
Profile intent extension - provides other intents |
| |
Should qualifiable intents have a default qualifier |
| |
Need Transaction Policy Spec |
| |
External mechanism for attaching intents or policySets |
| |
Include definition on 'conversational' intent as mentioned in SCA Assembly |
| |
Implicit addition of intents based on a service or reference's @requires list |
|
Bindings
OASIS JIRA | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
Clarify use of URI vs. uri |
| |
Does WSDL binding take precedend over policy intents |
| |
Allow topics anywhere that queues can be used |
| |
Clarify default function selection and data binding behavior |
| |
Correlation property names are odd, and the space of options is not extensible. |
| |
JMS binding pseudo-schemas inconsistent with assembly |
| |
JMS binding URI should follow JMS IRI scheme submitted to IETF |
| |
Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.binding with reference targets |
| |
Clarify the rules on which queues are used for responses and callbacks |
| |
Rules for Binding compatibility |
| |
binding.ws reference to assembly spec for interface mapping is incorrect |
| |
Namespace/location for WS-Addressing is incorrect in WebService binding spec/XSD |
| |
What namespace(s) do we use for each binding? |
| |
Are JMS message selectors supported? |
| |
Rules for WSDL generation create invalid WSDL by using "/" where it is not allowed. |
| |
Use of wsdli:wsdlLocation does not match WSDL 2.0 specification |
| |
No bindingType for binding.ws |
| |
JMS bindingType and conversation intent |
| |
JMS bindingType and atLeastOne intent overlaps with setting JMSDeliveryMode |
| |
portType referred to inconsistently throughout specification |
| |
JMSDeliveryMode, JMSTimeToLive and JMSPriority defined as types different from what the JMS specification uses. |
|