DUE TO SPAM, SIGN-UP IS DISABLED. Goto Selfserve wiki signup and request an account.
...
OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_AssemblyModel_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev3 + Current JIRA
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY![]()
| OASIS JIRA | Description | Tuscany TODO |
|---|---|---|---|
| for implentations.*'s fix attributes that should show qnames as values |
| |
| Is binding.sca always present? |
| |
| Is interface.java specification normative in SCA-Assembly spec? |
| |
| usage of not promoted references |
| |
| SCA <anyAttribute.../> declarations should use namespace ##other rather than ##any |
| |
| Can Implementation change property values after instantiaion |
| |
| Missing XSD for contributions |
| |
| Clarify whether a Default Value for a Property must appear inthe componentType of an implementation |
| |
| Permit intents and PolicySets on <interface/> elements |
| |
| Autowire at the domain level |
| |
| Autowire value for the logical domain composite |
| |
| Unresolved bindings on references |
| |
| Component Type file name is too restrictive |
| |
| ComponentType Properties should not have a source |
| |
| Confusing words in Section 5.3 relating to ConversationalIntent |
| |
| "SCA schema fixes requested for sca-core.xsd (based on OSOA site versions that may be copied to OASIS site)" |
| |
| Description elements in SCDL |
| |
| No schema or extension model definitions for contributions |
| |
| component type allows to specify wire targets on references |
| |
| Assembly Specification should not state what marks a Javainterface as Local |
| |
| Implementation.composite pseudo-schema incorrect |
| |
| Conflicting Specification of Values for Many-Valued StringProperties |
| |
| WSDL extension should not be required for conversations |
| |
| XSD definitions of Component Service and Component Referencehave unintended features |
| |
| Specification wording unclear on how local and remoteable interfaces are specified |
| |
| Constraining Type talks about non-optional references but does not define what they are |
| |
| How to map WSDL 1.1. portType to WSDL 2.0 interface and vice versa? |
| |
| Language neutrality edits |
| |
| some smaller things we need to fix in the assembly specification |
| |
| Need to clarify definition of Bidirectional Interfaces |
| |
| Conflicting domain-level <wire> deployments |
| |
| Identifying wire format and operation selection |
| |
| What is the default value for many and mustSupply on Properties? |
| |
| SCA Composite Visibility |
| |
| Composite Completeness |
| |
| Compatability of component type side files |
| |
| Allow multiple definitions.xml files |
| |
| Need for a Callback annotation for WSDL interface files |
| |
| Component URI is not well described |
| |
| SCDL artifact resolution underspecified |
| |
| Need to define Namespace handling for included Composites |
| |
| Incorrect description of <Operation/> child elements inAssembly |
| |
| Long-Running Request-Response Operations |
| |
| Add a Section documenting naming conventions to the start ofthe SCA Assembly Specification |
| |
| Corrections to the contributions schema |
| |
| Duplicated atributes in sca-binding-sca.xsd and sca-implementation-composite.xsd |
| |
| "Section on ""Wire"" in Appendix is Incorrect" | Tuscany already has the correct model, No action is required | |
| Do we need appendix A (pseudo-schema)? | No action is required |
...
OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_JavaAnnotationsAndAPIs_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA![]()
OASIS JIRA | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
Spurious cast() method definition in ComponentContext interface |
| |
Constructor name information may not be available |
| |
Java CAA spec does not contain the interface.java schema |
| |
Incorrect definition of the SCA JEE JSP Tag library |
| |
Inconsistent use of a and an when referring to annotations |
| |
Normative references to SCA Spec docs point to v1.00 docs |
| |
Missing word "type" for "return type" in CAA spec - sec 3.1 |
| |
Incorrect description of @Scope annotation default |
| |
Incorrect reference to "original request" |
| |
Should not say callback ID is passed in reference parameters |
| |
Incorrect code in section 6.7.2 example |
| |
SCA Spring C & I specification does not state the purpose of sca:composite element |
| |
Describe the concurrency model for each scope |
| |
SCA Spring Client and Implementation Specification uses an unacceptable namespace |
| |
When more than one interface with the same unqualified name used in the @Service annotation |
| |
SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define the ComponentType of a Java implementation |
| |
Version requirements for SDO, JAXB and JAX-WS |
| |
@Callback annotation does not feature in section on Interfaces |
| |
Missing description of what the @EagerInit annotation does |
| |
@Reference annotation can also be used on a constructor parameter. |
| |
Incorrect examples of methods annotated @Init and @Destroy |
| |
Inconsistent method description for @Init and @Destroy annotations |
| |
Incorrect generated service name |
| |
Clarify Request Scope lifetime |
| |
annotations on parameters |
| |
EJB remove method on EJBHome |
|
...
OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_Policy_Framework_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-policy-11.1-spec-wd-10
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY![]()
OASIS JIRA | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
intents names defined by SCA should be defined using camel case |
| |
How are mayProvide intents on bindings satisfied |
| |
Clarify scope of ordered intent |
| |
Limit policySet attachment to bindings |
| |
Remove <operation/> elements from the specification |
| |
Intents which conflict with binding configuration |
| |
Clarify the handling of Intents |
| |
Wire validation rules have changed |
| |
How do we tell what a policySet @provides? |
| |
Policy algorithm gets required intents from what interfaces definitions/declarations? |
| |
How to configure policySets |
| |
Need a clear way to distinguish Implementation Intents from Interaction Intents |
| |
Infoset for policySet/@appliesTo |
| |
Fix SCA Policy schema complex types for Qualifier and PolicySet |
| |
Need Support for Mutually exclusive intents |
| |
Improve description of the overides available to the two different hierarchies in SCA |
| |
The URL for the location of the ws-policy.xsd is incorrect. |
| |
Need more precision on when policies in a policySet are in effect |
| |
Security implementation policy should be validate-able by schema |
| |
More direct, structural qualifier definition |
| |
Profile intent extension - provides other intents |
| |
Should qualifiable intents have a default qualifier |
| |
Need Transaction Policy Spec |
| |
External mechanism for attaching intents or policySets |
| |
Include definition on 'conversational' intent as mentioned in SCA Assembly |
| |
Implicit addition of intents based on a service or reference's @requires list |
|
Bindings
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS![]()
OASIS JIRA | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
Clarify use of URI vs. uri |
| |
Does WSDL binding take precedend over policy intents |
| |
Allow topics anywhere that queues can be used |
| |
Clarify default function selection and data binding behavior |
| |
Correlation property names are odd, and the space of options is not extensible. |
| |
JMS binding pseudo-schemas inconsistent with assembly |
| |
JMS binding URI should follow JMS IRI scheme submitted to IETF |
| |
Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.binding with reference targets |
| |
Clarify the rules on which queues are used for responses and callbacks |
| |
Rules for Binding compatibility |
| |
binding.ws reference to assembly spec for interface mapping is incorrect |
| |
Namespace/location for WS-Addressing is incorrect in WebService binding spec/XSD |
| |
What namespace(s) do we use for each binding? |
| |
Are JMS message selectors supported? |
| |
Rules for WSDL generation create invalid WSDL by using "/" where it is not allowed. |
| |
Use of wsdli:wsdlLocation does not match WSDL 2.0 specification |
| |
No bindingType for binding.ws |
| |
JMS bindingType and conversation intent |
| |
JMS bindingType and atLeastOne intent overlaps with setting JMSDeliveryMode |
| |
portType referred to inconsistently throughout specification |
| |
JMSDeliveryMode, JMSTimeToLive and JMSPriority defined as types different from what the JMS specification uses. |
|
BPEL
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL![]()
OASIS JIRA | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
SCA-BPEL spec can not require bpel:mustUnderstand to be true |
| |
SCA-BPEL XML Schema |
| |
Allow Component Type side file to override defaults for service/reference |
| |
Allow sca-aware processes to specify everything that can be specified in a CT side file |
| |
ComponentType should not contain implementation.bpel |
| |
test issue please ignore |
| |
SCA-BPEL XML Namespaces |
| |
Correlation disagreement between SCA and BPEL |
| |
Does the spec allow a componentType side file |
| |
support for BPEL4WS 1.1 |
|