Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

(tick)  

ASSEMBLY-43

for implentations.*'s fix attributes that should show qnames as values

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-1

Is binding.sca always present?

If a component service is configured with binding.ws, can be accessed by a component reference in the same composite with binding.sca?

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-3

Is interface.java specification normative in SCA-Assembly spec?

No action is required

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-6

usage of not promoted references

Make sure the reference resolution follows what's described by the assembly spec

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-23

SCA <anyAttribute.../> declarations should use namespace ##other rather than ##any

Update the xsd from OASIS

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-25

Can Implementation change property values after instantiaion

No action is required

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-28

Missing XSD for contributions

Update the xsd from OASIS. Update the Import/Export model to
be extensible as the XSD allows xsd:any and xsd:anyAttribute

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-38

Clarify whether a Default Value for a Property must appear inthe componentType of an implementation

No action is required

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-39

Permit intents and PolicySets on <interface/> elements

The policy model needs to be changed so that interface can have intents/policySets attached.

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-40

Autowire at the domain level

Tuscany needs to decide if/how it will support the domain-level autowiring

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-42

Autowire value for the logical domain composite

I think Tuscany is OK here as the autowire=false for the domain composite

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-57

Unresolved bindings on references

Add the support for "componentName/serviceName/bindingName" as the wire target

  

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-67

Component Type file name is too restrictive

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-68

ComponentType Properties should not have a source

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-35

Confusing words in Section 5.3 relating to ConversationalIntent

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-32

"SCA schema fixes requested for sca-core.xsd (based on OSOA site versions that may be copied to OASIS site)"

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-60

Description elements in SCDL

Support documentation element in the model and processors

  

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-53

No schema or extension model definitions for contributions

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-5

component type allows to specify wire targets on references

Push teh getTargets() method from Reference to ComponentReference

  

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-92

Assembly Specification should not state what marks a Javainterface as Local

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-71

Implementation.composite pseudo-schema incorrect

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-14

Conflicting Specification of Values for Many-Valued StringProperties

Adjust the property value processing to conform to the new syntax

  

(question)

ASSEMBLY-22

WSDL extension should not be required for conversations

Make sure conversational intent is supported at interface and service

  

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-18

XSD definitions of Component Service and Component Referencehave unintended features

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-63

Specification wording unclear on how local and remoteable interfaces are specified

Remotable is IDL specific

  

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-65

Constraining Type talks about non-optional references but does not define what they are

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-77

How to map WSDL 1.1. portType to WSDL 2.0 interface and vice versa?

Remove the wsdl2.0 specfics from sca namespace. Potentially add interface.wsdl2 under tuscany ns

  

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-69

Language neutrality edits

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-45

some smaller things we need to fix in the assembly specification

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-56

Need to clarify definition of Bidirectional Interfaces

Make sure Tuscany is consistent with the specified behavior

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-41

Conflicting domain-level <wire> deployments

Tuscany needs to implement the proposal

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-79

Identifying wire format and operation selection

add "wireFormat" and "operationSelector" for bindings

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-62

What is the default value for many and mustSupply on Properties?

remove "mustSupply" from <component>

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-26

SCA Composite Visibility

This seems to be a clarification by the spec

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-51

Composite Completeness

Tuscany needs to add more validations to ensure the completeness of the composite for implementaiton.composite

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-36

Compatability of component type side files

Each implementation type has to decide how to support the componentType file

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-44

Allow multiple definitions.xml files

Tuscany should allow META-INF/definitions.xml from SCA contributions. These definitions become visible to the SCA domain

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-89

Need for a Callback annotation for WSDL interface files

Tuscany needs to handle sca:callback extensibility elements in WSDL

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-16

Component URI is not well described

Tuscany needs to support the structural URI based on this proposal

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-8

SCDL artifact resolution underspecified

Adjust the artifact resolution based on the proposal in this JIRA

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-17

Need to define Namespace handling for included Composites

Tuscany needs to adjust how the composite include is aggregated based on the proposal in this JIRA

 

(minus)

ASSEMBLY-30

Incorrect description of <Operation/> child elements inAssembly

I see this conflicts with  http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-58

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-33

Long-Running Request-Response Operations

Tuscany needs to support the proposal

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-96

Add a Section documenting naming conventions to the start ofthe SCA Assembly Specification

No action is required

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-74

Corrections to the contributions schema

See ASSEMLY-28

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-81

Duplicated atributes in sca-binding-sca.xsd and sca-implementation-composite.xsd

No action is required

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-75

"Section on ""Wire"" in Appendix is Incorrect"

Tuscany already has the correct model, No action is required

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-72

Do we need appendix A (pseudo-schema)?

No action is required

 

Java

OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_JavaAnnotationsAndAPIs_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01

...