...
JIRA | Description | Comments | Status | ||||
TUSCANY-2680 | Domain: Webapp scenario | This issue is for Domain Manager, nothing releated to Spring | N/A | ||||
TUSCANY-2875 | Unannotated spring context's are not interpreted correctly w.r.t references vs properties |
| DONE | ||||
TUSCANY-2779 | The problem of catch spring implementation's Exception |
| DONE | ||||
TUSCANY-2550 | Ensure Spring Implementation works with binding.sca/jsonrpc/rss/atom |
| DONE | ||||
TUSCANY-2771 | spring implementation issue migrating from 1.3 to 1.4 |
| DONE | ||||
TUSCANY-2642 | Spring SCA Reference does not get resolved in multiple context scenario |
| DONE | ||||
TUSCANY-2909 | Introspecting Private Fields for Spring Pojo Beans |
| DONE | ||||
TUSCANY-2911 | Mapping references with constructor-arg type attribute |
| DONE | ||||
TUSCANY-2258 | Spring Implementation support of Services isn't compliant with the Specification | Specs JIRA: JAVA-58 & JAVA-59 | Action Pending from Specs | ||||
TUSCANY-2503 | Spring implementation doesn't see spring beans |
|
| ||||
TUSCANY-1486 | Support Stateful Spring Beans and Conversational interaction |
|
| ||||
TUSCANY-2642 | Spring SCA Reference does not get resolved in multiple context scenario |
|
| TUSCANY-2162 | Spring SCA specification should accomodate common beans/aspects used by different composites/components |
|
|
TUSCANY-2787 | Composite doesn't deploy with Domain Manager |
|
| ||||
TUSCANY-2909 | Introspecting Private Fields for Spring Pojo Beans |
|
| ||||
TUSCANY-2911 | Mapping references with constructor-arg type attribute |
|
|