Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Advantages were wrong - spamc/spampd can be safe, but still not as good.

...

Let's try the hard way to secure our mailsystems. Not as convenient as using spamd and spamc is the approach mentioned in the postfix FilterReadme. Some guys at http://www.WorldDesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm have published a spamd replacement that works as a SMTP-proxy. The advantage over spamd/spamc is that problems with either PERL, Spamassassin or it's configuration don't lead to lost mail. The SMTP-proxy is designed to reject mail in case of non-recoverable faultsefficiency (no fork/exec()ed processes or temporary files required for failsafe operation) and the ability to use before-queue content filtering.

It can easily be integrated as a "content_filter" in postfix. The knack is, that mail classified as spam is forwarded to users, where the filter of their local eMail client should detect the spam-status. Goal should be to forward spam to a special user named "spamking". This could be done by using an alias-map for all users that like their spam removed. The solution described here is for a Mail-server with a limited number of users with varying knowledge. All users are "local", meaning they get their mail via POP/IMAP from the mailserver.

...