THIS IS A TEST INSTANCE. ALL YOUR CHANGES WILL BE LOST!!!!
| Table of Contents |
|---|
Status
Current state: Under Discussion Draft
Discussion thread: here [Change the link from the KIP proposal email archive to your own email thread]
...
Public Interfaces
We plan to change the value `value` field of the class to be `Optional<String>` to make it explicitly to the caller that it might well be null. And change the `value()` method to return an `Optional<String>` as well.
...
We plan to change the type of the value field to be an Optional `Optional<String>` which requires us to also change the getter, `equals` and `hashCode` method.
...
Various callers that uses the constructor and getter will need to be changed to account for the change in type.