Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Code Block
languagejava
titleISslContextFactory
package org.apache.cassandra.security;

import javax.net.ssl.SSLContext;
import javax.net.ssl.SSLException;

import io.netty.handler.ssl.CipherSuiteFilter;
import io.netty.handler.ssl.SslContext;
import org.apache.cassandra.config.EncryptionOptions;

/**
 * The purpose of this interface is to provide pluggable mechanism for creating custom JSSE and Netty SSLContext
 * objects. Please use the Cassandra configuration key {@code ssl_context_factory} and provide a custom class-name
 * implementing this interface with parameters to be used to plugin a your own way to load the SSLContext.
 *
 * Implementation of this interface must have a constructor with argument of type {@code Map<String,String>} to allow
 * custom parameters to be passed from the Cassandra yaml configuration.
 *
 * Since on top of Netty, Cassandra is internally using JSSE SSLContext also for certain use-cases- this interface
 * has methods for both.
 *
 * Below is an example of how to configure a custom implementation with parameters
 * <pre>
 *ssl_context_factory:
 *       class_name: org.apache.cassandra.security.YourSslContextFactoryImpl
 *       parameters:
 *         key1: "value1"
 *         key2: "value2"
 *         key3: "value3"
 * </pre>
 */
public interface ISslContextFactory
{
    /**
     * Creates JSSE SSLContext.
     *
     * @param options EncryptionOptions that could be used for the SSL context creation
     * @param buildTruststore {@code true} if the caller requires Truststore; {@code false} otherwise
     * @return
     * @throws SSLException in case the Ssl Context creation fails for some reason
     */
    SSLContext createJSSESslContext(EncryptionOptions options, boolean buildTruststore) throws SSLException;

    /**
     * Creates Netty's SslContext object.
     *
     * @param options EncryptionOptions that could be used for the SSL context creation
     * @param buildTruststore {@code true} if the caller requires Truststore; {@code false} otherwise
     * @param socketType {@link SocketType} for Netty's Inbound or Outbound channels
     * @param useOpenSsl {@code true} if openSsl is enabled;{@code false} otherwise
     * @param cipherFilter to allow Netty's cipher suite filtering, e.g.
     * {@link io.netty.handler.ssl.SslContextBuilder#ciphers(Iterable, CipherSuiteFilter)}
     * @return
     * @throws SSLException in case the Ssl Context creation fails for some reason
     */
    SslContext createNettySslContext(EncryptionOptions options, boolean buildTruststore, SocketType socketType,
                                     boolean useOpenSsl, CipherSuiteFilter cipherFilter) throws SSLException;

    /**
     * Initializes hot reloading of the security keys/certs. The implementation must guarantee this to be thread safe.
     * @param options Client encryption options (Native Protocol)
     * @throws SSLException
     */
    void initHotReloading(EncryptionOptions options) throws SSLException;
    /**
     * Returns if any changes require the reloading of the SSL context returned by this factory.
     * This will be called by Cassandra's periodic polling for any potential changes that will reload the SSL context
     * . However only newer connections established after the reload will use the reloaded SSL context.
     * @return
     */
    boolean shouldReload();

   /**
     * Returns if this factory uses private keystore.
     * @param options Encryption options
     * @return {@code true} by default unless the implementation overrides this
     */
    default boolean hasKeystore(EncryptionOptions options) {
        return true;
    }

    /**
     * Indicates if the process holds the inbound/listening end of the socket ({@link SSLFactory.SocketType#SERVER})), or the
     * outbound side ({@link SSLFactory.SocketType#CLIENT}).
     */
    enum SocketType {
        SERVER, CLIENT;
    }
}

Important note about common SSL configurations 

Currently the EncryptionOptions contains the keystore/truststore paths and other important SSL configuration parameters for the SSL connection (like ciphers, ssl protocol version, client-auth-required flag, endpoint verification flag etc). These "other important" configuration options we refer as the "common SSL configurations" in the title here.

Any implementation of the ISslContextFactory would still need to use these common configurations AND may require additional configuration parameters of their own. Since we are going to modify EncryptionOption to have one more option to define the pluggable implementation for the ISslContextFacgtory, this raises couple of questions which we need to address in terms of design-

  1. Should not ideally we move out the keystore/truststore out of the EncryptionOption and may be define a parent class like CommonEncryptionOption?
    1. Response: Ideally yes. While it is little weird to have conflicting configuration options in the EncryptionOption (i.e. file based keystore/truststore paths and pluggable sslcontext factory which mostly intended toward not using file based artifacts), practically we could still live with little imperfection. However we will be open to discuss if the community members feel it is best to have a parent class to move out 'common' ssl configurations between file based and pluggable sslcontext factory.
    2. Above stated reason results into the current design of the interface which requires EncryptionOptions to be passed to most of it's methods because the implementation needs to know the "common SSL configurations".
  2. Should we move to model of having Map<String,String> type as passing all the SSL configuration options to any implementation of the ISslContextFactory including the Default one?
    1. Yes we could do that but for that we would have to "copy" all the common SSL configurations to the Map<String,String> while creating the instance of the ISslContextFactory's implementation including the Default one. This would also help make the imperfection of not adding CommonEncryptionOption suggested in the 1st question.
    2. Again, we would need community's input on the preference.

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

...