Status

Current state: "Under Discussion"

...

Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

Single Message Transforms (SMT), KIP-66, have greatly improved Connector's usability by enabling processing input/output data without the need for additional streaming applications. These benefits have been limited as most SMT implementations are limited to fields available on the root structure:

...

Therefore, this KIP is aimed to include support for nested structures on the existing SMTs — where this make sense —, and to include the abstractions to reuse this in future SMTs.

Public Interfaces

From the existing list of SMTs, there are the following to be impacted by this change:

...

• Drop: Drop the whole key or value.
• Filter: Drops whole message based on predicate.
• InsertHeader: Insert specific message to header.
• RegerRouter: Acts on topic name.
• SetSchemaMetadata: Acts on root schema.
• TimestampRouter: Acts on timestamp.

Proposed Changes

Nested notation

Dotted notation nested.key tends to be the most natural way to describe nested fields as part of the configuration. Though, schemaless (Map<String, Object) records can have dotted notation included on their field names (e.g. { 'nested.key': { 'val':42 } }).

As the scenarios where dotted notation is used on JSON message could be rare, this KIP proposed to stick with dots as separators.

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

Existing SMT configurations should work fine unless they are using schemaless JSON records relying on dotted notation. This will need to be assessed as part of the KIP discussion.

...

Renaming fields SMT could also be used as a workaround to replace dot-named fields on JSON messages.

Rejected Alternatives

If there are alternative ways of accomplishing the same thing, what were they? The purpose of this section is to motivate why the design is the way it is and not some other way.