Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Licensing and other issues

  • Wiki Markup*_TODO: IIRC we resolved this and should probably document this here, too._* Need to have discussion on how to handle provisional OSGi APIs in our releases. It is not clear if we should include provisional OSGi API since it is not officially released by the OSGi Alliance and is therefore subject to change and/or not always officially sanctioned (i.e., made publicly available by the OSGi Alliance). At a minimum, we need to define an approach to informing users if provisional API is included that it is not \[yet\] official OSGi APIRegarding the issue raised in last board report of how to handle provisional OSGi API in Felix bundles, we have decided for now that the best approach is to avoid it and use our own parallel API structure or subclassing where appropriate. The OSGi provisional policy is documented at http://felix.apache.org/site/provisional-osgi-api-policy.htmlImage Added in our developer documentation.