...

Discussion thread: here [Change the link from the KIP proposal email archive to your own email thread]

JIRA: here [Change the link from KAFKA-1 to your own ticket]

Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

, we optimize the beginQuorumEpochRequest timeout, 

The controller quorum fetch loop relies on a timing invariant for correctness and liveness: the Raft maximum fetch wait(currently effectively bounded hardcode to ~500 500 ms) must be significantly smaller than half of the controller.quorum.fetch.timeout.ms after KAFKA-16926.

In practice, the algorithm makes progress because:

raft_max_fetch_wait (

...

500 ms)  <<  controller.quorum.fetch.timeout.

...

ms  / 2

If operators set an unusually small controller.quorum.fetch.timeout.ms, this invariant can be violated, risking premature timeouts, spurious retries, and degraded stability. To preserve the invariant across configurations and upgrades, we propose to enforce a lower bound of 1000 ms for controller.quorum.fetch.timeout.ms.

Public Interfaces

Configuration change (validation only):

• controller.quorum.fetch.timeout.ms

  • Type: int (ms)

  • Lower bound: 1000 ms (enforced)

  • Default: unchanged

  • Behavior: Values < 1000 ms are invalid and will be rejected with a clear error message.

...

• Config validation:

  • Update the config definition for controller.quorum.fetch.timeout.ms to use atLeast(1000) (or equivalent validation hook).

  • Apply the same validation path for both static startup configs and any dynamic/config-provider paths that may set this value.

• Error messaging:

  • On invalid values, throw a ConfigException with actionable guidance, e.g.:

    “controller.quorum.fetch.timeout.ms must be ≥ 1000 ms to ensure the controller fetch loop makes progress without violating timing assumptions.”

• Documentation:

  • Update the config reference to document the lower bound and the rationale (ties to fetch-wait timing and controller liveness).

...

• Backward compatibility:

  • Deployments already using values ≥ 1000 ms are unaffected.

  • Deployments with < 1000 ms will fail fast at startup (or on reconfiguration) with a clear error.

• No deprecations; this is a validation tightening to ensure correctness.

• Migration:

  • Operators must raise any sub-1000 ms values to ≥ 1000 ms before/with the upgrade.

...

• Unit tests for config validation (values below/at/above 1000).

• Integration test: start controller with invalid value → expect ConfigException and clear message.

• (Optional) Property-based test ensuring no accepted value violates the max_fetch_wait << timeout / 2 invariant under defaults.

Rejected Alternatives

...

Silent clamping to 1000 ms:

• Rejected to avoid non-obvious behavior and hidden config drift. Validation with an explicit error is clearer and safer.

...

Derive timeout automatically (e.g., k * max_fetch_wait):

• Reduces operator control; we prefer a simple invariant and explicit validation.

1. Do not change the limitation:

   • Maybe cause the system unavailable if users' configuration is wrong.

2. Make raft

...

1. max fetch wait configurable instead:

   • Out of scope here. Even if exposed, we would still need a minimum for the timeout to maintain a robust ratio.