Versions Compared

Old Version 19

changes.mady.by.user Clement Escoffier

Saved on

compared with

New Version 20

changes.mady.by.user Clement Escoffier

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

...

The run-time overhead of iPOJO is also small. On the Peaberry benchmark, iPOJO has very good performance:

Div
classshell
Wiki Markup
{div:class=shell}

Guice-Peaberry:

276.00

ns/call

{color:#ff0000}iPOJO Service Dependency:


iPOJO Service Dependency: 118.00

ns/call

{color}


Spring-DM:

2384.00

ns/call

{color:#ff0000}iPOJO Temporal Dependency:


iPOJO Temporal Dependency: 159.00

ns/call

{color} {color:#ff0000}iPOJO Temporal Dependency


iPOJO Temporal Dependency w/

proxy:

173.00

ns/call

{color} {div}

For French readers, you can find additional benchmarks in chapter 10 of iPOJO - A flexible service-oriented component model for dynamic systems

...