Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

These requirements are met by this proposal.

  • Introduce DI Use DI to setup the Roller instance and managers, i.e. manager classes should no longer be hard-coded into the Roller implementation class, instead they should be injected.
    • Enforce singletons, i.e. singletons should have a private constructor.
    • Use constructor injection to ensure that immutable objects remain immutable.
  • Do not change way Roller is configured
    • Do not introduce any additional configuration files for those installing Roller, i.e. don't change the fact that the only customization file users should ever have to touch is roller-custom.properties.
    • Do not introduce any additional configuration files for developers, i.e. developers should not have to deal with any new XML or property files.
    • Maintain the same level of back-end pluggability, i.e. it should still be possible to switch back-end implemenations by setting a single property in the Roller config
    .
  • Enforce singletons, i.e. singletons should have a private constructor.
  • Support immutable objects where appropriate, i.e. once a Roller implementation is created, it should not be possible to switch out the managers for different imlementations
    • .

Issues

  • How far should we go with DI in the 4.0 release?

...