Page History

...

Overflow has different potential requirements hence it is an open question as to whether is should be included in the pluggable interface. While one can see storage class memory (SCM) used for overflow this type of memory is likely to be exposed as a file system interface similar to any other disk. It is difficult to imagine other types of storage being used for overflow due to performance and latency requirements. The main use case seems to be for those using proprietary SCM interfaces to provide very fast low latency overflow. The open questions are (1) should overflow be included? (2) what is the incremental increase to the difficulty of implementation of pluggable stores by including overflow? (3) are the requirements similar enough to combine persistence and overflow, or should overflow, if done, be a separate proposal?

Batch Operations

Support for batch operations should be provided, and the cache store interface should have a method to check if the operations are supported natively (via the store's characteristics). A cache store may support batch operations for writes by collecting operations and using a timed and amount based approach to batch then transparently to the underlying store for performance and/or by supporting putAll(), getAll(), and deleteAll() operations.

Basic putAll(), getAll(), and deleteAll() functionality should be supported, and the store's characteristics should indicate of these are supported natively by the underlying store.

Store Characteristics

When multiple store types are supported it is important that applications be able walk the list of available options and select the store that most closely matches its needs. Cache stores should support:

...