Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user James Bognar

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Craig L Russell

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The Apache Juneau team does not differentiate between Committers and PPMC members.  However, PPMC membership must undergo an additional lazy consensus vote to the IPMC to become official.

...

To: private@juneau.apache.org
[VOTE] Joe Bob PPMC membership

I'm pleased to be calling this vote for inviting Joe Bob to be a member of the Juneau PPMC.

This vote will be open at least until 04-May-2016 1:30pm and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache Juneau PPMC votes are cast. 
(needs to be at least 72 weekday hours)

[ ] +1 Approve invitation
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object 
[ ] -1 Do not approve invitation because...

State reason why.

...

The message id of the [VOTE][RESULT] message should be preserved for notifying the Incubator PMC.

(what about the ACLA?  does that need to be completed before submission to the IPMC?  if so, where does that fit in this flow?)

 

The nominating PPMC member should send a message to the IPMC (private@incubator.apache.org) with a reference to the vote result's message id of the following form:

To: private@incubator.apache.org
New member of Juneau PPMC Joe Bob

Joe Bob has been voted as a new member of the Juneau PPMC.

The vote thread result is at: (how do you get this?  private list is not available in Pony Mail, is it?)<reference to RESULT VOTE above>

It should noted that there is a grace period of 72 hours from when the above NOTICE is sent to the Incubator PMC to when the proposed member is formally invited. This is an important part of the overall process. Failure to do this can result in an embarassing situation for people involved.

...