Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

In this KIP we propose to add version field in the MetadataResponse and UpdateMetadataRequest so that client can refresh metadata if the incoming metadata is older than the existing metadata in its cache.

Public Interfaces

Zookeeper

1) Add znode /partition_epoch with the following json format

Code Block
{
  "version" : int32,
  "partition_epoch" : int32
}

 

2) Update the znodes /brokers/topics/[topic] to use the following json format

Code Block
{
  "version" : int32,
  "partitions" : {
    partition -> [int32]   // partition has type int32. This maps partition to list of replicas
    ..
  },
  "partition_epochs" : {
    partition -> int32    // This is newly added to map partition to partition_epoch
  }
}


Request/Response protocol

1) Add leader_epoch and partition_epoch to UpdateMetadataRequest

Code Block
UpdateMetadataRequest => controller_id controller_epoch partition_states live_brokers
  controller_id => int32
  controller_epoch => int32
  partition_states => [UpdateMetadataRequestPartitionState]
  live_brokers => [UpdateMetadataRequestBroker]
 
UpdateMetadataRequestPartitionState => topic partition controller_epoch leader leader_epoch partition_epoch isr zk_version replicas offline_replicas
  topic => string
  partition => int32
  controller_epoch => int32
  leader => int32
  leader_epoch => int32
  partition_epoch => int32        <-- NEW
  isr => [int32]
  zk_version => int32
  replicas => [int32]
  offline_replicas => [int32]

 

2) Add leader_epoch and partition_epoch ) Add leader_epoch field to MetadataResponse

Code Block
MetadataResponse => throttle_time_ms brokers cluster_id controller_id topic_metadata
  throttle_time_ms => int32
  brokers => [MetadatBroker]
  cluster_id => nullable_str
  controller_id => int32
  topic_metadata => [TopicMetadata]
 
TopicMetadata => topic_error_code topic is_internal partition_metadata
  topic_error_code => int16
  topic => str
  is_internal => boolean
  partition_metadata => [PartitionMetadata]
 
PartitionMetadata => partition_error_code partition_id leader replicas leader_epoch partition_epoch isr offline_replicas
  partition_error_code => int16
  partition_id => int32
  leader => int32
  replicas => [int32]
  isrleader_epoch => [int32]
  offline_replicas => [int32]int32           <-- NEW
  leaderpartition_epoch => int32          <-- NEW
  isr => [int32]
  offline_replicas => [int32]

 

23) Add leader_epoch field and partition_epoch to OffsetCommitRequest

Code Block
OffsetCommitRequest => group_id generation_id memeber_id retention_time topics
  group_id => str
  generation_id => int32
  member_id => str
  retention_time => int64
  topics => [OffsetCommitRequestTopic]
 
OffsetCommitRequestTopic => topic partitions
  topic => str
  partitions => [OffsetCommitRequestPartition]
 
OffsetCommitRequestPartition => partition offset leader_epoch partition_epoch metadata
  partition => int32
  offset => int64
  leader_epoch => int32           <-- NEW
  partition_epoch => int32        <-- NEW
  metadata => nullable_str

 

34) Add leader_epoch field to and partition_epoch to OffsetFetchResponse

Code Block
OffsetFetchResponse => throttle_time_ms response error_code
  throttle_time_ms => int32
  responses => [OffsetFetchResponseTopic]
  error_code => int16
 
OffsetFetchResponseTopic => topic partition_responses
  topic => str
  partition_responses => [OffsetFetchResponsePartition]
 
OffsetFetchResponsePartition => partition offset leader_epoch partition_epoch metadata error_code
  partition => int32
  offset => int64
  leader_epoch => int32           <-- NEW
  partition_epoch => int32        <-- NEW
  metadata => nullable_str
  error_code => int16
 

...

Offset topic schema

4) Add leader_epoch field and partition_epoch to the schema of the offset topic value. 

Code Block
OFFSET_COMMIT_VALUE_SCHEMA => offset leader_epoch partition_epoch metadata commit_timestamp expire_timestamp 
  offset => int64
  leader_epoch => int32           <-- NEW
  partition_epoch => int32        <-- NEW
  metadata => str
  commit_timestamp => int64
  expire_timestamp => int64

...

Consumer API

51) Add error INVALID_LEADER_EPOCH. This will be a non-retriable error which may be thrown from consumer's API.

2) Add error INVALID_PARTITION_EPOCH. This will be a non-retriable error which may be thrown from consumer's API.

3) Add the following method and class to the interface org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.Consumer

Code Block
void seek(TopicPartition partition, long offset, int leaderEpoch, int partitionEpoch);
 
OffsetAndEpochs positionWithEpochs(TopicPartition partition);
 
public class OffsetAndEpochs {
  long offset;
  int leaderEpoch;
  int partitionEpoch;
}

4) Add two fields to the class org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.OffsetAndMetadata

Code Block
public class OffsetAndMetadata {
 
  private final int leaderEpoch = -1;
  private final int partitionEpoch = -1;
 
  .... // existing variables and methods
 
}

 

Proposed Changes

1) Topic creation and partition expansion.

When broker creates partitions as part of topic creation or partition expansion, broker will increment the global partition_epoch in the znode /partition_epoch by 1 and write this partition epoch in the znode /brokers/topics/[topic] according to its new json format.


2) Metadata propagation from controller to brokers and from brokers to clients.

Controller should include the partition_epoch and leader_epoch for each partition in the UpdateMetadataRequest. Broker should also include partition_epoch and leader_epoch for each partition in the MetadataResponse to clients.


3) Client's metadata refresh

After client receives MetadataResponse from a broker, it compares with the MetadataResponse with the cached metadata to check whether the MetadataResponse is outdated. The MetadataResponse is outdated if any of the following conditions are true:- Across , for all those partitions that the client is interested in, there exists a partition whose leader_epoch in the MetadataResposne < the leader_epoch in the cached metadata
- Across all those partitions that the client is interested in, there exists a partition A which is found in the cached metadata but not in the MetadataResponse. And there exists another partition B in MetadataResponse where B.topic == A.topic. This is needed for the partition expansion scenario.partition such that the following is true:

Code Block
metadataResponse[partition].partition_epoch < cachedMetadata[partition].partition_epoch || 
 (metadataResponse[partition].partition_epoch == cachedMetadata[partition].partition_epoch && 
  metadataResponse[partition].leader_epoch < cachedMetadata[partition].leader_epoch)

The client will be forced to refresh metadata again with the existing backoff mechanism if the MetadataResponse is determined to be outdated.

Note that producer is interested in all partitions. Consumers can potentially be interested in only partitions that it has explicitly subscribed to. The purpose of checking only a subset of partitions is an optimization which aim to avoid unnecessary metadata refresh when the metadata is only outdated for partitions not needed by client. In other words, it is for optimization and it is not needed for correctness.


42) Offset commit

When consumer commits offset, it looks up leader_epoch of the and partition_epoch in the cached metadata and includes this value in the OffsetCommitRequest. The leader_epoch will included and partition_epoch will then be written in the message appended to the offset topic.

When coordinator receives the OffsetCommitRequest, for each partition in the OffsetCommitRequest, it will additionally check whether the leader_epoch or partition_epoch in the request >= leader epoch in the last commit. If not, the error for that partition in the OffsetCommitResponse will be INVALID. If the partition_epoch from the OffsetCommitRequest is smaller than the last known value, the error for this partition in the OffsetCommitResponse is INVALID_PARTITION_EPOCH. Otherwise, if the partition_epoch is the same but the leader_epoch from the OffsetCommitRequest is smaller than the last known value, the error for this partition in the OffsetCommitResponse is INVALID_LEADER_EPOCH.

If the client/broker library is old, both the leader_epoch and the partition_epoch are assumed to be -1 and broker will preserve the existing behavior without doing this additional check.


5) Consumer rebalance or initialization using the offset and epoch from the Kafka offset topic3) Offset fetch

After consumer receives OffsetFetchResponse, it remembers the leader_epoch and the partition_epoch for each partition it needs to consume. Then the consumer needs to repeatedly refresh metadata until the leader_epoch in the cached metadata >= the leader_epoch in OffsetFetchResponse for all partitions it wants to consume. Note that these logic are all hidden from user and the leader_epoch will not be exposed to user via consumer's public API (e.g. OffsetAndMetadata).if a metadata is considered outdated, which is determined using the similar criteria as introduced in the above subsection "Client's metadata refresh". The only difference is that, instead of using the leader_epoch and partition_epoch from the cached metadata, the consumer uses the values from the OffsetFetchResponse.

For existing version of the offset topic, leader_epoch and partition_epoch will not be available in the value of the offset topic message. We will use leader_epoch = -1 to indicate the missing leader_epoch. In this case leader_epoch in any MetadataResponse will be larger than the leader_epoch = -1 and the consumer behavior will be the same as it is nowBoth the leader_epoch and the partition_epoch are assumed to be -1 and the client will preserve the existing behavior without doing the additional metadata refresh.


6) Consumer initialization if offset is stored externally.

When committing offset, user should use the newly added API positionWithEpochs(...) to read the leader_epoch and partition_epoch as well and store them together with the offset.

When initializing consumer, user should read the externally stored leader_epoch and partition_epoch together with the offset. Then user should call the newly added API seek(partition, offset, leaderEpoch, partitionEpoch). Later when consumer.poll() is called, the consumer needs to repeatedly refresh metadata if a metadata is considered outdated, which is determined using the similar criteria as introduced in the above subsection "Client's metadata refresh". The only difference is that, instead of using the leader_epoch and partition_epoch from the cached metadata, the consumer uses the values that were externally stored.

If user calls existing API seek(partition, offset) and there is not committed offset/leader_epoch/partition_epoch from the Kafka offset topic, both the leader_epoch and the partition_epoch are assumed to be -1 and the client will preserve the existing behavior without doing the additional check.

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

...

This can be a bit more complicated by introducing a new state in Kafka. leader_epoch is an existing state we already maintain in zookeeper. By using per-partition leader_epoch the client will only be forced to re-fresh metadata if the MetadataResponse contains out-dated metadata for those partitions that the client is interested in.

Future work

1) We can use the partition_epoch to detect that the partition used in the seek() has been deleted. Then we can thrown proper exception to the user so that user can handle it properly.

2) We can use the leader_epoch to better handle the offset reset in case of unclean leader election.