THIS IS A TEST INSTANCE. ALL YOUR CHANGES WILL BE LOST!!!!
...
| Quote | Notes | Related Issue | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Several (not dual license) GPL license files exist in the source release. Does this software include GPL or depend on any GPL licensed software?" (JM) | For instance: |
| ||||||||
| 2 | "LICENSE is missing licenses for this MIT licensed file (which also includes MIT licensed normalize.css)." (JM) | css.model/test/unit/data/testfiles/bootstrap.css |
| ||||||||
| 3 | "LICENSE is missing licenses for this IOS file (and about a dozen other files)." (JM) | html.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/html/editor/resources/DTDs/4_0/HTMLlat1.ent |
| ||||||||
| 4 | "This patch file seems to be removing a GPL/CDDL/MIT header." (JM) | css.lib/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/lib/antlrv4.patch html.validation/external/validator.patch |
| ||||||||
| 5 | "There are a large number of icons in the release do know the ip provenance of them and how they are licensed?" (JM) | Remove the rat exclusion for the images, run rat again, and we'll have a long list of these to examine. |
| ||||||||
| 6 | "There also seems to be a number of stock photos in the release. How are they licensed? Do you have permission to use or distribute them?" (JM) | javafx2.samples/DisplayShelf/src/displayshelf/animalX.jpg |
| ||||||||
| 7 | "I glanced at the binary LICENSE and NOTICE of the binary and I think there's too much information in there. - There is no need to repeat the Apache license text several times |
...