General

• I ensured all of our classes have the "Plc" prefix, as I did encounter situations in which very generic type names had collisions and I had to use the fully qualified class name (including the package name). The "Plc" prefix reduces this risk.
• This model is now simplified as it currently doesn't support reading of multi-values. There are multiple options to add Multi-Values, but I haven't decided on which option I like best:
  • Rename PlcRequest/ResponseItem to PlcSingleValueRequest/ResponseItem and add a Multi-Value counterpart, wich handles the multi-value.
  • Add a PlcMultiValueRequest/ResponseItem, which simply references multiple PlcRequest/ResponseItem objects and provides a "get(index)" method.
  • Add a getNumValues() (Not insisting on this name) method and give each of the accessors an "index" property (eventually additionally a no-args version which defaults to index 0) (I think I prefer this one but didn't want to blow up the class-diagram too much).

...