Table of Contents |
---|
This page is meant as a template for writing a KIP. To create a KIP choose Tools->Copy on this page and modify with your content and replace the heading with the next KIP number and a description of your issue. Replace anything in italics with your own description.
Status
Current state: [One of "Under Discussion", "Accepted", "Rejected"] Accepted (2.2)
Discussion thread: here [Change the link from the KIP proposal email archive to your own email thread]
JIRA: here [Change the link from KAFKA-1 to your own ticket]5692
Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).
Motivation
Describe the problems you are trying to solve.
Public Interfaces
Briefly list any new interfaces that will be introduced as part of this proposal or any existing interfaces that will be removed or changed. The purpose of this section is to concisely call out the public contract that will come along with this feature.
A public interface is any change to the following:
Binary log format
The network protocol and api behavior
Any class in the public packages under clientsConfiguration, especially client configuration
org/apache/kafka/common/serialization
org/apache/kafka/common
org/apache/kafka/common/errors
org/apache/kafka/clients/producer
org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer (eventually, once stable)
Monitoring
Command line tools and arguments
- Anything else that will likely break existing users in some way when they upgrade
Proposed Changes
Describe the new thing you want to do in appropriate detail. This may be fairly extensive and have large subsections of its own. Or it may be a few sentences. Use judgement based on the scope of the change.
Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan
- What impact (if any) will there be on existing users?
- If we are changing behavior how will we phase out the older behavior?
- If we need special migration tools, describe them here.
- When will we remove the existing behavior?
Rejected Alternatives
Similarly to KIP-179, the kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh
tool takes a --zookeeper
option which means users of the tool must have access to the ZooKeeper cluster backing the Kafka cluster. There is no AdminClient API via which the preferred leader can be elected, so it is only this tool which can be used to do this job. This KIP will provide an AdminClient API for electing the preferred leader, add an option to the kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh
tool to use this new API and deprecate the --zookeeper
option.
Public Interface
The kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh
tool will gain a --bootstrap-server
option and the existing --zookeeper
option will be deprecated.
The AdminClient will gain a new method:
electPreferredLeaders(Collection<TopicPartition> partitions)
A new network protocol will be added:
ElectPreferredLeadersRequest and ElectPreferredLeadersResponse
Proposed Changes
kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh
The --zookeeper
option will be retained and will:
- Cause a deprecation warning to be printed to standard error. The message will say that the
--zookeeper
option will be removed in a future version and that--bootstrap-server
is the replacement option. - Perform the election via ZooKeeper, as currently.
A new --bootstrap-server
option will be added and will:
- Perform the election by calling AdminClient.electPreferredLeaders() on an AdminClient instance bootstrapped from the via the given
--bootstrap-server
.
Using both options in the same command line will produce an error message and the tool will exit without doing the intended operation.
It is anticipated that a future version of Kafka would remove support for the --zookeeper
option.
When the --bootstrap-server
option is used new further new options will be available:
admin.config
— "Admin client config properties file to pass to the admin client when--bootstrap-server
is given."
The --help
output of the tool will be updated to explain what the preferred replica *is*, because this is currently not discoverable from the command line tool help, only from the documentation on the Kafka website.
The --help
output for the tool will be updated to note that the command is not necessary if the broker is configured with auto.leader.rebalance.enable=true
.
AdminClient: electPreferredLeaders()
The following methods will be added to AdminClient:
Code Block |
---|
/**
* Elect the preferred replica of the given {@code partitions} as leader, or
* elect the preferred replica for all partitions as leader if the argument to {@code partitions} is null.
*
* This operation is supported by brokers with version 1.0 or higher.
*/
ElectPreferredLeadersResult electPreferredLeaders(Collection<TopicPartition> partitions, ElectPreferredLeadersOptions options)
ElectPreferredLeadersResult electPreferredLeaders(Collection<TopicPartition> partitions) |
Where
Code Block |
---|
public class ElectPreferredLeadersOptions extends AbstractOptions<ElectPreferredLeadersOptions> {
}
public class ElectPreferredLeadersResult {
// package access constructor
/**
* Get the result of the election for the given TopicPartition.
* If there was not an election triggered for the given TopicPartition, the
* returned future will complete with an error.
*/
public KafkaFuture<Void> partitionResult(TopicPartition partition) { ... }
/**
* <p>Get the topic partitions for which a leader election was attempted.
* The presence of a topic partition in the Collection obtained from
* the returned future does not indicate the election was successful:
* A partition will appear in this result if an election was attempted
* even if the election was not successful.</p>
*
* <p>This method is provided to discover the partitions when
* {@link AdminClient#electPreferredLeaders(Collection)} is called
* with a null {@code partitions} argument.</p>
*/
public KafkaFuture<Set<TopicPartition>> partitions();
/**
* Return a future which succeeds if all the topic elections succeed.
*/
KafkaFuture<Void> all() { ... }
} |
A call to electPreferredLeaders() will send a ElectPreferredLeadersRequest to the controller broker.
NetworkProtocol: ElectPreferredLeadersRequest and ElectPreferredLeadersResponse
No Format |
---|
ElectPreferredLeadersRequest => [TopicPartitions] TimeoutMs
TopicPartitions => Topic PartitionId
Topic => string
PartitionId => [int32]
TimeoutMs => int32 |
Where
Field | Description |
---|---|
partitionId | The partitions of this topic whose preferred leader should be elected |
timeoutMs | The time in ms to wait for the election to complete. |
The request will require AlterCluster on the Cluster resource, since it is a change that affects the whole cluster.
Note: It is not an error if there is a duplicate (topic, partition)-pair in the request.
Note that a ElectPreferredLeadersRequest
must be sent to the controller of the cluster.
No Format |
---|
ElectPreferredLeadersResponse => ThrottleTimeMs [ReplicaElectionResult]
ThrottleTimeMs => int32
ReplicaElectionResult => Topic [PartitionResult]
Topic => string
PartitionResult => PartitionId ErrorCode ErrorMessage
PartitionId => int32
ErrorCode => int16
ErrorMessage => string |
Where
Field | Description |
---|---|
ThrottleTimeMs | The duration in milliseconds for which the request was throttled due to a quota violation, or zero if the request did not violate any quota |
Topic | The topic name |
PartitionId | The partition id |
ErrorCode | The result error, or zero if there was no error. |
ErrorMessage | The result message, or null if there was no error. |
Anticipated errors:
UNKNOWN_TOPIC_OR_PARTITION (3) If the topic or partition doesn't exist on any broker in the cluster. Note that the use of this code is not precisely the same as it's usual meaning of "This server does not host this topic-partition".
NOT_CONTROLLER (41) If the request is sent to a broker that is not the controller for the cluster.
- CLUSTER_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED (31) If the user didn't have Alter access to the topic.
PREFERRED_LEADER_NOT_AVAILABLE (80) If the preferred lead could not be elected (for example because it is not currently in the ISR)
NONE
(0) The elections were successful.
Broker-side election algorithm
The broker-side handling of ElectPreferredLeadersRequest
will be somewhat different than currently:
- On receipt of
ElectPreferredLeadersRequest
the controller enqueue aPreferredReplicaLeaderElection
with theControllerManager
After the batch of elections has been started, a callback will either return the responses to the client (if they're available immediately, for example all the leaders were already the preferred ones), or use a purgatory to await the completion of the all of the elections.
- Each
UpdateMetadataRequest
will try to complete the election purgatory. - Successful or timed-out completion of the
PreferredReplicaLeaderElection
will result in aElectPreferredLeadersResponse
being returned to the client
This change means that the ElectPreferredLeadersResponse
is sent when the election is actually complete, rather than when the /admin/preferred_replica_election
znode has merely been updated. Thus if the election fails, the ElectPreferredLeadersResponse
's error_code
will provide a reason.
When support for the --zookeeper
option is eventually removed, the need for the /admin/preferred_replica_election
znode will disappear and consequently the code managing it will be removed.
Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan
Existing users of the kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh
will receive a deprecation warning when they use the --zookeeper
option. The option will be removed in a future version of Kafka. If this KIP is introduced in version 1.0.0 the removal could happen in 2.0.0.
Rejected Alternatives
One alternative is to do nothing: Let the tool continue to communicate with ZooKeeper directly.
Another alternative is to do exactly this KIP, but without the deprecation of --zookeeper
. That would have a higher long term maintenance burden, and would prevent any future plans to, for example, provide alternative cluster technologies than ZooKeeperIf there are alternative ways of accomplishing the same thing, what were they? The purpose of this section is to motivate why the design is the way it is and not some other way.