Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Page properties

Document the state by adding a label to the FLIP page with one of "discussion", "accepted", "released", "rejected".

Discussion threadhttps://lists.apache.org/thread/m2v9n4yynm97v8swhqj2o5k0sqlb5ym4
Vote threadhttps://lists.apache.org/thread/wpbms7rywjcodv7qdgx803277th508og
JIRA

Jira
serverASF JIRA
serverId5aa69414-a9e9-3523-82ec-879b028fb15b
keyFLINK-15959

ReleaseTBA1.19


Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

As described in FLINK-15959[Add min number of slots configuration to limit total number of slots], currently ResourceManager will only start new workers when there are resource requirements for submitted jobs and idle workers will be released after timeout. But in certain scenarios, it is necessary to maintain certain resources as soon as ResourceManager is started and these resources should not be released even if they are free. Here are some scenarios which can benefit from this proposalCurrently, the Flink cluster only requests Task Managers (TMs) when there is a resource requirement, and idle TMs are released after a certain period of time. However, in certain scenarios, we need to improve the efficiency of job execution by maintaining a certain number of available resources in the system. For example:

  1. For session clusters running short lived-jobs like OLAP, we should treat session clusters as a long-running service. Having running workers all the time can greatly improve the service stability and reduce the job's cold-start latency;

  2. For application mode, batch job might be scheduled stage by stage. If the next region requires more resources, it might take more time to pull up required resources. If users actually know how many resources are needed when running a single job, initialize all workers when cluster starts can speed up the resource allocation process;

  3. Flink supports FLINK-12122 [Spread out tasks evenly across all available registered TaskManagers], but this requires enough registered TaskManagers. For session cluster, all TaskManagers starting at the beginning can thoroughly solve this problem
  4. ;

  5. for application mode, min required TaskManagers is allocated with best effort which might also help improve the evenly distribution but not guaranteed solve this;


Public Interfaces

Option nameDefault Value
slotmanager.number-of-slots.min0
slotmanager.min-total-resource.cpuno default value, it can be derived from slotmanager.number-of-slots.min
slotmanager.min-total-resource.memoryno default value, it can be derived from slotmanager.number-of-slots.min

Notice: Like the maximum resource options, the minimum resource options will also be invalidated in standalone clusters.


Proposed Changes

Minimum required resource check in DefaultResourceAllocationStrategy

The minimum resource allocation limitation will be implemented in the DefaultResourceAllocationStrategy of FineGrainedSlotManager.

Each time when SlotManager needs to reconcile the cluster resources or fulfill job resource requirements, the DefaultResourceAllocationStrategy will check if the minimum resource requirement has been fulfilled. If it is not, DefaultResourceAllocationStrategy will add PendingTaskManagers to the ResourceAllocationResult/ResourceReconcileResult request new PendingTaskManagers and FineGrainedSlotManager will allocate new worker resources accordingly.

Notice: The minimum resource allocation limitation will be tried fulfilled in the best effort manner. The unfulfilled request will be retried in the next resource check but will not block slotmanager from allocating resources to submitted jobsjob scheduling.

Resource stability check in SlotManagerConfiguration

After minimum required resource options are introduced, users can configure both minimum and maximum required resources in SlotManager, which might lead to worker resource oscillation. Here is an example:

...

To avoid this oscillation, we need to check the worker number derived from minimum and maximum resource configuration is consistent before starting SlotManager.

Notice: The resource stability check will be disabled when the minimum resource option is 0 which is set as default.

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

  • What impact (if any) will there be on existing users?  No

Test Plan

UT & Manually verify that the min resource allocation limitation is working as expected.

Rejected Alternatives

If there are alternative ways of accomplishing the same thing, what were they? The purpose of this section is to motivate why the design is the way it is and not some other way.