Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents

Status

Current state:  Under discussionAccepted

Discussion thread: here

Voting thread: here

JIRA:

Jira
serverASF JIRA
serverId5aa69414-a9e9-3523-82ec-879b028fb15b
keyKAFKA-19742

...

Code Block
public enum AcknowledgeType {
    /** The record was consumed successfully. */
    ACCEPT((byte) 1),
    /** The record was not consumed successfully. Release it for another delivery attempt. */
    RELEASE((byte) 2),
    /** The record was not consumed successfully. Reject it and do not release it for another delivery attempt. */
    REJECT((byte) 3),
    /** Consumer needs more time to process the record. Renew the lease. */
    RENEW((byte) 4);	// New entry per KIP-1222
    ...
}


  • There The acknowledgement type will be an addition used in the org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ShareAcquireMode enum defined in KIP-1206.  Code Blockpublic enum ShareAcquireMode { BATCH_OPTIMIZED("batch_optimized"), RECORD_LIMIT("record_limit"), RENEW_ACK_MODE("renew_ack_mode"); public final String name; ShareAcquireMode(final String name) { this.name = name; } /** * Case-insensitive acquire mode lookup by string name. */ public static ShareAcquireMode of(final String name) {existing ShareFetch and ShareAcknowledge RPCs. Hence, we must add new versions for them. Additionally, we will add a field IsRenewAck defaulting to false to both the RPCs. This field will help in optimising the broker side implementation for processing renew acknowledgements.
    • clients/src/main/resources/common/message/ShareFetchRequest.json

      Code Block
      // ShareFetch
      {
        "apiKey": 78,
        "type": "request",
        "listeners": ["broker"],
        "name": "ShareFetchRequest",
        // Version 0 was used for early access of KIP-932 in Apache Kafka 4.0 but removed in Apacke Kafka 4.1.
        //
        // Version 1 is the initial stable version (KIP-932).
        //
        // Version 2 supports RENEW ack type
        "validVersions": "1-2",
        "flexibleVersions": "0+",
        "fields": [
          { "name": "GroupId", "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersions": "0+", "default": "null", "entityType": "groupId",
            "about": "The 
    return
    • group 
    ShareAcquireMode.valueOf(name.toUpperCase(Locale.ROOT)); } }The acknowledgement type will be used in the existing ShareFetch and ShareAcknowledge RPCs. Hence, we must add new versions for them. Additionally, we will add a new value for the field shareAcquireMode called renew-ack-mode with value id value 255. This field will help in optimising the broker side implementation for processing renew acknowledgements.
    • clients/src/main/resources/common/message/ShareFetchRequest.json

      Code Block
      // ShareFetch
      {
        "apiKey": 78,
       identifier." },
          { "name": "MemberId", "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersions": "0+",
            "about": "The member ID." },
          { "name": "ShareSessionEpoch", "type": "requestint32",
        "listenersversions": ["broker0+"],
        "name    "about": "ShareFetchRequest",
        // VersionThe current share session epoch: 0 wasto usedopen fora early access of KIP-932 in Apache Kafka 4.0 but removed in Apacke Kafka 4.1.
        //
        // Version 1 is the initial stable version (KIP-932).
        //
        // Version 2 supports RENEW ack type
        "validVersions": "1-2",
        "flexibleVersionsshare session; -1 to close it; otherwise increments for consecutive requests." },
          { "name": "MaxWaitMs", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+",
        "fields": [
          { "nameabout": "GroupId", "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersionsThe maximum time in milliseconds to wait for the response." },
          { "name": "0+MinBytes", "defaulttype": "nullint32", "entityTypeversions": "groupId0+",
            "about": "The group identifier minimum bytes to accumulate in the response." },
          { "name": "MemberIdMaxBytes", "type": "stringint32", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersionsdefault": "0+0x7fffffff",
            "about": "The maximum memberbytes to IDfetch." },
          { See KIP-74 for cases where this limit may not be honored." },
          { "name": "ShareSessionEpochMaxRecords", "type": "int32", "versions": "01+",
            "about": "The currentmaximum sharenumber session epoch: 0of records to openfetch. aThis sharelimit session;can -1be toexceeded closefor it;alignment otherwiseof increments for consecutive requestsbatch boundaries." },
          { "name": "MaxWaitMsBatchSize", "type": "int32", "versions": "01+",
            "about": "The maximumoptimal timenumber inof milliseconds to wait for the responserecords for batches of acquired records and acknowledgements." },
          { "name": "MinBytesIsRenewAck", "type": "int32bool", "versions": "02+", "default": false,
            "about": "TheWhether minimumrenew bytestype toacknowledgement accumulatepresent in the responseAcknowledgementBatches." }, // Version 2 supports RENEW ack type and this field serves as an indicator (KIP-1222)
          { "name": "MaxBytesTopics", "type": "int32[]FetchTopic", "versions": "0+", "default": "0x7fffffff",
            "about": "The maximum bytestopics to fetch. See KIP-74 for cases where this limit may not be honored." },
      ", "fields": [
            { "name": "MaxRecordsTopicId", "type": "int32uuid", "versions": "10+",
            "about": "The maximumunique number of records to fetch. This limit can be exceeded for alignment of batch boundaries." topic ID.", "mapKey":  true },
            { "name": "BatchSizePartitions", "type": "int32[]FetchPartition", "versions": "10+",
              "about": "The optimalpartitions number of records for batches of acquired records and acknowledgements." },
      to fetch.", "fields": [
              { "name": "ShareAcquireModePartitionIndex", "type": "int8int32", "versions": "20+", "mapKey":  true,
                "about": "The acquire mode to control the fetch behavior: 0 - batch-optimized, 1 - record-limit, 255 - renew-ack-modepartition index." },
        // From KIP-1206
          { "name": "TopicsPartitionMaxBytes", "type": "[]FetchTopicint32", "versions": "0+",
                "about": "The maximum topicsbytes to fetch.", "fields": [
            { "name": "TopicId", "type": "uuid", "versions": "0+", "about": "The unique topic ID.", "mapKey":  true },
       from this partition. 0 when only acknowledgement with no fetching is required. See KIP-74 for cases where this limit may not be honored." },
              { "name": "PartitionsAcknowledgementBatches", "type": "[]FetchPartitionAcknowledgementBatch", "versions": "0+",
                "about": "TheRecord partitionsbatches to fetchacknowledge.", "fields": [
                { "name": "PartitionIndexFirstOffset", "type": "int32int64", "versions": "0+", "mapKey":
        true,
                "about": "The partition index." First offset of batch of records to acknowledge."},
                { "name": "PartitionMaxBytesLastOffset", "type": "int32int64", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "The maximum bytes to fetch from this partition. 0 when only acknowledgement with no fetching is required. See KIP-74 for cases where this limit may not be honored." },
            Last offset (inclusive) of batch of records to acknowledge."},
                { "name": "AcknowledgementBatchesAcknowledgeTypes", "type": "[]AcknowledgementBatchint8", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "RecordArray batches toof acknowledge.", "fields": [
                { "name": "FirstOffset", "type": "int64", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "First offset of batch of records to acknowledge."},
                 types - 0:Gap,1:Accept,2:Release,3:Reject,4:Renew."} // Version 2 supports RENEW ack type (KIP-1222)
               ]}
            ]}
          ]},
          { "name": "LastOffsetForgottenTopicsData", "type": "int64[]ForgottenTopic", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "LastThe offsetpartitions (inclusive)to ofremove batchfrom ofthis recordsshare to acknowledgesession."},
         "fields": [
             { "name": "AcknowledgeTypesTopicId", "type": "[]int8uuid", "versions": "0+",
       "about": "The unique topic ID."},
            { "aboutname": "Array of acknowledge types - 0:Gap,1:Accept,2:Release,3:Reject,4:Renew."} // Version 2 supports RENEW ack type (KIP-1222)
               ]}
            Partitions", "type": "[]int32", "versions": "0+",
              "about": "The partitions indexes to forget." }
          ]}
          ]},
       
      }


    • clients/src/main/resources/common/message/ShareAcknowledgeRequest.json  

      Code Block
      // ShareAcknowledge
      {
        "apiKey": 79,
           { "name": "ForgottenTopicsData", "type": "[]ForgottenTopicrequest",
        "versionslisteners": ["0+broker"],
            "aboutname": "ShareAcknowledgeRequest"The,
       partitions to// removeVersion from0 thiswas share session.", "fields": [
            { "name": "TopicId", "type": "uuid", "versions": "0+", "about": "The unique topic ID."},
            { "name": "Partitions", "type": "[]int32", "versionsused for early access of KIP-932 in Apache Kafka 4.0 but removed in Apache Kafka 4.1.
        //
        // Version 1 is the initial stable version (KIP-932).
        //
        // Version 2 will have RENEW ack type
        "validVersions": "1-2",
        "flexibleVersions": "0+",
        "fields": [
          { "aboutname": "GroupId"The partitions indexes to forget." }
          ]}
        ]
      }

      clients/src/main/resources/common/message/ShareAcknowledgeRequest.json  

      Code Block
      // ShareAcknowledge
      {
        "apiKey": 79,
        "type": "request",
        "listeners": ["broker"],
        "name": "ShareAcknowledgeRequest",
        // Version 0 was used for early access of KIP-932 in Apache Kafka 4.0 but removed in Apacke Kafka 4.1.
        //
        // Version 1 is the initial stable version (KIP-932).
        //
        // Version 2 will have RENEW ack type
        "validVersions": "1-2",
        "flexibleVersions, "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersions": "0+", "default": "null", "entityType": "groupId",
            "about": "The group identifier." },
          { "name": "MemberId", "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersions": "0+",
            "about": "The member ID." },
          { "name": "ShareSessionEpoch", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+",
        "fields": [
          { "nameabout": "GroupId", "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersions": "0+", "default": "null", "entityType": "groupId",
            "about": "The group identifierThe current share session epoch: 0 to open a share session; -1 to close it; otherwise increments for consecutive requests." },
          { "name": "MemberIdIsRenewAck", "type": "stringbool", "versions": "02+", "nullableVersionsdefault": "0+"false,
            "about": "The member IDWhether renew type acknowledgement present in AcknowledgementBatches." }, // Version 2 supports RENEW ack type and this field serves as an indicator (KIP-1222)
          { "name": "ShareSessionEpochTopics", "type": "int32[]AcknowledgeTopic", "versions": "0+",
            "about": "The currenttopics share session epoch: 0containing records to open a share session; -1 to close it; otherwise increments for consecutive requests." },
      acknowledge.", "fields": [
            { "name": "TopicsTopicId", "type": "[]AcknowledgeTopicuuid", "versions": "0+",
            "about": "The topicsunique containing records to acknowledgetopic ID.", "fieldsmapKey": true [},
            { "name": "TopicIdPartitions", "type": "uuid[]AcknowledgePartition", "versions": "0+",
              "about": "The uniquepartitions topic ID.", "mapKey": true },
            { "name": "Partitions", "type": "[]AcknowledgePartition", "versions": "0+",
              "about": "The partitions containing recordscontaining records to acknowledge.", "fields": [
              { "name": "PartitionIndex", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+", "mapKey": true,
                "about": "The partition index." },
              { "name": "AcknowledgementBatches", "type": "[]AcknowledgementBatch", "versions": "0+",
                "about": "Record batches to acknowledge.", "fields": [
                { "name": "FirstOffset", "type": "int64", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "First offset of batch of records to acknowledge." },
                { "name": "LastOffset", "type": "int64", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "Last offset (inclusive) of batch of records to acknowledge." },
                { "name": "AcknowledgeTypes", "type": "[]int8", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "Array of acknowledge types - 0:Gap,1:Accept,2:Release,3:Reject,4:Renew" } // Version 2 supports RENEW ack type (KIP-1222)
               ]}
            ]}
          ]}
        ]
      }
    New method exposed in

    • clients/src/main/
    java
    • resources/
    org
    • common/
    apache/kafka/clients/consumer/ShareConsumer.java interface to help the application determine RENEW interval
    • message/ShareAcknowledgeResponse.json (Response will contain a new field AcquisitionLockTimeoutMs from version 2 onwards)
      Code Block
    /**
    • {
       
    Returns
    •  
    the acquisition lock timeout value in milliseconds for the last set of records fetched from the brokers. */ public Optional<Integer> acquisitionLockTimeoutMs();
    • "apiKey": 79,
        "type": "response",
        "name": "ShareAcknowledgeResponse",
        // Version 0 was used for early access of KIP-932 in Apache Kafka 4.0 but removed in Apache Kafka 4.1.
        //
        // Version 1 is the initial stable version (KIP-932).
        //
        // Version 2 introduces Renew acknowledgements (KIP-1222).
        "validVersions": "1-2",
        "flexibleVersions": "0+",
        // Supported errors:
        // - GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED (version 0+)
        // - TOPIC_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED (version 0+)
        // - UNKNOWN_TOPIC_OR_PARTITION (version 0+)
        // - SHARE_SESSION_NOT_FOUND (version 0+)
        // - INVALID_SHARE_SESSION_EPOCH (version 0+)
        // - NOT_LEADER_OR_FOLLOWER (version 0+)
        // - UNKNOWN_TOPIC_ID (version 0+)
        // - INVALID_RECORD_STATE (version 0+)
        // - KAFKA_STORAGE_ERROR (version 0+)
        // - INVALID_REQUEST (version 0+)
        // - UNKNOWN_SERVER_ERROR (version 0+)
        "fields": [
          { "name": "ThrottleTimeMs", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+",
            "about": "The duration in milliseconds for which the request was throttled due to a quota violation, or zero if the request did not violate any quota." },
          { "name": "ErrorCode", "type": "int16", "versions": "0+",
            "about": "The top level response error code." },
          { "name": "ErrorMessage", "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersions": "0+", "default": "null",
            "about": "The top-level error message, or null if there was no error." },
          { "name": "AcquisitionLockTimeoutMs", "type": "int32", "versions": "2+",
            "about": "The time in milliseconds for which the acquired records are locked." },
          { "name": "Responses", "type": "[]ShareAcknowledgeTopicResponse", "versions": "0+",
            "about": "The response topics.", "fields": [
            { "name": "TopicId", "type": "uuid", "versions": "0+", "mapKey": true,
              "about": "The unique topic ID." },
            { "name": "Partitions", "type": "[]PartitionData", "versions": "0+",
              "about": "The topic partitions.", "fields": [
              { "name": "PartitionIndex", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+",
                "about": "The partition index." },
              { "name": "ErrorCode", "type": "int16", "versions": "0+",
                "about": "The error code, or 0 if there was no error." },
              { "name": "ErrorMessage", "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersions": "0+", "default": "null",
                "about": "The error message, or null if there was no error." },
              { "name": "CurrentLeader", "type": "LeaderIdAndEpoch", "versions": "0+",
                "about": "The current leader of the partition.", "fields": [
                { "name": "LeaderId", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "The ID of the current leader or -1 if the leader is unknown." },
                { "name": "LeaderEpoch", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+",
                  "about": "The latest known leader epoch." }
              ]}
            ]}
          ]},
          { "name": "NodeEndpoints", "type": "[]NodeEndpoint", "versions": "0+",
            "about": "Endpoints for all current leaders enumerated in PartitionData with error NOT_LEADER_OR_FOLLOWER.", "fields": [
            { "name": "NodeId", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+",
              "mapKey": true, "entityType": "brokerId", "about": "The ID of the associated node." },
            { "name": "Host", "type": "string", "versions": "0+",
              "about": "The node's hostname." },
            { "name": "Port", "type": "int32", "versions": "0+",
              "about": "The node's port." },
            { "name": "Rack", "type": "string", "versions": "0+", "nullableVersions": "0+", "default": "null",
              "about": "The rack of the node, or null if it has not been assigned to a rack." }
          ]}
        ]
      }
  • New method exposed in clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/ShareConsumer.java interface to help the application determine RENEW interval. 

    Code Block
    /**
     Returns the acquisition lock timeout value in milliseconds for the last set of records fetched from the brokers.
     This is an optional field as unless an application poll() results in a ShareFetch to a broker, this value cannot be
     determined.
    */
    public Optional<Integer> acquisitionLockTimeoutMs();

     

  • An additional tag for the metric RecordAcknowledgementsPerSec, defined in KIP-1103, will get introduced as a side effect of introducing the RENEW ack type. The new definition of the metric is: 

    RationaleMetric NameTypeGroupTagsDescriptionJMX Bean
    Tracks the rate of records acknowledged per acknowledgement type.RecordAcknowledgementsPerSecMeterShareGroupMetricsackType:{Accept|Release|Reject|Renew}The rate per second of records acknowledged per acknowledgement type.

    kafka.server:type=ShareGroupMetrics,name=RecordAcknowledgementsPerSec,ackType={Accept|Release|Reject|Renew}


     

Proposed Changes

KIP-932 added two new RPCs for record fetching and acknowledging: ShareFetch and ShareAcknowledge. From the share consumer, these RPCs are called when an application invokes poll(Duration)and commitSync(Duration)/commitAsync().

...

  • The application should use the new acknowledgement type AcknowledgeType.RENEW as an argument to acknowledge(ConsumerRecord, AcknowledgeType) for that record.
  • It can then call either commitSync()/commitAsync() or poll() to send the acknowledgement to the server. Furthermore, the application could also leverage the new ShareConsumer.acquisitionLockTimeoutMs() method to decide on the timeframe in which to make the RENEW call. If the subsequent call is poll(), the share consumer will create a ShareFetch request with IsRenewAck set to true and MaxWaitMs, MinBytes, MaxBytesandMaxRecordsto 0. If instead of poll(), commitSync()/commitAsync() are called, IsRenewAck will be set appropriately as well.

There is a case where an application tries to send a RENEW acknowledgement to an old broker which does not support the new type. To remedy this, on the next call to poll/commitSync/commitAsync, the share consumer will verify if the ack type is supported and notify the application using the appropriate callback handler. The share consumer will return the exception UnsupportedVersionException (Errors.UNSUPPORTED_VERSION (35)) as response to a RENEW request meant for an unsupported broker. This will be handled completely on the client side where the share consumer will use the API version RPC to determine acknowledgement type validity.

...

On the broker side, receiving a RENEW acknowledgement for a specific batch or offset will cancel the existing acquisition lock timeout task and start a new one with the same timeout value as group.share.record.lock.duration.ms. There is one caveat here. If the application causes a ShareFetch RPC to be sent (poll() call) on which RENEW acknowledgements are piggybacked, it could happen that the renewed acquisition lock again times out before the poll() completes. To get around this, we will not return any new records from the broker side on ShareFetch requests containing RENEW acknowledgementscontaining RENEW acknowledgements (indicated by the IsRenewAck field). That way we are guaranteed that the poll()  completes timely and we can return the response of acknowledgements immediately to the application. This also implies that we will not honour the maxWaitMs, maxBytes and maxRecords in the ShareFetch request containing RENEW ack type. Hence, these 3 fields must be set to 0 for requests containing RENEW acknowledgements.that the poll()  completes timely and we can return the response of acknowledgements immediately to the application. A true value of IsRenewAck makes it clear that a ShareFetch request is renewing rather than acquiring records. If IsRenewAck is set to true, MaxWaitMs, MinBytes, MaxBytes and MaxRecords must be set to 0. Also, by looking at the value of IsRenewAck, the broker could process the request a bit more optimally.

If a share consumer sends a ShareAcknowledge request for renewal, the response should provide the value of the acquisition lock timeout. This is because the timeout is a configurable field. It could happen that a record is fetched with a specific timeout, then the timeout value is updated on the broker and then the share consumer issues a ShareAcknowledge RENEW call on the aforementioned record. Now the renewed timeout should be timely communicated to the consumer. The new field AcquisitionLockTimeoutMs in ShareAcknowledge response will fulfil this use caseThe broker will also make use of the ShareAcquireMode to efficiently check if the ShareFetch contains RENEW acknowledgements and this will help in returning the response faster to the share consumer after renewing the acquisition lock.

If the RENEW request received by a broker is invalid and an error is returned, the application should use existing acknowledgement commit callback to listen for the same. Specifically, the application should set a commit response handler callback in ShareConsumer.setAcknowledgementCommitCallback(AcknowledgementCommitCallback) and handle errors, if any. This is the usual mechanism to check commit status in explicit mode and this KIP does not make any change in this code path.

...