Page History

1. Apache way - define the structure of the commercial report 
2. 2 reports (small dimension): one commercial and one data focus
3. Complete survey: Marketing and the E&I -  suggestions of the updates for the questions will come from us.
4. Improvements in new Project

initial proposal: 

[1] https://www.outreachy.org/outreachy-december-2021-internship-round/communities/apache/add-open-telemetry-support-for-apache-airflow/cfp/ 

[2] https://www.outreachy.org/outreachy-december-2021-internship-round/communities/apache/convert-airflow-local-development-environment-bree/cfp/

[3] https://www.outreachy.org/outreachy-december-2021-internship-round/communities/apache/create-rest-api-for-apache-gora-functions/cfp/

[4] https://www.outreachy.org/outreachy-december-2021-internship-round/communities/apache/implement-distributed-tracing-for-apache-activemq-/cfp/

[5] https://www.outreachy.org/outreachy-december-2021-internship-round/communities/apache/rewrite-github-action-workflows-to-python/cfp/

Mentors in mentors ML (1 mentee per project):

• Jarek: subscribed 
• Nasser: subscribed 
• Eladkal: to be subscribed 
• Kevin: subscribed 
• Clebert: to be subscribed 

New Proposal for Improvement: Dashboard - how to show currently invisible contributions

• easier to promote in other PMCs
• The project is for creating the intervention, which involves two steps:
  • collect data with pre-/post-survey (only Apache Beam) - to see if improvement worked
  • developing the dashboard and data collection for the dashboard
• The project does not include other PMCs in this round - but we will write the documentation on how to establish it in other PMC

TODO:

• Georg: Send Survey instrument (front page and questions and everything) as a Google Doc for comments to Katia --or better: in Convluence
  • Katia: Get feedback and suggestions for improvements
• Georg: Send all of the messages as a Google Doc --or better: in Convluence
  • Katia: share with marketing
• Georg: Update the project plan - more time to revise survey questions, deadline March 31, 2023
• Georg: Add Improvement description and plan – Coordinate between Anita and Bitergia
• Anita: Talk with Bitergia about current Dashboard design
• Georg: Figure out license for the Dashboard that is built
• Anita: Think through the Dashboard and what is will be (think deeply)
• Anita: Get Confluence set up

Georg's notes before we created the Confluence page:

- Google/ASF signed contract
- Needed 2nd review and amended contract
- New deadline: 31st of March 2023
- Bitergia/ASF contract needs to be reviewed with Marketing

## Apache Way modus operandi
- Add in the "deliverable" understanding what the Apache Way is
  - Everyone who participated in the past was changed out - new people took on role - the way things are seen is now different - previous board was happy with the report and what was done
  - Want to include in the report that the Apache Way is explained - show how things work
  - Jo had commented on the report on the report that the Apache Way needs to be explained better
  - The "new report" will need to focus on the Apache Way as the modus operandi. 

## Update the survey
- Anita: Help from ASF with survey questions - Jo or Katia - someone needs to approve "this is Apache Way
  - Katia: Need to revise questions
  - Georg: need to update contract to include revising survey questions -- 
- Katia: Write report first with placeholders for data - insert data after collecting the data
  - Katia? : is there a link with the questions without comments (TODO - new google doc to share)
    - Katia will share with board and get input on what should be changed
  - concern is to open it to the ASF too early - first get criticism from small group before opening to larger group
  - before marketing wasn't involved until afterward, this time, we involve marketing form beginning

## All messaging
- (TODO) compile full messaging that was shared and sent - emails, survey intro, reminders, invites
- Maybe use #edi-research again
  - Need to have Justin Mclean and Jo (and anyone else with a strong opinion)
- We try to use Confluent for shared documents and meeting notes

## Improvement in new project

• Apache Beam has to be included 
• Proposal was to improve mentorship, use experience from Outreachy, but Beam is not participating

## Contract

• Need to mention Google
• Need to confirm license of work
• 2 reports
• Apache Way as a main concept
• revise survey

Dashboard capabilities

• gender indication
• retention rates
• code contributions vs non-code contributions 
• issue tracking 
• bitergia tooling 
• design of the dashboard done by Anita's team. ideal case Beam should contribute to the design.
• the goal is to promote recognition of the contributions by the members of the PMC. 
• Data schema of Bitergia Analytics dashboard (link)
• Kevin, part of Beam PMC, offered to help with the project, but best to limit the time requirement
• software to monitor is a reference. collecting software is opensource. 
• Asks for Apache Beam PMC
  • Review the Dashboard, provide feedback, provide suggestions
  • Put the dashboard on the Beam website, if they want the dashboard to be external (Anita's hope) – encourage contributors by showing that their contributions are seen and valued. // Apache Marketing may want to make the dashboard internal only because the data is not under control and may show unfavorable numbers. // Do an internal dashboard only would not allow for a scientific investigation of whether the dashboard is helping improve the project through there transparency the dashboard provides. // The PMC has 50-ish people and the dashboard would be visible to all PMC members. // The improvement could be that the PMC has taken action based on the dashboard.
  • Help with identifying the gender of members

review: 

https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SxLcCrZCKIDv_CWizPdU5_oh_MVKbjbAzk5VT3F9V0w/edit

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xDe_qx1JX4PBVBn13ShLeK1WW21SREgXWzmFG_X-hA0/edit

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SxLcCrZCKIDv_CWizPdU5_oh_MVKbjbAzk5VT3F9V0w/edit

Launch Plan - The 2020 ASF Community Survey

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s0TVBFf-KvOTl3IejI2FFOOTdkugZlX_ptnN6YWMFN0/edit#

Action Item:

• Survey Design: OSU: to write rationale for every question in the survey. 
  • Survey Design: OSU: Keep the survey as a user would see/ add front matter
  • Survey Design: Close all current comments
  • Ready for our next meeting (1 week - April 7): 
• Katia, contact the working group and open the survey for discussion for 15 days. April 7th send the survey. 
• Luis/Mariam+Steve: have a training Bitergia toolware session
• Dashboard: OSU: Prelim (paper) dashboard and data to include 
  • Paper prototype: ready in 2 week (April 14th)
• Katia, contact Kenn to get a contact point/feedback on what they want with the dashboard. 
• Luis, review GDPR checks for the dashboard at 2022 ASF Community dashboard Dashboard - Launch Plan. Review the checks and modify what is needed (April 7)

Attendees:

• Anita Sarma (OSU)
• Mariam Guizani (OSU)
• Steve Feng (OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia) <lcanas@bitergia.com>

Agenda:

• Location: OSU and Bitergia have been talking about how the location can be collected from Github to improve the gender identification. Two options:
  • explore whether this is possible with the current platform
  • use the information provided by the platform and extend it "manually" with scripts
• Pilot (Intervention) project:
  • Due to Beam is not engaged with the project we wonder whether it is possible to pivot and choose another project. We are blocked by them so this is top priority.
  • Is there any other ASF project interested in DEI?
• Survey: it is needed to talk to Katia to approves the changes to be done in the survey
  • One of the Diversity Dimension that the survey currently misses is "disability" and Anita thinks that is an important dimension to consider
  • Here is the LF 2021 DEI report that lists their diversity dimension (pages 12-13): https://www.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/LFResearch_DEISurvey_Report_121321_6.pdf 
• Dashboard:
  • Bitergia has to review one of the charts to make sure they are doable with the platform
• Next meeting: from now on we will use this zoom https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82884207683?pwd=RUlCcHlyU2gxcUE1ZmFFL05KVU9EUT09

Attendees:

• Katia Rojas (ASF)
• Steve Feng (OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)

Agenda:

• Survey:
  • Bitergia/OSU: Disability question must be added to the doc
  • Document will be finished after this new question is added and validated by Katia
• Limesurvey:
  • Bitergia will sign the DPA (Data Processing Addendum). This must be included in the wiki we have with the GDPR checks.
  • Bitergia will double check that Christian & Katia validate the GDPR checks
  • Bitergia will double check that Limesurvey still works this way:
    • fits this description . In the GDPR checks we have this sentence "..We're doing this through the assignment of unique tokens that match an unsubscribe link. "
    • Reminders must be sent if a person did not opt-out or has already replied to the survey.
  • Bitergia will clarify whether sending a reminder to people who did not opt-out is allowed by GDPR
• Milestones:
  • We will try to send the survey before the end of May so we have both June and July to get answers.
• Dashboard
  • Bitergia/OSU will share a new mock-up of the dashboard with Katia

Attendees:

• Brittany Hermann (Beam team)
• Mariam Guizani (Bitergia/OSU)
• Zixuan Feng (Bitergia/OSU)
• Anita Sarma (Bitergia/OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)
  
  

Notes:

• Beam team:
  • We are waiting for feedback from Ken. Blocked until we get it.
• Dashboard:
  • Bitergia will create a copy of the indexes tomorrow morning so Marian and Zixuan can start extending the indexes
  • We will use the information from https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?beam
• Communication plan:
  • Bitergia will send a deadline to Ken so he can help us with the communication with the BEAM community
• Mailing lists:
  • Brittany confirmed the mailing lists to be analyzed is https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@beam.apache.org

Attendees:

• Brittany Hermann (Beam team)
• Mariam Guizani (Bitergia/OSU)
• Zixuan Feng (Bitergia/OSU)
• Anita Sarma (Bitergia/OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)

Notes:

• Survey. We have been reviewing the survey in Limesurvey, these are the actions items:
  • Action Items for Luis' team:
    • Is it possible to set only one "No answer" for all the subquestions in question like Q3
    • Bug in Q4 which seems to be mandatory while it should be optional
    • N/A will be replaced with "Not Applicable"
    • The style for Q12 should be improved to make it more readable
    • find out whether it is possible to have a go back button (or the go back from the web browser working)
  • Action Items for Anita's team:
    • Q6 and Q7. Should it be "check all that apply" question?
    • Q8 and Q9. Should they have a N/A column?
    • Review the subquestions of Q13
• Launch plan:
  • Luis will try to talk to Katia to see when we can test the invitation sent from her email address
  • We should define dates so we can start with the communication process

Notes:

• Luis will make sure the Blog post we have in the Google doc is ported to confluence
•  dates: Survey - Launch Plan

Attendees:

• Mariam Guizani (Bitergia/OSU)
• Zixuan Feng (Bitergia/OSU)
• Anita Sarma (Bitergia/OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)

Notes:

• Survey is waiting for the blog post to be published
• We are still blocked by the Beam team
  • In order to be able to deliver on time we will resume the work of the dashboard
• Next meeting: July 27th?
• Luis will be OOO starting on July 30th until August 15th

Attendees:

• Brittany Hermann (Beam)
• Danielle ?? (Beam)
• Mariam Guizani (Bitergia/OSU)
• Zixuan Feng (Bitergia/OSU)
• Anita Sarma (Bitergia/OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)

Notes:

• In order to try to get more answers with the help of Danielle we will extend the survey until Sunday (end of the day)
• We are still missing the feedback from Kenneth about the dashboard. We will have for his feedback until next Wed. If no feedback is provided we will try a plan b
  • Mariam contacted Aizhamal Nurmamat. She is very busy, so this is discarded as plan b
  • Pablo Estrada is also a PMC
• Questions for Katia:
  • Different analysis are possible: should we compare with the previous dashboard to see the differences or should we focus on this one?

Attendees:

• Katia Rojas (ASF)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)

Notes:

• Katia recommends to contact the person that could help us to unblock this as soon as possible. Luis will contact him this week.
• Luis will confirm whether this is the last prototype document we have, so we can share the information with Pablo Estrada.
• What is the analysis ASF wants from the survey data?:
  • Comparison with previous survey
  • Current status (analysis this survey)
•  What is the type of documentation ASF expects?
  
  • A deliverable with with the "numbers" and a new deliverable (or chapter) with the analysis and interpretation of those numbers. For the latter Bitergia/OSU will include a summary of the results, this would be the entry point for ASF marketing team.
• New schedule for the meeting. Katia's preference:
  • Thursday 6PM - 6:30PM CEST
  • Tuesday 6PM - 6:30PM CEST
• Luis will make a proposal for the next meetins after talking to the Bitergia/OSU team.

Attendees:

• Brittany Hermann (Beam)
• Danielle Syse (Beam)
• Anita Sarma (Bitergia/OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)
• Mariam Guizani (Bitergia/OSU)
• Zixuan Feng (Bitergia/OSU)

Notes:

• Brittany is leaving and Danielle is taking over from Google / Beam
• New schedule for the meetings to be compatible with Katia:
  • 9AM PDT / 6PM CEST
  • biweekly
• Mariam presented the prototype that will be presented to Kenneth on Monday at 1PM PDT / 10PM CEST
• Luis will ask Mariam about the links to be included in the menu of the dashboard
• Feedback:
  • Danielle/idea: offering the deltas (variation over previous periods of time)
  • Luis/fix: every widget should have a title
  • Luis/presentation:
    • focus on only a few charts and introduce how data was in the previous meeting
    • provide a couple of links to the dashboard so they can see it live
    • try to show only a chart per "row" with an explanation of what it is being shown. E.g., what data source is involved? all of them? only PRs?

• Anita Sarma (Bitergia/OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)
• Mariam Guizani (Bitergia/OSU)
• Zixuan Feng (Bitergia/OSU)
• Kenneth Knowles (Google/Beam)

• Beam moved to GitHub recently. They are creating a bunch of tickets that could be filter out with a pattern
• AI: Luis will clarify how the algorithm for the graph chart works. Are the nodes in the center the ones with more edges?

• Suggestions by Kenneth:

  • to use as input for the identities the .mailmap file at https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.mailmap

  • to pick up the company when having a company like Google and the Apache foundation.
    • less priority: gmail.com, then Apache
    • more priority to the companies who pay the salaries
  • to show the latency of the communication of two nodes in the network graph
    
    • option A: thin edges for longer interactions and thick edges for shorter interactions
    • option B: use the size of the node for the latency
    • option C: create a border for the latency (this involves heavy development)
  • AI mark as male: Yi Hu, Kerry D.. , Svetak Sundhar, Esun Kim and Yixiao Shen
  • Kenneth is interested in welcoming new contributors
  • he is slightly interested in seeing data for the creation of PR, standard comments and review comments
• AI: Luis will add Kenneth to the dashboard
• Next time: same time in October 17

Attendees:

• Katia Rojas (ASF)
• Danielle Syse (Beam)
• Anita Sarma (Bitergia/OSU)
• Mariam Guizani (Bitergia/OSU)
• Zixuan Feng (Bitergia/OSU)
• Luis Cañas-Díaz (Bitergia)

Notes:

• AI: Maria/Steve will send us a list of the FR suggested by Kenneth.
• We are having a meeting with Kenneth to show the latest results.
• OSU team presented a draft of the comparison between 2021 and 2022.
• AI: Katia asks for a draft of the comparison. This could be done by sharing a draft of the report or just a subsection.