Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

 

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-43

for implentations.*'s fix attributes that should show qnames as values

 

Conformance

(question)

ASSEMBLY-1

Is binding.sca always present?

If a component service is configured with binding.ws, can be accessed by a component reference in the same composite with binding.sca? Reference side is different now. When no bindings it dervies them from service
If service has binding.ws it doesn't have binding.sca

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-3

Is interface.java specification normative in SCA-Assembly spec?

No action is required

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-65

component type allows to specify wire targets on references

Push teh getTargets() method from Reference to ComponentReference

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-6

usage usage of not promoted references

Make sure the reference resolution follows what's described by the assembly spec

 

 

(tick) (question)

ASSEMBLY-23

SCA <anyAttribute.../> declarations should use namespace ##other rather than ##any

Update the xsd from OASIS

 

8

SCDL artifact resolution underspecified

Adjust the artifact resolution based on the proposal in this JIRA

TUSCANY-3079

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-14

Conflicting Specification of Values for Many-Valued StringProperties

Adjust the property value processing to conform to the new syntax, Can't have multiple properties with the same name

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-25

Can Implementation change property values after instantiaion

No action is required

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-28

Missing XSD for contributions

Update the xsd from OASIS. Update the Import/Export model to
be extensible as the XSD allows xsd:any and xsd:anyAttribute

 

16

Component URI is not well described

Tuscany needs to support the structural URI based on this proposal

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-17

Need to define Namespace handling for included Composites

Tuscany needs to adjust how the composite include is aggregated based on the proposal in this JIRA

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-18

XSD definitions of Component Service and Component Referencehave unintended features

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-38

Clarify whether a Default Value for a Property must appear inthe componentType of an implementation

No action is required

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-39

Permit intents and PolicySets on <interface/> elements

The policy model needs to be changed so that interface can have intents/policySets attached.

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-40

Autowire at the domain level

Tuscany needs to decide if/how it will support the domain-level autowiring

22

WSDL extension should not be required for conversations

Make sure conversational intent is supported at interface and service

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-42

Autowire value for the logical domain composite

I think Tuscany is OK here as the autowire=false for the domain composite

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-57

Unresolved bindings on references

Add the support for "componentName/serviceName/bindingName" as the wire target

 

23

SCA <anyAttribute.../> declarations should use namespace ##other rather than ##any

Update the xsd from OASIS, can we support OSOA and OASIS xsds?

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-25

Can Implementation change property values after instantiaion

No action is required

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-67

Component Type file name is too restrictive

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-6826

SCA Composite Visibility

This seems to be a clarification by the spec ComponentType Properties should not have a source

 

 

(tick) (question)

ASSEMBLY-3528

Missing XSD for contributions

Update the xsd from OASIS. Update the Import/Export model to
be extensible as the XSD allows xsd:any and xsd:anyAttribute Confusing words in Section 5.3 relating to ConversationalIntent

 

 

(tick) (minus)

ASSEMBLY-3230

Incorrect description of <Operation/> child elements inAssembly

I see this conflicts with  http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-58 Policy-58 did win and operation elements are no longer required

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-32

"SCA schema fixes requested for sca-core.xsd (based on "SCA schema fixes requested for sca-core.xsd (based on OSOA site versions that may be copied to OASIS site)"

 

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-60

Description elements in SCDL

33

Long-Running Request-Response Operations

Tuscany needs to support the proposal

  Support documentation element in the model and processors

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-5335

Confusing words in Section 5.3 relating to ConversationalIntent , Conversational support has gone

  No schema or extension model definitions for contributions

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-536

Compatability of component type allows to specify wire targets on references side files

Each implementation type has to decide how to support the componentType file

  Push teh getTargets() method from Reference to ComponentReference

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-9238

Clarify whether a Default Value for a Property must appear inthe componentType of an implementation

No action is required Assembly Specification should not state what marks a Javainterface as Local

 

 

(tick) (question)

ASSEMBLY-71 Implementation.composite pseudo-schema incorrect 39

Permit intents and PolicySets on <interface/> elements

The policy model needs to be changed so that interface can have intents/policySets attached.

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-14

Conflicting Specification of Values for Many-Valued StringProperties

40

Autowire at the domain level

Tuscany needs to decide if/how it will support the domain-level autowiring

  Adjust the property value processing to conform to the new syntax

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-22

WSDL extension should not be required for conversations

Make sure conversational intent is supported at interface and service

 

41

Conflicting domain-level <wire> deployments

Tuscany needs to implement the proposal

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-18

XSD definitions of Component Service and Component Referencehave unintended features

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-63

Specification wording unclear on how local and remoteable interfaces are specified

42

Autowire value for the logical domain composite

I think Tuscany is OK here as the autowire=false for the domain composite

  Remotable is IDL specific

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-6543

for implentations.*'s fix attributes that should show qnames as values

  Constraining Type talks about non-optional references but does not define what they are

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-77

How to map WSDL 1.1. portType to WSDL 2.0 interface and vice versa?

44

Allow multiple definitions.xml files

Tuscany should allow META-INF/definitions.xml from SCA contributions. These definitions become visible to the SCA domain

  Remove the wsdl2.0 specfics from sca namespace. Potentially add interface.wsdl2 under tuscany ns

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-69

Language neutrality edits

 

 

45

some

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-45

some smaller things we need to fix in the assembly specification

 

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-56

Need to clarify definition of Bidirectional Interfaces

Make sure Tuscany is consistent with the specified behavior

 

51

Composite Completeness

Tuscany needs to add more validations to ensure the completeness of the composite for implementaiton.composite

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-53

No schema or extension model definitions for contributions

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-41

Conflicting domain-level <wire> deployments

Tuscany needs to implement the proposal

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-79

Identifying wire format and operation selection

56

Need to clarify definition of Bidirectional Interfaces

Make sure Tuscany is consistent with the specified behavior

  add "wireFormat" and "operationSelector" for bindings

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-6257

Unresolved bindings on references

Add the support for "componentName/serviceName/bindingName" as the wire target

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-60

Description elements in SCDL

Support documentation element in the model and processors

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-62

What is the default What is the default value for many and mustSupply on Properties?

remove "mustSupply" from <component>

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-26

SCA Composite Visibility

This seems to be a clarification by the spec

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-51

Composite Completeness

Tuscany needs to add more validations to ensure the completeness of the composite for implementaiton.composite

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-36

Compatability of component type side files

Each implementation type has to decide how to support the componentType file

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-44

Allow multiple definitions.xml files

Tuscany should allow META-INF/definitions.xml from SCA contributions. These definitions become visible to the SCA domain

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-89

Need for a Callback annotation for WSDL interface files

Tuscany needs to handle sca:callback extensibility elements in WSDL

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-16

Component URI is not well described

Tuscany needs to support the structural URI based on this proposal

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-8

SCDL artifact resolution underspecified

Adjust the artifact resolution based on the proposal in this JIRA

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-17

Need to define Namespace handling for included Composites

Tuscany needs to adjust how the composite include is aggregated based on the proposal in this JIRA

 

63

Specification wording unclear on how local and remoteable interfaces are specified

Remotable is IDL specific

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-65

Constraining Type talks about non-optional references but does not define what they are

 

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-67

Component Type file name is too restrictive Assembly has washed itself somewhat of ComponentType files Up to C&I to define what to do, BPEL has got rid of them, Tuscany should ignore for 2.x

 

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-68

ComponentType Properties should not have a source

 

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-69

Language neutrality edits

 

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-71

Implementation.composite pseudo-schema incorrect

 

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-72

Do we need appendix A (pseudo-schema)?

No action is required

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-74

Corrections to the contributions schema, sca-contribution.xml specify what is deployable We should use in our samples

See ASSEMLY-28

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-75

"Section on ""Wire"" in Appendix is Incorrect"

Tuscany already has the correct model, No action is required

 

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-77

How to map WSDL 1.1. portType to WSDL 2.0 interface and vice versa?

Remove the wsdl2.0 specfics from sca namespace. Potentially add interface.wsdl2 under tuscany ns

 

(minus)

ASSEMBLY-30

Incorrect description of <Operation/> child elements inAssembly

I see this conflicts with  http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-58

 

(question)

ASSEMBLY-33

Long-Running Request-Response Operations

Tuscany needs to support the proposal

 

79

Identifying wire format and operation selection

add "wireFormat" and "operationSelector" for bindings

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-96

Add a Section documenting naming conventions to the start ofthe SCA Assembly Specification

No action is required

 

(tick)

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-74

Corrections to the contributions schema

See ASSEMLY-28

 

ASSEMBLY-81

Duplicated atributes in sca-binding-sca.xsd and sca-implementation-composite.xsd

No action is required

 

 

(tick) (question)

ASSEMBLY-75

"Section on ""Wire"" in Appendix is Incorrect"

89

Need for a Callback annotation for WSDL interface files

Tuscany needs to handle sca:callback extensibility elements in WSDL

  Tuscany already has the correct model, No action is required

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-7292

Assembly Specification should not state what marks a Javainterface as Local

 

 

 

(tick)

ASSEMBLY-96

Add a Section documenting naming conventions to the start ofthe SCA Assembly Specification

Do we need appendix A (pseudo-schema)?

No action is required

 

 

(tick)

Java

OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_JavaAnnotationsAndAPIs_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA

N/A

No @replace attribute for <wire> in OSOA spec

No action is required

 

 

(tick)

N/A

No <value> subelement for property in OSOA spec, so ASM50028,ASM50029 in OASIS spec couldn't be tested for vtest code.

No action is required

 

 

(tick)

N/A

Top level composite services/references are not included in the virtual domain composite

Adjust logic and tests

 

 

Policy

OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_Policy_Framework_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-policy-11.1-spec-wd-10

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

Conformance

 

POLICY-7

Implicit addition of intents based on a service or reference's @requires list

 

 

 

 

POLICY-8

Include definition on 'conversational' intent as mentioned in SCA Assembly

 

 

 

 

POLICY-15

External mechanism for attaching intents or policySets

 

 

 

 

POLICY-17

Need Transaction Policy Spec

 

 

 

 

POLICY-18

Should qualifiable intents have a default qualifier

 

 

 

 

POLICY-22

Profile intent extension - provides other intents

 

 

 

 

POLICY-24

More direct, structural qualifier definition

 

 

 

 

POLICY-26

Security implementation policy should be validate-able by schema

 

 

 

 

POLICY-29

Need more precision on when policies in a policySet are in effect

 

 

 

 

POLICY-37

The URL for the location of the ws-policy.xsd is incorrect.

 

 

 

 

POLICY-38

Improve description of the overides available to the two different hierarchies in SCA

 

 

 

 

POLICY-39

Need Support for Mutually exclusive intents

 

 

 

 

POLICY-40

Fix SCA Policy schema complex types for Qualifier and PolicySet

 

 

 

 

POLICY-42

Infoset for policySet/@appliesTo

 

 

 

 

POLICY-44

Need a clear way to distinguish Implementation Intents from Interaction Intents

 

 

 

 

POLICY-46

How to configure policySets

 

 

 

 

POLICY-52

Policy algorithm gets required intents from what interfaces definitions/declarations?

 

 

 

 

POLICY-53

How do we tell what a policySet @provides?

 

 

 

 

POLICY-54

Wire validation rules have changed

 

 

 

 

POLICY-55

Clarify the handling of Intents

 

 

 

 

POLICY-56

Intents which conflict with binding configuration

 

 

 

(question)

POLICY-58

Remove <operation/> elements from the specification

 

 

 

(question)

POLICY-59

Limit policySet attachment to bindings

 

 

 

(question)

POLICY-60

Clarify scope of ordered intent

Add "ordered" intent support

 

 

(tick)

POLICY-61

How are mayProvide intents on bindings satisfied

 

 

 

(tick)

POLICY-63

intents names defined by SCA should be defined using camel case

 

 

 

Implementations

Implementation-java

OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_JavaAnnotationsAndAPIs_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

Conformance

(tick)

JAVA-5

EJB remove method on EJBHome

 

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-20

annotations on parameters

@Reference, @Property can only be used for constructor parameters. Tuscany
may need to report violations
<lresende> ReferenceProcessorTestCase and PropertyProcessorTestCase already test proper violation reports as in the specs </lresende>

 

 

(question)

JAVA-21

Clarify Request Scope lifetime

Remove the Request scope

TUSCANY-3280

 

(tick)

JAVA-32

Incorrect generated service name

 

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-41

Inconsistent method description for @Init and @Destroy annotations

Tuscany already validates the pattern

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-42

Incorrect examples of methods annotated @Init and @Destroy

 

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-43

@Reference annotation can also be used on a constructor parameter.

 

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-47

Missing description of what the @EagerInit annotation does

 

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-48

@Callback annotation does not feature in section on Interfaces

 

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-49

Version requirements for SDO, JAXB and JAX-WS

 

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

(tick)

JAVA-112

Spurious cast() method definition in ComponentContext interface

 

 

(question)

JAVA-111

Constructor name information may not be available

55

SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define the ComponentType of a Java implementation

Check the compontType to see if it matches the rules defined by this proposal

  Adjust the @Property/@Reference processor on CDI

 

(tick)

JAVA-8456

When more than one interface with the same unqualified name used in the @Service annotation

  Java CAA spec does not contain the interface.java schema

 

 

(tick) (question)

JAVA-8357

SCA Spring Client and Implementation Specification uses an unacceptable namespace

Update the namespace based on the OASIS spec Incorrect definition of the SCA JEE JSP Tag library

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-8261

Describe the concurrency model for each scope

  Inconsistent use of a and an when referring to annotations

 

 

(tick) (question)

JAVA-8164

Normative references to SCA Spec docs point to v1.00 docs

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-79

Missing word "type" for "return type" in CAA spec - sec 3.1

SCA Spring C & I specification does not state the purpose of sca:composite element

Remove the sca:composite

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-75

Incorrect description of @Scope annotation default

Make sure the scope is default to "COMPOSITE" if there is an @Conversational

 

71

Incorrect code in section 6.7.2 example

 

(tick)

JAVA-73

Incorrect reference to "original request"

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-72

Should not say callback ID is passed in reference parameters

 

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-71

Incorrect code in section 6.7.2 example

 

 

(question)

JAVA-64

SCA Spring C & I specification does not state the purpose of sca:composite element

73

Incorrect reference to "original request"

 

  Remove the sca:composite

 

(tick)

JAVA-6175

Incorrect description of @Scope annotation default

Make sure the scope is default to "COMPOSITE" if there is an @Conversational Describe the concurrency model for each scope

 

 

(question) (tick)

JAVA-57

SCA Spring Client and Implementation Specification uses an unacceptable namespace

Update the namespace based on the OASIS spec

 

79

Missing word "type" for "return type" in CAA spec - sec 3.1

 

(tick)

JAVA-56

When more than one interface with the same unqualified name used in the @Service annotation

 

 

(question) (tick)

JAVA-5581

SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define the ComponentType of a Java implementation

Normative references to SCA Spec docs point to v1.00 docs

 

  Check the compontType to see if it matches the rules defined by this proposal

 

(tick)

JAVA-4982

Inconsistent use of a and an when referring to annotations

  Version requirements for SDO, JAXB and JAX-WS

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-4883

Incorrect definition of the SCA JEE JSP Tag library

  @Callback annotation does not feature in section on Interfaces

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-4784

Java CAA spec does not contain the interface.java schema

  Missing description of what the @EagerInit annotation does

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-43112

Spurious cast() method definition in ComponentContext interface

  @Reference annotation can also be used on a constructor parameter.

 

 

(tick) (question)

JAVA-42 Incorrect examples of methods annotated @Init and @Destroy 111

Constructor name information may not be available

Adjust the @Property/@Reference processor on CDI

 

 

(tick)

JAVA-41

Inconsistent method description for @Init and @Destroy annotations

Tuscany already validates the pattern

 

(question)

N/A

Support for @Remote attribute in in <interface.java/>

 

TUSCANY-3290

(tick)

JAVA-32

Incorrect generated service name

 

 

(question)

JAVA-21

Clarify Request Scope lifetime

N/A

Illegal annotations in a service interface class Remove the Request scope

 

(question)

JAVA TUSCANY-203289

annotations on parameters

@Reference, @Property can only be used for constructor parameters. Tuscany
may need to report violations

 

(tick)

JAVA-5

EJB remove method on EJBHome

 

 

Policy

OSOA - Tuscany 1.x (SCA_Policy_Framework_V100 +)
OASIS - sca-policy-11.1-spec-wd-10

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY

 

(question)

N/A

Support JAX-WS Client Asynchronous API for a Synchronous Service as described in Java CAA

 

TUSCANY-3294

 

(question)

N/A

Update SCA Annotation definitions in sca-api to match the OASIS 1.1 Java CAA Specification

 

TUSCANY-3293

 

(question)

N/A

Verify @Service compliance with latest OASIS Java 1.1 draft spec

 

TUSCANY-3300

 

(question)

N/A

Verify @Property compliance with latest OASIS Java 1.1 draft spec

 

TUSCANY-3301

 

Bindings

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS

Binding-jms

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

Conformance

 

BINDINGS-1

JMSDeliveryMode, JMSTimeToLive and JMSPriority defined as types different from what the JMS specification uses.

 

 

 

 

BINDINGS-5

JMS bindingType and atLeastOne intent overlaps with setting JMSDeliveryMode

 

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

(tick)

POLICY-63

intents names defined by SCA should be defined using camel case

 

 

(tick)

POLICY-61

How are mayProvide intents on bindings satisfied

 

 

(question)

POLICY-60

Clarify scope of ordered intent

Add "ordered" intent support

 

(question)

POLICY-59

Limit policySet attachment to bindings

 

 

(question)

POLICY-58

Remove <operation/> elements from the specification

 

 

 

POLICY-56

Intents which conflict with binding configuration

 

 

 

POLICY-55

Clarify the handling of Intents

 

 

 

POLICY-54

BINDINGS-6

JMS bindingType and conversation intent

  Wire validation rules have changed

 

 

 

POLICY-53

BINDINGS-8

JMS bindingType and ordered intent - clarification needed

  How do we tell what a policySet @provides?

 

 

 

POLICYBINDINGS-5212

Are JMS message selectors supported?

  Policy algorithm gets required intents from what interfaces definitions/declarations?

 

 

 

POLICY-46

BINDINGS-13

What namespace(s) do we use for each binding?

  How to configure policySets

 

 

 

POLICY-44

BINDINGS-17

Rules for Binding compatibility

  Need a clear way to distinguish Implementation Intents from Interaction Intents

 

 

 

POLICYBINDINGS-4218

Clarify the rules on which queues are used for responses and callbacks Infoset for policySet/@appliesTo

 

 

 

(question)

POLICYBINDINGS-40 Fix SCA Policy schema complex types for Qualifier and PolicySet 20

JMS binding URI should follow JMS IRI scheme submitted to IETF

 

 

 

(question)

BINDINGS-26

JMS binding pseudo-schemas inconsistent with assembly

 

POLICY-39

Need Support for Mutually exclusive intents

 

 

 

POLICY-38

BINDINGS-29

Properties on Bindings Improve description of the overides available to the two different hierarchies in SCA

 

 

 

(tick)

POLICY-37

BINDINGS-30

Normative reference consistency

  The URL for the location of the ws-policy.xsd is incorrect.

 

 

 

POLICYBINDINGS-2931

What is a "plain name" for a connection factories or activation specs, and how is one distinguished from a JNDI name?

  Need more precision on when policies in a policySet are in effect

 

 

 

POLICYBINDINGS-2632

Document the attributes inherited from the base definition provided by SCA Assembly specification.

  Security implementation policy should be validate-able by schema

 

 

 

POLICYBINDINGS-2433

Correlation property names are odd, and the space of options is not extensible.

  More direct, structural qualifier definition

 

 

 

POLICY-22

BINDINGS-34

Clarify default function selection and data binding behavior

  Profile intent extension - provides other intents

 

 

 

POLICY-18

BINDINGS-35

Allow topics anywhere that queues can be used

  Should qualifiable intents have a default qualifier

 

 

 

POLICY-17

BINDINGS-38

Clarify use of URI vs. uri

  Need Transaction Policy Spec

 

 

 

POLICY-15

BINDINGS-40

Clarify rules around combination of destination, CF and AS elements

  External mechanism for attaching intents or policySets

 

 

 

POLICYBINDINGS-848

How are mayProvide intents on bindings satisfied Include definition on 'conversational' intent as mentioned in SCA Assembly

 

 

 

(tick)

POLICYBINDINGS-762

Conformance statement numbering Implicit addition of intents based on a service or reference's @requires list

 

 

Bindings

...

 

Binding-ws

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

Conformance

 

BINDINGS-38

Clarify use of URI vs. uri

 

 

2

How should SCA callback semantics be carried over Web Services?

 

 

BINDINGS-36

Does WSDL binding take precedend over policy intents

 

 

 

BINDINGS-353

portType referred to inconsistently throughout specification

  Allow topics anywhere that queues can be used

 

 

 

BINDINGS-348

No bindingType for binding.ws

  Clarify default function selection and data binding behavior

 

 

 

BINDINGS-33

Correlation property names are odd, and the space of options is not extensible.

 

 

9

Use of wsdli:wsdlLocation does not match WSDL 2.0 specification

 

 

BINDINGS-26

JMS binding pseudo-schemas inconsistent with assembly

 

 

 

BINDINGS-2010

Rules for WSDL generation create invalid WSDL by using "/" where it is not allowed.

  JMS binding URI should follow JMS IRI scheme submitted to IETF

 

 

 

BINDINGS-1913

What namespace(s) do we use for each binding?

  Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.binding with reference targets

 

 

 

BINDINGS-1815

Namespace/location for WS-Addressing is incorrect in WebService binding spec/XSD

  Clarify the rules on which queues are used for responses and callbacks

 

 

 

BINDINGS-1716

binding.ws reference to assembly spec for interface mapping is incorrect

  Rules for Binding compatibility

 

 

 

BINDINGS-1617

Rules for Binding compatibility

  binding.ws reference to assembly spec for interface mapping is incorrect

 

 

 

BINDINGS-1519

Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.binding with reference targets

  Namespace/location for WS-Addressing is incorrect in WebService binding spec/XSD

 

 

 

BINDINGS-1323

@wsdlElement definition needs clarification on "equivalent" and use of WSDL 2.0 constructs

  What namespace(s) do we use for each binding?

 

 

 

BINDINGS-1229

Properties on Bindings

  Are JMS message selectors supported?

 

 

 

BINDINGS-1030

Normative reference consistency

  Rules for WSDL generation create invalid WSDL by using "/" where it is not allowed.

 

 

 

BINDINGS-932

Document the attributes inherited from the base definition provided by SCA Assembly specification.

  Use of wsdli:wsdlLocation does not match WSDL 2.0 specification

 

 

 

BINDINGS-836

Does WSDL binding take precedend over policy intents

  No bindingType for binding.ws

 

 

 

BINDINGS-6 JMS bindingType and conversation intent 38

Clarify use of URI vs. uri

 

 

 

BINDINGS-5

JMS bindingType and atLeastOne intent overlaps with setting JMSDeliveryMode

 

 

BPEL

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

Conformance

 

BPEL-1

support for BPEL4WS 1.1

 

 

BINDINGS-3

portType referred to inconsistently throughout specification

 

 

 

BINDINGSBPEL-12

Does the spec allow a componentType side file

 

  JMSDeliveryMode, JMSTimeToLive and JMSPriority defined as types different from what the JMS specification uses.

 

 

BPEL

...

-3

Correlation disagreement between SCA and BPEL

 

 

 

OASIS JIRA

Description

Tuscany TODO

Tuscany JIRA

 

BPEL-209

SCA-BPEL spec can not require bpel:mustUnderstand to be true

 

 

XML Namespaces

 

 

 

 

BPEL-10

test issue please ignore

 

 

BPEL-19

SCA-BPEL XML Schema

 

 

 

BPEL-1713

ComponentType should not contain implementation.bpel

  Allow Component Type side file to override defaults for service/reference

 

 

 

BPEL-14

Allow sca-aware processes to specify everything that can be specified in a CT side file

 

 

 

BPEL-13

ComponentType should not contain implementation.bpel

 

 

 

BPEL-1017

Allow Component Type side file to override defaults for service/reference

  test issue please ignore

 

 

 

BPEL-919

SCA-BPEL XML Namespaces Schema

 

 

 

 

BPEL-320

Correlation disagreement between SCA and BPEL

 

 

 

BPEL-2

Does the spec allow a componentType side file

 

 

SCA-BPEL spec can not require bpel:mustUnderstand to be true

 

 

BPEL-1

support for BPEL4WS 1.1