Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3

...

Avro

...

Component

...

Available

...

as

...

of

...

Camel

...

2.10

...

This

...

component

...

provides

...

a

...

dataformat

...

for

...

avro,

...

which

...

allows

...

serialization

...

and

...

deserialization

...

of

...

messages

...

using

...

Apache

...

Avro's

...

binary

...

dataformat.

...

Moreover,

...

it

...

provides

...

support

...

for

...

Apache

...

Avro's

...

rpc,

...

by

...

providing

...

producers

...

and

...

consumers

...

endpoint

...

for

...

using

...

avro

...

over

...

netty

...

or

...

http.

...

Maven

...

users

...

will

...

need

...

to

...

add

...

the

...

following

...

dependency

...

to

...

their

...

pom.xml

...

for

...

this

...

component:

Code Block
xml
xml

{code:xml}
<dependency>
    <groupId>org.apache.camel</groupId>
    <artifactId>camel-avro</artifactId>
    <version>x.x.x</version>
    <!-- use the same version as your Camel core version -->
</dependency>

Apache Avro Overview

Avro allows you to define message types and a protocol using a json like format and then generate java code for the specified types and messages. An example of how a schema looks like is below.

Code Block
xml
xml
{code}

h3. Apache Avro Overview

Avro allows you to define message types and a protocol using a json like format and then generate java code for the specified types and messages. An example of how a schema looks like is below.

{code:xml}
{"namespace": "org.apache.camel.avro.generated",
 "protocol": "KeyValueProtocol",

 "types": [
     {"name": "Key", "type": "record",
      "fields": [
          {"name": "key",   "type": "string"}
      ]
     },
     {"name": "Value", "type": "record",
      "fields": [
          {"name": "value",   "type": "string"}
      ]
     }
 ],

 "messages": {
     "put": {
         "request": [{"name": "key", "type": "Key"}, {"name": "value", "type": "Value"} ],
         "response": "null"
     },
     "get": {
         "request": [{"name": "key", "type": "Key"}],
         "response": "Value"
     }
 }
}
{code}

You

...

can

...

easily

...

generate

...

classes

...

from

...

a

...

schema,

...

using

...

maven,

...

ant

...

etc.

...

More

...

details

...

can

...

be

...

found

...

at

...

the

...

Apache

...

Avro

...

documentation

...

.

However,

...

it

...

doesn't

...

enforce

...

a

...

schema

...

first

...

approach

...

and

...

you

...

can

...

create

...

schema

...

for

...

your

...

existing

...

classes.

...

Since

...

2.12

...

you

...

can

...

use

...

existing

...

protocol

...

interfaces

...

to

...

make

...

RCP

...

calls.

...

You

...

should

...

use

...

interface

...

for

...

the

...

protocol

...

itself

...

and

...

POJO

...

beans

...

or

...

primitive/String

...

classes

...

for

...

parameter

...

and

...

result

...

types.

...

Here

...

is

...

an

...

example

...

of

...

the

...

class

...

that

...

corresponds

...

to

...

schema

...

above:

Code Block
java
java


{code:java}
package org.apache.camel.avro.reflection;

public interface KeyValueProtocol {
    void put(String key, Value value);
    Value get(String key);
}

class Value {
    private String value;
    public String getValue() { return value; }
    public void setValue(String value) { this.value = value; }
}
{code}
_

Note:

...

Existing

...

classes

...

can

...

be

...

used

...

only

...

for

...

RPC

...

(see

...

below),

...

not

...

in

...

data

...

format.

Using the Avro data format

Using the avro data format is as easy as specifying that the class that you want to marshal or unmarshal in your route.

Code Block
xml
xml
_

h3. Using the Avro data format

Using the avro data format is as easy as specifying that the class that you want to marshal or unmarshal in your route.

{code:xml}
    <camelContext id="camel" xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring">
        <route>
            <from uri="direct:in"/>
            <marshal>
                <avro instanceClass="org.apache.camel.dataformat.avro.Message"/>
            </marshal>
            <to uri="log:out"/>
        </route>
    </camelContext>
{code}

An

...

alternative

...

can

...

be

...

to

...

specify

...

the

...

dataformat

...

inside the

...

context

...

and

...

reference

...

it

...

from

...

your

...

route.

Code Block
xml
xml


{code:xml}
    <camelContext id="camel" xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring">
         <dataFormats>
            <avro id="avro" instanceClass="org.apache.camel.dataformat.avro.Message"/>
        </dataFormats>
        <route>
            <from uri="direct:in"/>
            <marshal ref="avro"/>
            <to uri="log:out"/>
        </route>
    </camelContext>
{code}

In

...

the

...

same

...

manner

...

you

...

can

...

umarshal

...

using

...

the

...

avro

...

data

...

format.

...

Using

...

Avro

...

RPC

...

in

...

Camel

...

As

...

mentioned

...

above

...

Avro

...

also

...

provides

...

RPC

...

support

...

over

...

multiple

...

transports

...

such

...

as

...

http

...

and

...

netty.

...

Camel

...

provides

...

consumers

...

and

...

producers

...

for

...

these

...

two

...

transports.

{
Code Block
}
avro:[transport]:[host]:[port]
{code}
The supported transport values are currently http or netty.

*Since 2.12* you can specify message name right in the URI:
{code[?options]

The supported transport values are currently http or netty.

Since 2.12 you can specify message name right in the URI:

Code Block
}
avro:[transport]:[host]:[port][/messageName][?options]

For consumers this allows you to have multiple routes attached to the same socket. Dispatching to correct route will be done by the avro component automatically. Route with no messageName specified (if any) will be used as default.

When using camel producers for avro ipc, the "in" message body needs to contain the parameters of the operation specified in the avro protocol. The response will be added in the body of the "out" message.

In a similar manner when using camel avro consumers for avro ipc, the requests parameters will be placed inside the "in" message body of the created exchange and once the exchange is processed the body of the "out" message will be send as a response.

Note: By default consumer parameters are wrapped into array. If you've got only one parameter, since 2.12 you can use singleParameter URI option to receive it direcly in the "in" message body without array wrapping.

Avro RPC URI Options

Div
classconfluenceTableSmall

Name

Version

Description

protocolClassName

 

The class name of the avro protocol.

singleParameter

2.12

If true, consumer parameter won't be wrapped into array. Will fail if protocol specifies more then 1 parameter for the message

protocol

 

Avro procol object. Can be used instead of protocolClassName when complex protocol needs to be created. One cane used #name notation to refer beans from the Registry

reflectionProtocol

2.12

If protocol object provided is reflection protocol. Should be used only with protocol parameter because for protocolClassName protocol type will be autodetected

Avro RPC Headers

Div
classconfluenceTableSmall

Name

Description

CamelAvroMessageName

The name of the message to send. In consumer overrides message name from URI (if any)

Examples

An example of using camel avro producers via http:

Code Block
xml
xml

{code}

For consumers this allows you to have multiple routes attach to the same socket. Dispatching to correct route will be done by the avro component automatically. Route with no messageName specified (if any) will be used as default. 

When using camel producers for avro ipc, the "in" message body needs to contain the parameters of the operation specified in the avro protocol. The response will be added in the body of the "out" message.

In a similar manner when using camel avro consumers for avro ipc, the requests parameters will be placed inside the "in" message body of the created exchange and once the exchange is processed the body of the "out" message will be send as a response.

*Note:* By default consumer parameters are wrapped into array. If you've got only one parameter, *since 2.12* you can use {{singleParameter}} URI option to receive it direcly in the "in" message body without array wrapping.

h3. Avro RPC URI Options

{div:class=confluenceTableSmall}
|| Name || Version || Description ||
| {{protocolClassName}} | | The class name of the avro protocol. |
| {{singleParameter}} | 2.12 | If true, consumer parameter won't be wrapped into array. Will fail if protocol specifies more then 1 parameter for the message |
| {{protocol}} | | Avro procol object. Can be used instead of {{protocolClassName}} when complex protocol needs to be created. One cane used #name notation to refer beans from the Registry |
| {{reflectionProtocol}} | 2.12 | If protocol object provided is reflection protocol. Should be used only with {{protocol}} parameter because for {{protocolClassName}} protocol type will be autodetected |
{div}

h3. Avro RPC Headers

{div:class=confluenceTableSmall}
|| Name || Description ||
| {{CamelAvroMessageName}} | The name of the message to send. In consumer overrides message name from URI (if any)|
{div}


h3. Examples

An example of using camel avro producers via http:

{code:xml}
        <route>
            <from uri="direct:start"/>
            <to uri="avro:http:localhost:{{avroport}}?protocolClassName=org.apache.camel.avro.generated.KeyValueProtocol"/>
            <to uri="log:avro"/>
        </route>
{code}

In

...

the

...

example

...

above

...

you

...

need

...

to

...

fill

...

CamelAvroMessageName

...

header.

...

Since

...

2.12

...

you

...

can

...

use

...

following

...

syntax

...

to

...

call

...

constant

...

messages:

Code Block
xml
xml

 
{code:xml}
        <route>
            <from uri="direct:start"/>
            <to uri="avro:http:localhost:{{avroport}}/put?protocolClassName=org.apache.camel.avro.generated.KeyValueProtocol"/>
            <to uri="log:avro"/>
        </route>
{code}

An

...

example

...

of

...

consuming

...

messages

...

using

...

camel

...

avro

...

consumers

...

via

...

netty:

Code Block
xml
xml


{code:xml}
        <route>
            <from uri="avro:netty:localhost:{{avroport}}?protocolClassName=org.apache.camel.avro.generated.KeyValueProtocol"/>
            <choice>
                <when>
                    <el>${in.headers.CamelAvroMessageName == 'put'}</el>
                    <process ref="putProcessor"/>
                </when>
                <when>
                    <el>${in.headers.CamelAvroMessageName == 'get'}</el>
                    <process ref="getProcessor"/>
                </when>
            </choice>
        </route>
{code}

*Since 

Since 2.12

...

you

...

can

...

set

...

up

...

two

...

distinct

...

routes

...

to

...

perform

...

the

...

same

...

task:

Code Block
xml
xml


{code:xml}
        <route>
            <from uri="avro:netty:localhost:{{avroport}}/put?protocolClassName=org.apache.camel.avro.generated.KeyValueProtocol">
            <process ref="putProcessor"/>
        </route>
        <route>
            <from uri="avro:netty:localhost:{{avroport}}/get?protocolClassName=org.apache.camel.avro.generated.KeyValueProtocol&singleParameter=true"/>
            <process ref="getProcessor"/>
        </route>
{code}

In

...

the

...

example

...

above,

...

get

...

takes

...

only

...

one

...

parameter,

...

so

...

singleParameter

...

is

...

used

...

and

...

getProcessor

...

will

...

receive

...

Value

...

class

...

directly

...

in

...

body,

...

while

...

putProcessor

...

will

...

receive

...

an

...

array

...

of

...

size

...

2

...

with

...

String

...

key

...

and

...

Value

...

value

...

filled

...

as

...

array

...

contents.

...