Table of Contents |
---|
WARN: This is an obsolete design. The design that's implemented in Kafka 0.9.0 is described in this wiki.
The following is a draft design that uses a high-available consumer coordinator at the broker side to handle consumer rebalance. By migrating the rebalance logic from the consumer to the coordinator we can resolve the consumer split brain problem and help thinner the consumer client. With this design we hope to incorporates:
...
1.
...
Motivation
The motivation of moving to a new set of consumer client APIs with broker side co-ordination is laid out here. Some back of the envelope calculations along with experience of building a prototype for this suggest that with With a single coordinator we should support up to 5K consumers (the bottleneck should be the number of socket channels a single machine can have), and by adding more coordinator (we can enable every broker to be a coordinator, so the maximum of coordinator is . Every broker will be the co-ordinator for a subset of consumer groups, thereby, providing the ability to scale the number of consumer groups linearly with the size of the server cluster), the scalability of the consumer will increase linearly.
2. Rebalancing Algorithm Overview
cluster.
2. Group management protocol
Rebalancing is the process where a group of consumer instances (belonging to the same group) co-ordinate to own a mutually exclusive set of partitions of topics that the group has subscribed to. At the end of a successful rebalance operation for a consumer group, every partition for all subscribed topics will be owned by a single consumer instance. The way rebalancing works is as follows. One of the brokers is elected as the coordinator for all a subset of the consumer groups. It will be responsible for triggering rebalancing attempts for certain consumer groups on consumer group membership changes or interested subscribed topic partition changes. It will also be responsible for communicating the resulting partition-consumer ownership configuration to all consumers of the group under undergoing a rebalance . More specifically, it will try to do the following:
Detecting newly started consumers. The coordinator will not try to discover new consumers but wait for the consumers to try to connect to it. When a new connection request has been received by the coordinator, it will receive the registration request from the new consumer. If the consumer's config options are valid, it accepts the registration, record the consumer's meta information such as session timeout value and number of streams per topic that the consumer is interested in, and sends back a connection established acknowledgment.
<-- (register) -- Consumer (startup)
Coordinator <-- (register) -- Consumer (startup)
<-- (register) -- Consumer (startup)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(record metadata) - (confirm) -> Consumer (register succeed, block reading for coordinator requests such as ping, stop-fetcher, start-fetcher)
Coordinator (record metadata) - (confirm) -> Consumer (same as above)
-- (reject) --> Consumer (register failed due to some invalid meta info, try to reconnect to the coordinator and register again)
Detecting consumer failure. For every registered consumer, the coordinator will check its liveness through periodic heartbeats. The heartbeat response should include the consumed offset per partition if auto-offset-commit is enabled. If the consumer fails to reply to a heartbeat for configured number of times, the coordinator will mark the consumer as failed and trigger the rebalance procedure for the group this consumer belongs to.
Coordinator -- (ping) --> Consumer (alive)
- (ping) -> Consumer (failed)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coordinator (record offset) <-- (reply) -- Consumer (alive)
(rebalance) time out... Consumer (failed)
Detecting changes to topic partitions. The coordinator keeps a watch on all topic partitions registered in a cluster, that are being consumed by at least one consumer group. When a new partition is added (possibly due to a new added broker) or an old partition is deleted (possibly due to a broker failure), it will trigger the rebalance procedure for every group that is consuming this partition.
Initiate rebalance operation and communicate new partition ownership to consumers. When a coordinator initiates a rebalance operation for a consumer group, it will first send the stop-fetcher request to each consumer in the group and wait for all of them to reply with the last partition consumed offsets. Upon receiving the reply, the consumer should have stopped its fetchers. Then it will send a start-fetcher request to each consumer in the group with the newly computed partition assignment along with the starting offset. The coordinator will finish the rebalance by waiting for all the consumers to finish restarting the fetchers and respond. If any reply is not received after the timeout value, the coordinator will retry the rebalance operation. If the rebalance cannot finish within a number of rebalance retries, the coordinator will log that as a FATAL error and stop rebalancing that consumer group.
Coordinator -- (stop-fetcher) --> Consumer (alive)
- (stop-fetcher) -> Consumer (alive)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coordinator (record offset) <-- (reply) -- Consumer (alive)
(record offset) <-- (reply) -- Consumer (alive)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coordinator (compute new assignment) -- (start-fetcher) --> Consumer (alive)
- (start-fetcher) -> Consumer (become failed)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coordinator <-- (reply) -- Consumer (alive)
(retry rebalance) time out... Consumer (failed)
When a coordinator dies, other peer brokers will notice that and try to re-elect a new coordinator. The new coordinator will not try to connect to the consumers but wait for the consumers to realize the previous coordinator is dead and try to connect to the new one.
The consumer, upon startup, will query the brokers in the cluster for the current coordinator. The broker list is specified in the consumer properties file. Then the consumer will try to establish a socket channel to the coordinator and register itself through the socket channel; once accepted, it will keep trying to read new requests from the coordinator and respond, but never pro-actively send requests to the coordinator. When the consumer does not receive any request within a configurable amount of time, it will treat it as the connection has lost, and stop its fetchers and try to reconnect to the possibly new coordinator by restarting the consulting process again. Its workflow logic can be found here. The main motivation behind having the consumer not send heartbeats to the co-ordinator is to keep the consumer design simple. Implementing blocking socket channels is significantly simpler than implementing a full-fledged socket server using non-blocking socket channels. This goes back to making it easier to rewrite the consumer in other languages.
...
operation.
Consumer
- On startup or on co-ordinator failover, the consumer sends a ClusterMetadataRequest to any of the brokers in the "bootstrap.brokers" list. In the ClusterMetadataResponse, it receives the location of the co-ordinator for it's group.
- The consumer sends a RegisterConsumer request to it's co-ordinator broker. In the RegisterConsumerResponse, it receives the list of topic partitions that it should own.
- At this time, group management is done and the consumer starts fetching data and (optionally) committing offsets for the list of partitions it owns.
Co-ordinator
- Upon election or startup, the co-ordinator reads the list of groups it manages and their membership information from zookeeper. If there is no previous group membership information, it does nothing until the first consumer in some group registers with it.
- Upon election, if the co-ordinator finds previous group membership information in zookeeper, it waits for the consumers in each of the groups to re-register with it. Once all known and alive consumers register with the co-ordinator, it marks the rebalance completed.
- Upon election or startup, the co-ordinator also starts failure detection for all consumers in a group. Consumers that are marked as dead by the co-ordinator's failure detection protocol are removed from the group and the co-ordinator marks the rebalance for a group completed by communicating the new partition ownership to the remaining consumers in the group.
- In steady state, the co-ordinator tracks the health of each consumer in every group through it's failure detection protocol.
- If the co-ordinator marks a consumer as dead, it triggers a rebalance operation for the remaining consumers in the group. Rebalance is triggered by killing the socket connection to the remaining consumers in the group. Consumers notice the broken socket connection and trigger a co-ordinator discovery process (#1, #2 above). Once all alive consumers re-register with the co-ordinator, it communicates the new partition ownership to each of the consumers in the RegisterConsumerResponse, thereby completing the rebalance operation.
- The co-ordinator tracks the changes to topic partition changes for all topics that any consumer group has registered interest for. If it detects a new partition for any topic, it triggers a rebalance operation (as described in #5 above). It is currently not possible to reduce the number of partitions for a topic. The creation of new topics can also trigger a rebalance operation as consumers can register for topics before they are created.
3. Failure detection protocol
4. Configuration
Config Options to Brokers/Consumers
...
Most of the original ZK paths storage are kept, in addition to the coordinator path (stores the current coordinator info):
Code Block |
---|
/consumers/coordinator --> broker_id (ephemeral; created by coordinator)
|
Besides, some of the original ZK paths are removed, including:
Code Block |
---|
/consumers/groups/ids
|
And some of the ephemeral ZK paths are changed to persistent:
Code Block |
---|
/consumers/groups/owners
|
...
5. On Coordinator Startup
Every server will create a coordinator object as its member upon startup. The consumer coordinator keeps the following fields (all the request formats and their usage will be introduced later in this page):
...
Whenever it elects to become the leader, it will trigger the startup procedure of the coordinator described below:
Code Block |
---|
coordinatorStartup :
1. Register session expiration listener
2. Read all the topics from ZK and initialize the subscribed groups for each topic.
3. Register listeners for topics and their partition changes
3.1 Subscribe TopicChangeListener to /brokers/topics
3.2 Subscribe TopicPartitionChangeListener to each /brokers/topics/[topic]
4. Start up the committer and the scheduler
5. Initialize the threadpool of rebalancing handlers
|
The scheduler for ping requests is a delayed scheduler, using a priority queue of timestamps to keep track of the outstanding list of PingRequest, whenever it sends a request it needs to initialize an expire watcher in the PingRequestPurgatory for the request.
Code Block |
---|
scheduler.run :
While isRunning
1. Peek the head consumer from the priority queue
2. If the consumer.scheduledTime <= current_time() try to send the PingRequest, otherwise sleep for (consumer.scheduledTime - current_time()) and then sends it
2.1 Sends the PingRequest via the SocketServer of the broker (the corresponding processor Id and selection key is remembered in the consumer registry)
2.2 Set the timeout watcher in PingRequestPurgatory for the consumer
3. Remove the consumer from the head of the queue and put the consumer with consumer.scheduledTime += (consumer.session_timeout_ms * 1/3) back to the queue
|
...
The timeout watcher mechanism will be implemented using the Purgatory component. For a detailed description of the request expire/satisfy purgatory, please read here.
...
6. On Topic Partition Changes Detection
When the ZK wachers are fired notifying topic partition changes, the coordinator needs to decide which consumer groups are affected by this change and hence need rebalancing.
Handle Topic Change
Code Block |
---|
TopicChangeListener.handleChildChange :
1. Get the newly added topic (since /brokers/topics are persistent nodes, no topics should be deleted even if there is no consumers any more inside the group)
2. For each newly added topic:
2.1 Subscribe TopicPartitionChangeListener to /brokers/topics/topic
2.2 For groups that have wildcard interests, check whether any group is interested in the newly added topics; if yes, add the group to the interested group list of this topic
2.3 Get the set of groups that are interested in this topic, and if the group's rebalance bit is not set, set it and try to rebalance the group by assigning a rebalance task to some rebalance handler's queue randomly.
* To avoid concurrent rebalancing of the same group by two different handler threads, we need to enforce assigning the task to the same handler's queue if it is already assigned to that handler. Details will be described in the implementation section.
|
Handle Topic Partition Change
Code Block |
---|
TopicPartitionChangeListener.handleChildChange :
1. Get the set of groups that are interested in this topic, and if the group's rebalance bit is not set, set it and try to rebalance the group
|
...
7. On Consumer Startup
Upon creation, the consumer will get a list of
Code Block |
---|
{brokerId : (host, port)}
|
...
After that, the consumer will try to keep reading new requests from the coordinator. Hence the consumer does not need to embed a socket server.
Code Block |
---|
consumerStartup (initBrokers : Map[Int, (String, String)]):
1. In a round robin fashion, pick a broker in the initialized cluster metadata, create a socket channel with that broker
1.1. If the socket channel cannot be established, it will log an error and try the next broker in the initBroker list
1.2. The consumer will keep retrying connection to the brokers in a round robin fashioned it is shut down.
2. Send a ClusterMetadataRequest request to the broker and get a ClusterMetadataResponse from the broker
3. From the response update its local memory of the current server cluster metadata and the id of the current coordinator
4. Set up a socket channel with the current coordinator, send a RegisterConsumerRequest and receive a RegisterConsumerResponse
5. If the RegisterConsumerResponse indicates the consumer registration is successful, it will try to keep reading rebalancing requests from the channel; otherwise go back to step 1
|
...
Note that in this design we are still considering the format of 0.7, although new wire format has already been used in 0.8. Our implementation will keeps this in mind and make it easy to adapt to new format.
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this request, not including the first 4 bytes for this field
request_type_id: int16 // the request type id, distinguish Fetch/Produce/Offset/Consult/etc requests
// do not need any data for the cluster metadata request
}
|
ClusterMetadataResponse
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this response, not including the first 4 bytes for this field
error_code: int16 // global error code for this request, if any
coordinator_id: int32 // broker id of the coordinator
num_brokers: int16 // number of brokers in the following list
brokers_info: [<broker_struct>] // current broker list in the cluster
}
broker_struct =>
{
id: int32
host: string // we adapt the protocol of 0.8 for strings, where the size of the string is stored at the beginning, followed by the bytes
port: int32
}
|
RegisterConsumerRequest
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this request
request_type_id: int16 // the type of the request, currently only one type is allowed: ConnectConsumerRequest
group_id: string // group that the consumer belongs to
consumer_id: string // consumer id
topic_count: string // interested topic and number of streams, can be wildcard
auto_commit: boolean // indicator of whether autocommit is enabled
auto_offset_rest: string // indicator of what to do if an offset is out of range, currently either smallest or largest
session_timeout_ms: int32 // session timeout in milliseconds
}
|
...
If all the checks are successful, then the co-ordinator accepts the registration and sends a RegisterConsumerReponse with no error message; otherwise it includes an appropriate error code in the RegisterConsumerReponse. It does not close the connection but let the consumer who receives the error code to close the connection.
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this response
error_code: int16 // global error code for this request, if any
// no data needed
}
|
...
Handle New Group
Code Block |
---|
handleNewGroup :
1. Create a new group registry with zero consumer members in coordinator
|
...
Handle New Consumer
Code Block |
---|
handleAddedConsumer :
1. Add the ping request task for this consumer to the scheduler.
2. Add the consumer registry to the group registry's member consumer registry list.
3. Read the subscribed topic/count of this consumer.
3.1 If it is a wildcard topic/count subscription, then add its group to the list of groups with wildcard topic subscriptions.
3.2 For each topic that it subscribed to, add its group to the list of groups that has subscribed to the topic.
4. Try to rebalance the group
|
...
8. On Consumer Failure Detection
Upon successfully registering a consumer, the coordinator will add the consumer's PingRequest to the ping request scheduler's queue, which will then try to keep track if the consumer is still alive or not.
...
Handle Consumer Failure
Code Block |
---|
handleConsumerFailure :
1. Remove its ping request task from the scheduler.
2. Close its corresponding socket from the broker's SocketServer.
3. Remove its registry from its group's member consumer registry list.
4. If there is an ongoing rebalance procedure by some of the rebalance handlers, let it fail directly.
5. If the group still has some member consumers, try to rebalance the group.
|
...
9. On Rebalancing
The rebalancing threads keep block-reading from their corresponding rebalance request queue. Hence each handles the rebalancing tasks for a non-overlapping subset of groups (e.g. through hashing functions).
For each rebalance request for a specific group it triggers the following rebalance logic:
Code Block |
---|
rebalance (group) :
1. Get the topics that are interested by the group. For each topic:
1.1. Get the number of partitions by reading from ZK
1.2. Get the number of threads for each topic from the meta information of consumers in the group it kept in memory
1.3. Compute the new ownership assignment for the topic
3. Check if a rebalance is necessary by trying to get the current ownership from ZK for each topic.
3.1 If there is no registered ownership info in ZK, rebalance is necessary
3.2 If some partitions are not owned by any threads, rebalance is necessary
3.3 If some partitions registered in the ownership map do not exist any longer, rebalance is necessary
3.4 If ownership map do not match with the newly computed one, rebalance is necessary
3.5 Otherwise rebalance is not necessary
4. If rebalance is necessary, do the following:
4.1 For each consumer in the group, send the StopFetcherRequest to the socket server's corresponding processor
4.2 Then wait until socket server has reported that all the StopFetcherReponse have been received or a timeout has expired
4.3 Enforce committing the current consumed offsets information to Zookeeper
4.4 For each consumer in the group, send the StartFetcherRequest to the socket server's corresponding processor
4.5 Then wait until socket server has reported that all the StartFetcherReponse have been received or a timeout has expired
4.6 Update the new assignment of partitions to consumers in the Zookeeper
5. If a timeout signal is received in either 4.2 or 4.5 from the socket server, wait for config.rebalanceBackoffMs and retry rebalancing again.
|
If the handler cannot finish rebalance successfully with config.maxRebalanceRetries retries, it will throw a ConsumerRebalanceFailedException to the log.
...
10. On Coordinator Failover
Whenever the current coordinator's hosted server dies, other coordinator's elector will realize that through the ZK listener and will try to re-elect to be the leader, and whoever wins will trigger the coordinator startup procedure.
When the dead server comes back, it's elector will atomically reconnect to ZK and trigger the handleNewSession function:
Code Block |
---|
handleNewSession :
1. Reset its state by clearing its in memory metadata.
2. Re-register the session expiration listener (this is because ZkClient does not re-register itself once fired).
3. Try to re-elect to be the coordinator by directly calling the elect function of its coordinatorElector.
|
As for consumers, if a consumer has not heard any request (either Ping or Stop/StartFetcher) from the coordinator for session_timeout, it will suspects that the coordinator is dead. Then it will stops its fetcher, close the connection and re-execute the startup procedure, trying to re-discover the new coordinator.
...
11. On Consumer Handling Coordinator Request
There are three types of requests that a consumer can receive from the coordinator: PingRequest, StopFetcherRequest and StartFetcherRequest. For each type of request, the consumer is expected to respond within 2/3 * session_timeout.
...
Coordinator uses PingRequest to check if the consumer is still alive, and consumer need to respond with the current offset for each consuming partition if auto_commit is set.
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this request
request_type_id: int16 // the type of the request, distinguish Ping/Stop/StartFetcher requests
consumer_id: string // id string of the consumer
num_retries: int32 // indicate this is the #th ping retry
}
|
PingResponse
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this response
request_type_id: int16 // the type of the request, distinguish Ping/Stop/StartFetcher requests
error_code: int16 // global error code for this request, if any
consumer_id: string // id string of the consumer, this is only used by the purgatory
num_partition: int16 // number of partitions that the consumer is consuming
offset_info: [<offset_struct>] // the offset info for each partition consumed by this consumer, its size should be exactly num_partition
// if auto_commit is set to false the last two fields should not exist
}
offset_struct =>
{
topic: string
partition: string
offset: int64
}
|
Handling PingRequest
Code Block |
---|
handlePingRequest (request: PingRequest):
1. If shutdown is initiated:
1.1 If autoCommit is not turned on, can shut down immediately after responding this PingRequest
1.2 Otherwise, need to wait for the next PingRequest to arrive after responding this PingRequest to make sure the previous PingResponse with the offset info has been received by the coordinator.
2. If the fetchers of the consumer has stopped unexpectedly due to out-of-range error, close the current connection with the coordinator, stop fetchers, and try to reconnect to the coordinator in order to trigger rebalance.
3.1 If autoCommit is not enabled, just sends a PingResponse with no num_partition and offset_info
3.2 Otherwise read topicRegistry and sends a PingResponse with the created num_partitions and offset_info
|
Handling PingResponse
Code Block |
---|
handlePingResponse (response: PingResponse):
1. Get the offset information for each consumed partition, and record the offset information to the group's registry if possible.
2. Clear the corresponding expiration watcher in PingRequestPurgatory.
|
...
When the coordinator decides to rebalance a group, it will send StopFetcherRequest to every consumer in the group to let them stop their fetchers.
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this request
request_type_id: int16 // the type of the request, distinguish Ping/Stop/StartFetcher requests
consumer_id: string // id string of the consumer, this is only used by the purgatory
}
|
Handling StopFetcherRequest
Code Block |
---|
StopFetcherRequest (request: StopFetcherRequest):
1. Close all fetchers and clean their corresponding queues
2. Send the response, if autoCommit is turned on attached the current consumed offsets to the response also.
3. Clear the corresponding expiration watcher in StopFetcherRequestPurgatory, and if all the watchers have been cleared notify the rebalance handler.
|
StopFetcherResponse
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this response
request_type_id: int16 // the type of the request, distinguish Ping/Stop/StartFetcher requests
error_code: int16 // global error code for this request, if any
consumer_id: string // id string of the consumer, this is only used by the purgatory
num_partition: int16 // number of partitions that the consumer is consuming
offset_info: [<offset_struct>] // the offset info for each partition consumed by this consumer, its size should be exactly num_partition
// if auto_commit is set to false the last two fields should not exist
}
|
...
When the coordinator have received the StopFetcherResponse from all the consumers, it will send the StartFetcherRequest to the consumers along with the starting offset for each partition got from the StopFetcherResponses. Note that the StartFetcherRequest also contains the current cluster metadata, which is used to update the consumer's server cluster metadata in order to avoid unnecessary rebalancing attempts.
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this request
request_type_id: int16 // the type of the request, distinguish Ping/Start/StartFetcher requests
consumer_id: string // id string of the consumer
num_threads: int16 // the number of threads that have assigned partitions
ownership_info: [<ownership_struct>] // the detailed info of the ownership
num_brokers: int16 // number of brokers in the following list
brokers_info: [<broker_struct>] // current broker list in the cluster}
ownership_struct =>
{
consumer_thread_id: string // consumer thread id
num_partitions: int16 // the number of partitions assigned to the consumer
assigned_parts: [<partition_struct>] // the detailed info of assigned partitions, along with the starting offset
}
partition_struct =>
{
topic: string
partition: string // note that this partition string already contains the broker id
offset: int64
}
|
Handling StartFetcherRequest
Code Block |
---|
handleStartFetcherRequest (request: StartFetcherRequest):
1. If the consumer's topic interests are wildcard, re-construct topicThreadIdAndQueues and KafkaMessageAndMetadataStreams
2. Read the assigned partitions along with offsets from assigned_parts
3. Update topic registry with the newly assigned partition map
4. Start fetchers with the new topic registry
5. Send back the StartFetcherResponse
|
StartFetcherResponse
Code Block |
---|
{
size: int32 // the size of this response
request_type_id: int16 // the type of the request, distinguish Ping/Stop/StartFetcher requests
error_code: int16 // global error code for this request, if any
consumer_id: string // id string of the consumer, this is only used by the purgatory
}
|
Handling StartFetcherResponse
Code Block |
---|
handleStartRequest (response: StartFetcherResponse):
1. Clear the corresponding expiration watcher in StartFetcherRequestPurgatory, and if all the watchers have been cleared notify the rebalance handler.
|
...
12. Implementation
...
12.1 kafka.api
The following classes are used to describe the request/registry format described in Section 6 and Section 10:
...
- All the above requests' request ids are added to RequestKeys.scala
...
12.2 kafka.cluster
Broker and Cluster add writeTo(buffer) and sizeInBytes functions to be used in ClusterInfoSend.
...
12.3 kafka.common
Add some more error code to ErrorMapping.
...
12.4 kafka.network
- SocketServer: hacked to be able to recognize coordinator-specific requests, which would need coordinator's metadata to handle; also hacked to be able to pro-actively send messages by assuming no partial read/write is under going (which is valid for the coordinator's usage). In the future this hacking needs to be removed when we redesign SocketServer after 0.8 for interleaving reads/writes.
- NonBlockingChannel:
...
12.5 kafka.utils
ZkElection: election module based on Zookeeper.
Also some utility functions are added to Utils and ZkUtils.
...
12.6 kafka.consumer
- OffsetInfoSend: offset information format wrapper, match with for HeartbeatResponse and StopFetcherResponse.
...
- CoordinatorRequestHandler: it contains the handler function to handle different types of requests from the coordinator by the ConsumerCoordinatorConnector. Its logic is described in Section 10.
...
12.7 kafka.server
- KafkaServer contains a new ConsumerCoordinator instance, which will be initialized upon server startup if ZookeeperEnabled is true.
- ConsumerCoordinator contains the following members and metadata structures (just following Section 4):
- A ZKClient that is different from the one that KafkaServer used.
- ZkElection: a Zookeeper based election module, which will trigger the startup call back procedure of the ConsumerCoordinator upon success election. Hence at the same time period only one ConsumerCoordinator of the servers will be "active".
Array\[RebalanceRequestHandler\]: a list of rebalance handler threads which is used for processing the rebalancing tasks for groups, each has a BlockingQueue\[String\] storing assigned rebalance tasks.Wiki Markup - A KafkaScheduler heartbeat request scheduling thread which periodically sends heartbeat request to all consumers (frequency based on consumer's session timeout value) that is registered to this coordinator.
- A KafkaScheduler offset committing thread which periodically writes the current consumed offset for each group to Zookeeper using the coordinator's ZKClient.
- A HeartbeatRequestPurgatory storing expiration watchers for sent HeartbeatRequest (in implementation we rename "ping" to "heartbeat")
- A StopFetcherRequestPurgatory and a StartFetcherRequestPurgatory storing expiration watchers for Stop/StartFetcherRequestPurgatory.
- consumerGroupsPerTopic: a list of groups which have subscribed to each topic.
- groupsWithWildcardTopics: a list of groups which have at least one consumer that have wildcard topic subscription.
- groupRegistries: a list of group registries, each contains the group metadata for rebalancing usage and its member consumers' registered metadata.
and the main API functions include:
- startup: the startup logic described in Section 4.
- shutdown: called by the KafkaServer upon shutting down, will first close the elector, shutdown the heartbeat request scheduler, offset committer and rebalance handlers.
- addRebalanceRequest: assign one rebalance task for a specific group to one of the rebalance handler's queue.
- If the group has been assigned to a rebalance handler and have not been finished rebalancing (i.e, currRebalancer != None), enforce assign this task also to this handler to avoid concurrent rebalancing of the same group.
- Otherwise choose the rebalance handler in a round-robin fashion for load balance.
- sendHeartbeatToConsumer: called by the heartbeat request scheduler, used to send the HeartbeatRequest to the consumer if 1) the previous request has been responded and 2) the consumer still exist in the group's registry
- handleHeartbeatRequestExpired: increment the number of failed response in the consumer's registry, and if it has exceeded the maximum allowed failures, mark the consumer as failed and trigger handleConsumerFailure
- handleNewGroup: logic described in Section 6
- handleNewGroupMember: logic of handle new consumer described in Section 6
- handleConsumerFailure: logic described in Section 7
- A list of utility functions used to access the group registry data outside ConsumerCoordinator, which is synchronized to avoid read/write conflicts.
- RebalanceRequestHandler: logic of the rebalance handler thread:
- run: while not shutting down, keep trying to get the next rebalance task from its queue, clear the group's rebalanceInitiated bit and process the rebalance logic (described in Section 8).
- Before each rebalance attempt, first reset the rebalanceFailed bit in the group's registry, which could be set by other thread during the rebalance procedure.
- Before each rebalance attempt, read the current group's consumer registry list snapshot, which will not change during the rebalance procedure even if its underlying registry data has changed.
- Upon successfully complete the rebalance, reset the currRebalancer to None, indicating that no one is now assigned to this group for rebalancing.
- sendStopFetcherRequest: if the consumer's channel has closed while trying to send the request, immediately mark this attempt as failed.
- sendStartFetcherRequest: read the offset from Zookeeper before constructing the request, and if the consumer's channel has closed while trying to send the request, immediately mark this attempt as failed.
- isRebalanceNecessary: compare the new assignment with the current assignment written in Zookeeper to decide if rebalancing is necessary.
- waitForAllResponses: waiting for all Stop/StartFetcherResponse to received or timeout.
- run: while not shutting down, keep trying to get the next rebalance task from its queue, clear the group's rebalanceInitiated bit and process the rebalance logic (described in Section 8).
- KafkaRequestHandlers: add handle functions for coordinator-specific responses (i.e. HeartbeatResponse, StopFetcherResponse, StartFetcherResponse), need a different function signature since it requires knowledge of the coordinator.e. HeartbeatResponse, StopFetcherResponse, StartFetcherResponse), need a different function signature since it requires knowledge of the coordinator. In 0.8 with api/handlers this needs to refactoring.
- HeartbeatRequestPurgatory: inherted from RequestPurgatory, on expire call the handleHeartbeatRequestExpired function of ConsumerCoordinator.
- StartFetcherRequestPurgatory: inherted from RequestPurgatory, on expire call the handleStopOrStartFetcherRequestExpired function of ConsumerCoordinator.
- StopFetcherRequestPurgatory: inherted from RequestPurgatory, on expire call the handleStopOrStartFetcherRequestExpired function of ConsumerCoordinator. In 0.8 with api/handlers this needs to refactoring.
- HeartbeatRequestPurgatory: inherted from RequestPurgatory, on expire call the handleHeartbeatRequestExpired function of ConsumerCoordinator.
- StartFetcherRequestPurgatory: inherted from RequestPurgatory, on expire call the handleStopOrStartFetcherRequestExpired function of ConsumerCoordinator.
- StopFetcherRequestPurgatory: inherted from RequestPurgatory, on expire call the handleStopOrStartFetcherRequestExpired function of ConsumerCoordinator. In 0.8 branch with RequestOrReponse class these two can be combined into one.
12. Open Issues / Future work
Implementation
...
- branch with RequestOrReponse class these two can be combined into one.
13. Open Issues / Future work
Implementation
- Active CommitOffset on Consumers: Currently consumers can no longer actively call commitOffset() to commit their current consumed offsets to Zookeeper, but can only wait for HeartbeatRequests to respond with their offsets. In order to support this the consumers must be not only able to read requests from the coordinator channel but also write requests to the channel. In addition, the SocketServer that the coordinator depends on for RPC communication must also be able to concurrently read to and write from channels.
- Conflict of HeartbeatRequest with Stop/StartFetcherResponse: When the heartbeat scheduler of the coordinator tries to send the HeartbeatRequest to consumers, it is possible that the channel for the consumer has some partial read Stop/StartFetcherResponse, since the current SocketServer can only read or write alone at the same time, the scheduler can only drop this request and wait for the next time. On the consumer's side, it would probably suspect the coordinator has failed and re-connect to the new one, causing unnecessary rebalancing attempts. The solution of the previous issue should be able to solve this also: enabling SocketServer to be able to concurrently read to and write from channels.
- Conflict of HeartbeatRequest with Stop/StartFetcherResponse: When the heartbeat scheduler of the coordinator tries to send the HeartbeatRequest to consumers, it is possible that the channel for the consumer has some partial read Stop/StartFetcherResponse, since the current SocketServer can only read or write alone at the same time, the scheduler can only drop this request and wait for the next time. On the consumer's side, it would probably suspect the coordinator has failed and re-connect to the new one, causing unnecessary rebalancing attempts. The solution of the previous issue should be able to solve this also: enabling SocketServer to be able to concurrently read to and write from channels.
- Incorporating with 0.8 branch: There are still several implementation details that are based on 0.7, which needs to be incorporated with 0.8 after 0.8 is stable (these are marked as TODOs in the code):
- Combine Request and Response into RequestOrResponse: this can allow StartFetcherPurgatory and StopFetcherPurgatory to be combined also.
- Request format protocol: in 0.8 we need to
...
- Incorporating with 0.8 branch: There are still several implementation details that are based on 0.7, which needs to be incorporated with 0.8 after 0.8 is stable (these are marked as TODOs in the code):
- Combine Request and Response into RequestOrResponse: this can allow StartFetcherPurgatory and StopFetcherPurgatory to be combined also.
- Request format protocol: in 0.8 we need to add some more fields such as versionId, correlationId and ClientId to the requests.
- Refactor RequestHandlers: in 0.8 the RequestHandlers are in kafka.api with SocketServer enhanced with request and response queues. Currently we hacked the RequestHandlers to treat coordinator request/response as special cases against other request types such as fetcher/produce/offset, and also hacked SocketServer to be aware of these coordinator-related special case requests; after 0.8 we should go back to the principal that SocketServer is ignorant of Kafka. More detailed discussions can be found here.
- Virtual Failure in Unit Test: in order to test the failure detection functionality of the coordinator/consumer, we also need to simulate scenarios when the coordinator/consumer is virtually failed (e.g. undergoing a long GC or blocked by IO). Currently it is hacked in the Coordinator code to simulate such cases, but we definitely needs some methods to not touch the implementation but enable them in some testing frameworks.
- Deleting Group Registries from Coordinator: currently the group registry entry will never be removed from the coordinator even if the group has no member consumers any more. With ConsoleConsumer implementation which creates a random-named group to register, it may cause a lot of "empty" group registry entries in some long running coordinator. We need to think about the semantics of "when" and "how" we can delete a consumer group in the coordinator.
Design
- Dependency on Initial Broker List: When all the brokers listed in the properties file as known brokers are gone when a consumer starts/resumes, the consumer cannot find the coordinator and thus cannot be added to the group to start consuming. This case should be treated as an operational error since the migration of broker cluster should be incremental and adapt to consumer properties file.
- Latency Spike during Coordinator Failover: Since consumers no longer register themselves in Zookeeper, when a new coordinator stands up, it needs to wait for all the consumer to re-connect to it, causing a lot of channel connectioned and rebalancing requests to the rebalance handlers. Hence the consumers will not start their fetchers after be connected to the coordinator until it receives the StartFetcherRequest, some groups's consumers might wait longer time than usually to start consuming.
- Multiple Coordinator: In the future, it might be possible that we need each broker to act as a coordinator, with consumer groups evenly distributed amongst all the consumer coordinators. This will enable supporting >5K consumers since right now the number of open socket connections a single machine can handle limits the scale of the consumers.
- Rebalance Retrial Semantics needs Rethinking: currently the rebalance retrial semantics still follows the original design: whenever the current attempt has failed, sleep for some backoff time and retry again; when the maximum number of retries as reached, throw an exception. With the coordinator based rebalancing mechanism, it is not clear if the maximum rebalance retry still make sense any more: probably the rebalance handler should keep retrying until the rebalance has succeeded, and also the backoff time should be dependent to the consumers' session timeout value.