Table of Contents |
---|
Status
Current state: "Under Discussion" Accepted
Discussion thread: here
JIRA:
Jira | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Released: 1.0.0
Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).
...
The other, and perhaps more compelling, incentive for this change is that the current ACL settings breaks a certain functionality (and this functionality seems to have been broken for a while). As mentioned in the above table the minimum required permission for DescribeGroup
and OffsetFetch
is Describe and Read, respectively. But implementation of the describe group command line makes use of OffsetFetch
API (version 0 and 1 pre-KIP-88, and version 2 post-KIP-88). Therefore, a user who is granted the current minimum requirement permission Describe for DescribeGroup
still would not be able to run the describe group command and get the expected result. They would see something like this in the output:
...
If we make the change suggested belowin the next section, the command runs successfully and reports the group offsets.
The following potential unit tests in scala.integration.kafka.api.AuthorizerIntegrationTest
could further clarify the problem.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
// this test is to clarify that the issue exists for the consumer group command line only, and not the API
@Test
def testDescribeGroupApiWithGroupDescribe() {
addAndVerifyAcls(Set(new Acl(KafkaPrincipal.ANONYMOUS, Allow, Acl.WildCardHost, Describe)), groupResource)
addAndVerifyAcls(Set(new Acl(KafkaPrincipal.ANONYMOUS, Allow, Acl.WildCardHost, Describe)), topicResource)
AdminClient.createSimplePlaintext(brokerList).describeConsumerGroup(group)
}
// this test highlights the issue with command line, where the supposedly sufficient 'Describe' access is not enough to run the command
@Test(expected = classOf[GroupAuthorizationException])
def testDescribeGroupCliWithGroupDescribe() {
addAndVerifyAcls(Set(new Acl(KafkaPrincipal.ANONYMOUS, Allow, Acl.WildCardHost, Describe)), groupResource)
addAndVerifyAcls(Set(new Acl(KafkaPrincipal.ANONYMOUS, Allow, Acl.WildCardHost, Describe)), topicResource)
val cgcArgs = Array("--bootstrap-server", brokerList, "--describe", "--group", group)
val opts = new ConsumerGroupCommandOptions(cgcArgs)
val consumerGroupService = new KafkaConsumerGroupService(opts)
consumerGroupService.describeGroup()
}
// this test confirms that a minimum of 'Read' access is required to successfully run the command
@Test
def testDescribeGroupCliWithGroupRead() {
addAndVerifyAcls(Set(new Acl(KafkaPrincipal.ANONYMOUS, Allow, Acl.WildCardHost, Read)), groupResource)
addAndVerifyAcls(Set(new Acl(KafkaPrincipal.ANONYMOUS, Allow, Acl.WildCardHost, Describe)), topicResource)
val cgcArgs = Array("--bootstrap-server", brokerList, "--describe", "--group", group)
val opts = new ConsumerGroupCommandOptions(cgcArgs)
val consumerGroupService = new KafkaConsumerGroupService(opts)
consumerGroupService.describeGroup()
} |
Proposed Changes
The change proposed by this KIP is very simple: to lower the minimum required permission of the OffsetFetch
API from Read to Describe. These minimum required permissions are hard-coded in kafka.server.KafkaApis.scala
inside each API handler method. For example, the part that enforces the minimum required permission for the OffsetFetch
API currently looks like this:
...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
if (!authorize(request.session, Describe, new Resource(Group, offsetFetchRequest.groupId))) offsetFetchRequest.getErrorResponse(requestThrottleMs, Errors.GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED) |
Additional Food for Thought
As I was experimenting with the ACLs for this KIP I made some observations that made me wonder about the rationale behind their current ACL settings; and whether they need adjustments too:
Heartbeat
does not seem to be a mutating action (no changes to the group or consumer seem to made when a heartbeat request is processed). If that is the case, should we also lower the minimum required permission ofHeartbeat
to Describe?- Users can see all groups in the cluster (using consumer group’s
--list
option) if they have Describe access to the cluster. Would it make sense to modify that experience and limit what is listed in the output to only those groups they have Describe access to? The reason is, almost anything else is accessible by a user only if the access is specifically granted (through ACL--add
); and this scenario should not be an exception. The potential change would be updating the minimum required permission ofListGroup
from Describe (Cluster) to Describe (Group).
Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan
- A user that already has Read permission to a consumer group, with this change, would still be able to query the group like before (Read implies Describe). For this user the change is backward compatible.
- Consider a user with Describe access. The group Describe access implies access to
DescribeGroup
andFindCoordinator
APIs; even though this user cannot make use ofDescribeGroup
, as explained above. Giving this user access toOffsetFetch
API means fixing that broken experience.
In general, As a result of this change, Kafka admins may need to revisit the relevant ACLs and update them if necessary.
Rejected Alternatives