Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3

...

  • The dependent table does not have a location.
    • The list of partitions are computed at query time - think of it like a view, where each partition has its own definition limited to 'select * from T where partial/full partition spec'. Query layer needs to change. Is it possible ? Unlike a view, it does not rewritten at semantic analysis time. After partition pruning is done (on a dependent table), rewrite the
      tree to contain the base table T - the columns remain the same, so it should be possible.

With this, it is possible that the partitions point to different tables.
For eg:

alter table Tdependent add partition (ds='1') depends on table T1 partition (ds='1');
alter table Tdependent add partition (ds='2') depends on table T2 partition (ds='2');

Something that can be achieved by external tables currently. The dependent partitions are computed dynamically - T1@ds=1/hr=1 does not know the fact that it is dependent upon by Tdependent@ds=1.
T1@ds=1/hr=1 can be dropped anytime, and Tdependent@ds=1 automatically stops depending upon it from that point.

I am leaning towards this - the user need not specify both the location and the dependent partitions.
Can the external tables be enhanced to support this ? Will create a problem for the query layer, since the external tables are handled differently today.

    • The list of dependent partitions are materialized and stored in the metastore, and use that for querying.
      A query like 'select .. from Tdependent where ds = 1' gets transformed to 'select .. from (select * from T where ((ds = 1 and hr = 1) or (ds = 1 and hr = 2) .... or (ds=1 and hr=24))'
      Can put a lot of load on the query layer.

= Final Proposal =
Instead of enhancing external tables to solve a convoluted usecase, create a new type of tables - dependent tables. The reason for the existence of external tables is to point to some existing data.

== Dependent Tables ==
Create a table which explicitly depends on another table. Consider the following scenario for the first use case mentioned:

Code Block

create table T (key string, value string) partitioned by (ds string, hr string);

-- create a dependent table which specifies the dependencies explicitly
-- Tdep inherits the schema of T
-- Tdep is partitioned by a prefix of T (either ds or ds,hr)
create dependent table Tdep partitioned by (ds string) depends on table T;

In order to denote the end of a daily partition for T, the corresponding partition is added in Tdep

Code Block

-- create partition T@ds=1/hr=1 to T@ds=1/hr=24
alter table Tdep add partition (ds=1);

The metastore stores the following dependencies

  • Tdep depends on T, and T is dependent upon by Tdep
  • Tdep@ds=1 depends on T@ds=1

In some usecases, it is possible that some partitions of Tdep depends on T, whereas the newer partitions of Tdep depend on T2.

Code Block

create table T (key string, value string) partitioned by (ds string, hr string);

-- create a dependent table which specifies the dependencies explicitly
-- Tdep inherits the schema of T
-- Tdep is partitioned by a prefix of T (either ds or ds,hr)
create dependent table Tdep partitioned by (ds string) depends on table T;

-- create partition T@ds=1/hr=1 to T@ds=1/hr=24
alter table Tdep add partition (ds=1);

-- repeat this for T@ds=1 to T@ds=10

-- T is being deprecated, and T2 is the new table (with the same schema, possibly partitioned on different keys)

create table T2 (key string, value string) partitioned by (ds string, hr string, min string);

alter table Tdep depends on table T2;

-- create partition T2@ds=11/hr=1/min=1 to T2@ds=11/hr=24/min=60
alter table Tdep add partition (ds=1);

The metastore stores the following dependencies

  • Tdep depends on (T,T2), and (T,T2) are dependent upon by Tdep
  • T and T2 have the same schema
  • Tdep@ds=1..Tdep@ds=10 depends on T@ds=1..T@ds=10 respectively
  • Tdep@ds=11 depends on T2@ds=11

The query on Tdep is re-written to access the underlying tables. For eg. for the query 'select count(1) from Tdep where ds = 1', once partition pruning is done (on Tdep), the operator tree (TableScan(Tdep):ds=1 -> Select) is rewritten to (TableScan(T):ds=1/hr=1 to ds=1/hr=24 -> Select). The advantage of this over external tables is that all the table properties (bucketing/sorting/list bucketing) for the underlying tables are used. This can easily extend to multiple tables. For eg. for the query 'select count(1) from Tdep where ds = 1 or ds = 11', once partition pruning is done (on Tdep), the operator tree (TableScan(Tdep):ds=1,ds=11 -> Select) is rewritten to (TableScan(T):ds=1/hr=1 to ds=1/hr=24 -> Select -> Union) and (TableScan(T2):ds=1/hr=1 to ds=1/hr=24 -> Select -> Union).

  • If the schema of T changes, it can either be dis-allowed or propagated to Tdep.
  • desc extended will be enhanced to show all the dependent partitions.
  • The dependency of an existing partition can be changed: alter table Tdep partition (ds=10) depends on table T2