...
One of the questions that popped up on the Turbine mailing list is, why there is no commons-logging.properties file for Turbine.
At this point I started wondering, whether one could use this to actually configure logging for Turbine applications . I looked at the docs and found the docs on how to configure the \[http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/apidocs/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.html LogFactory\] buried three deep in the API docs. Wiki Markup
In Turbine 2.3 we have used
No Format |
---|
// // Set up Commons Logging to use the Log4J Logging // System.getProperties().setProperty(LogFactory.class.getName(), Log4jFactory.class.getName()); |
...
to set up the \[http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/apidocs/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory .html LogFactory \] class which is not exactly the most elegant thing to do.
If you know, where to look, you will find a page in the docs which describes the configuration process in detail. \[http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/apidocs/org/apache/commons/logging/package-summary. html Look here.\] Wiki Markup
Please note, that you must still configure the underlying logging layer. So configuring commons-logging does not give you automatically a fully configured \[http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/ Log4J \] Logger. Wiki Markup
For a small application without many logging needs, I'd recommend to use the commons-logging.properties method. Put a file called commons-logging.properties in your class path with the following contents:
...
This will use the default Factory class implementation and use the integrated simple Logger to send logging output to stderr.
\[http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/apidocs/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/SimpleLog.html SimpleLog\] can even be configured by a properties file called _simplelog.properties_ on your class path. Wiki Markup Wiki Markup
Also see \[http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/apidocs/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.html Log4JLogger\]