Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

...

Attendees:

JV, Enrico, Sijie, Yiming


Minutes:

JV: we have some a leak on on the reader

from Slack:

Wiki Markup

we

ran

into

fullGC

and

zktimeouts

over

a

long

run

and

the

GC

shows

like

this359752

3:

1650087

79204176

java.util.HashMap


359753

4:

718190

74691760

org.apache.bookkeeper.client.PendingReadOp


359754

5:

823944

59323968

java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask


Pointing

to

PendingReadOp


protected

void

cancelSpeculativeTask(boolean

mayInterruptIfRunning)

{


if

(speculativeTask

!=

null)

{


speculativeTask.cancel(mayInterruptIfRunning);


speculativeTask

=

null;


}


}


But

we

never

assign

anything

to

speculativeTask


so

we

never

cancel

them


That

appears

to

be

one

issue

for

sure


do

you

guys

see

any

other

issues?

or

have

run

into

similar

problem?


Yiming reports that at Twitter they saw something similar, but it was due to the bookie which was throttling the clients, which in turn they were queuing up the requests

Sijie: The problem should be around the fact we are not cancelling the  PendingReadOp

JV has a quick fix


Sijie: about the 128bit ledger id. switching to 128bit should not have impact on performances. It will need some engineering work for the implementation.

JV:  Sijie's proposal is fine, but how can we start wokring on this, it is a bug change

Sijie: We can split the work in smaller tasks, it is important to stay always backward compatible.

Enrico: we have to decide a name for 'scope' soon

JV and Sijie: oky for "scope", it sounds like a "workaround", but it is fine, let's start this thing soon.