You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 18 Next »

Based on comments from IPMC on Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta rc2:

...these are the items that need to be fixed for Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta to be released:

 QuoteDetailsRelated Issue
1

"Unexpected binary files in the source release (these contain compiled code)". (JM)

"Remove the binary zip files from the source release." (JA)

./lib.terminalemulator/examples/lib.richexecution/process_start-linux-intel.zip
./lib.terminalemulator/examples/lib.richexecution/process_start-mac-intel.zip
./lib.terminalemulator/examples/lib.richexecution/process_start-solaris-intel.zip
./lib.terminalemulator/examples/lib.richexecution/process_start-solaris-sparc.zip

 Unable to render Jira issues macro, execution error.
2"Every issue raised by JM represented in JIRA somewhere." (JA)That is what this page aims to provide. Unable to render Jira issues macro, execution error.
3"Specific call outs in the README about test data licensing not be Apache

license."

  
4"Specific call outs somewhere that the XSDs, ENTs, etc are derived from

other locations."

  

...and these need to be fixed at some point after Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta but before becoming a top level project:

 QuoteNotesRelated Issue
1"Several (not dual license) GPL license files exist in the source release. Does this software include GPL or depend on any GPL licensed software?"

For instance:
nbbuild/licenses/LGPL-2.1
apisupport.installer/src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/installer/resources/licenses/GPL

 
2"There a large number of icons in the release do know the ip provenance of them and how they are licensed?" (JM)  
3"There also seems to be a number of stock photos in the release. How are they licensed? Do you have permission to use or distribute them?" (JM)

javafx2.samples/DisplayShelf/src/displayshelf/animalX.jpg
javafx2.samples/Fireworks/src/Fireworks/sf.jpg
javafx2.samples/PuzzlePieces/src/puzzlepieces/PuzzlePieces-picture.jpg

 
4"I glanced at the binary LICENSE and NOTICE of the binary and I think there's too much information in there.

- There is no need to repeat the Apache license text several times
- Only 3rd party software that is bundled in the source release needs to be mention in LICENSE and NOTICE. Is everything mentioned really bundled?
- NOTICE seems to contain too much information
- For long licenses it best to use a pointer the the full text of the license rather than include the full text" (JM)

  
5   
6   
7   
8   
9   
  • No labels