Schema namespace

http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200712

ASSEMBLY-1

Is binding.sca always present?

If a component service is configured with binding.ws, can be accessed by a component reference in the same composite with binding.sca?

ASSEMBLY-3

Is interface.java specification normative in SCA-Assembly spec?

No action is required

ASSEMBLY-5

component type allows to specify wire targets on references

Push teh getTargets() method from Reference to ComponentReference

ASSEMBLY-6

usage of not promoted references

Make sure the reference resolution follows what's described by the assembly spec

ASSEMBLY-8

SCDL artifact resolution underspecified

Adjust the artifact resolution based on the proposal in this JIRA

ASSEMBLY-14

Conflicting Specification of Values for Many-Valued StringProperties

Adjust the property value processing to conform to the new syntax

ASSEMBLY-16

Component URI is not well described

Tuscany needs to support the structural URI based on this proposal

ASSEMBLY-17

Need to define Namespace handling for included Composites

Tuscany needs to adjust how the composite include is aggregated based on the proposal in this JIRA

ASSEMBLY-18

XSD definitions of Component Service and Component Referencehave unintended features

ASSEMBLY-23

SCA <anyAttribute.../> declarations should use namespace ##other rather than ##any

Update the xsd from OASIS

ASSEMBLY-25

Can Implementation change property values after instantiaion

No action is required

ASSEMBLY-28

Missing XSD for contributions

Update the xsd from OASIS. Update the Import/Export model to
be extensible as the XSD allows xsd:any and xsd:anyAttribute

ASSEMBLY-32

"SCA schema fixes requested for sca-core.xsd (based on OSOA site versions that may be copied to OASIS site)"

ASSEMBLY-35

Confusing words in Section 5.3 relating to ConversationalIntent

ASSEMBLY-38

Clarify whether a Default Value for a Property must appear inthe componentType of an implementation

No action is required

ASSEMBLY-39

Permit intents and PolicySets on <interface/> elements

The policy model needs to be changed so that interface can have intents/policySets attached.

ASSEMBLY-40

Autowire at the domain level

Tuscany needs to decide if/how it will support the domain-level autowiring

ASSEMBLY-42

Autowire value for the logical domain composite

I think Tuscany is OK here as the autowire=false for the domain composite

ASSEMBLY-43

for implentations.*'s fix attributes that should show qnames as values

ASSEMBLY-57

Unresolved bindings on references

Add the support for "componentName/serviceName/bindingName" as the wire target

ASSEMBLY-67

Component Type file name is too restrictive

ASSEMBLY-68

ComponentType Properties should not have a source

ASSEMBLY-60

Description elements in SCDL

Support documentation element in the model and processors

ASSEMBLY-53

No schema or extension model definitions for contributions

ASSEMBLY-92

Assembly Specification should not state what marks a Javainterface as Local

ASSEMBLY-71

Implementation.composite pseudo-schema incorrect

ASSEMBLY-22

WSDL extension should not be required for conversations

Make sure conversational intent is supported at interface and service

ASSEMBLY-63

Specification wording unclear on how local and remoteable interfaces are specified

Remotable is IDL specific

ASSEMBLY-65

Constraining Type talks about non-optional references but does not define what they are

ASSEMBLY-77

How to map WSDL 1.1. portType to WSDL 2.0 interface and vice versa?

Remove the wsdl2.0 specfics from sca namespace. Potentially add interface.wsdl2 under tuscany ns

ASSEMBLY-69

Language neutrality edits

ASSEMBLY-45

some smaller things we need to fix in the assembly specification

ASSEMBLY-56

Need to clarify definition of Bidirectional Interfaces

Make sure Tuscany is consistent with the specified behavior

ASSEMBLY-41

Conflicting domain-level <wire> deployments

Tuscany needs to implement the proposal

ASSEMBLY-79

Identifying wire format and operation selection

add "wireFormat" and "operationSelector" for bindings

ASSEMBLY-62

What is the default value for many and mustSupply on Properties?

remove "mustSupply" from <component>

ASSEMBLY-26

SCA Composite Visibility

This seems to be a clarification by the spec

ASSEMBLY-51

Composite Completeness

Tuscany needs to add more validations to ensure the completeness of the composite for implementaiton.composite

ASSEMBLY-36

Compatability of component type side files

Each implementation type has to decide how to support the componentType file

ASSEMBLY-44

Allow multiple definitions.xml files

Tuscany should allow META-INF/definitions.xml from SCA contributions. These definitions become visible to the SCA domain

ASSEMBLY-30

Incorrect description of <Operation/> child elements inAssembly

I see this conflicts with  http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-58

ASSEMBLY-33

Long-Running Request-Response Operations

Tuscany needs to support the proposal

ASSEMBLY-72

Do we need appendix A (pseudo-schema)?

No action is required

ASSEMBLY-74

Corrections to the contributions schema

See ASSEMLY-28

ASSEMBLY-75

"Section on ""Wire"" in Appendix is Incorrect"

Tuscany already has the correct model, No action is required

ASSEMBLY-81

Duplicated atributes in sca-binding-sca.xsd and sca-implementation-composite.xsd

No action is required

ASSEMBLY-89

Need for a Callback annotation for WSDL interface files

Tuscany needs to handle sca:callback extensibility elements in WSDL

ASSEMBLY-96

Add a Section documenting naming conventions to the start ofthe SCA Assembly Specification

No action is required

JAVA-112

Spurious cast() method definition in ComponentContext interface

JAVA-111

Constructor name information may not be available

Adjust the @Property/@Reference processor on CDI

JAVA-84

Java CAA spec does not contain the interface.java schema

JAVA-83

Incorrect definition of the SCA JEE JSP Tag library

JAVA-82

Inconsistent use of a and an when referring to annotations

JAVA-81

Normative references to SCA Spec docs point to v1.00 docs

JAVA-79

Missing word "type" for "return type" in CAA spec - sec 3.1

JAVA-75

Incorrect description of @Scope annotation default

Make sure the scope is default to "COMPOSITE" if there is an @Conversational

JAVA-73

Incorrect reference to "original request"

JAVA-72

Should not say callback ID is passed in reference parameters

JAVA-71

Incorrect code in section 6.7.2 example

JAVA-64

SCA Spring C & I specification does not state the purpose of sca:composite element

Remove the sca:composite

JAVA-61

Describe the concurrency model for each scope

JAVA-57

SCA Spring Client and Implementation Specification uses an unacceptable namespace

Update the namespace based on the OASIS spec

JAVA-56

When more than one interface with the same unqualified name used in the @Service annotation

JAVA-55

SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define the ComponentType of a Java implementation

Check the compontType to see if it matches the rules defined by this proposal

JAVA-49

Version requirements for SDO, JAXB and JAX-WS

JAVA-48

@Callback annotation does not feature in section on Interfaces

JAVA-47

Missing description of what the @EagerInit annotation does

JAVA-43

@Reference annotation can also be used on a constructor parameter.

JAVA-42

Incorrect examples of methods annotated @Init and @Destroy

JAVA-41

Inconsistent method description for @Init and @Destroy annotations

Tuscany already validates the pattern

JAVA-32

Incorrect generated service name

JAVA-21

Clarify Request Scope lifetime

Remove the Request scope

JAVA-20

annotations on parameters

@Reference, @Property can only be used for constructor parameters. Tuscany
may need to report violations

JAVA-5

EJB remove method on EJBHome

POLICY-63

intents names defined by SCA should be defined using camel case

POLICY-61

How are mayProvide intents on bindings satisfied

POLICY-60

Clarify scope of ordered intent

Add "ordered" intent support

POLICY-59

Limit policySet attachment to bindings

POLICY-58

Remove <operation/> elements from the specification

POLICY-56

Intents which conflict with binding configuration

POLICY-55

Clarify the handling of Intents

POLICY-54

Wire validation rules have changed

POLICY-53

How do we tell what a policySet @provides?

POLICY-52

Policy algorithm gets required intents from what interfaces definitions/declarations?

POLICY-46

How to configure policySets

POLICY-44

Need a clear way to distinguish Implementation Intents from Interaction Intents

POLICY-42

Infoset for policySet/@appliesTo

POLICY-40

Fix SCA Policy schema complex types for Qualifier and PolicySet

POLICY-39

Need Support for Mutually exclusive intents

POLICY-38

Improve description of the overides available to the two different hierarchies in SCA

POLICY-37

The URL for the location of the ws-policy.xsd is incorrect.

POLICY-29

Need more precision on when policies in a policySet are in effect

POLICY-26

Security implementation policy should be validate-able by schema

POLICY-24

More direct, structural qualifier definition

POLICY-22

Profile intent extension - provides other intents

POLICY-18

Should qualifiable intents have a default qualifier

POLICY-17

Need Transaction Policy Spec

POLICY-15

External mechanism for attaching intents or policySets

POLICY-8

Include definition on 'conversational' intent as mentioned in SCA Assembly

POLICY-7

Implicit addition of intents based on a service or reference's @requires list

BINDINGS-38

Clarify use of URI vs. uri

BINDINGS-36

Does WSDL binding take precedend over policy intents

BINDINGS-35

Allow topics anywhere that queues can be used

BINDINGS-34

Clarify default function selection and data binding behavior

BINDINGS-33

Correlation property names are odd, and the space of options is not extensible.

BINDINGS-26

JMS binding pseudo-schemas inconsistent with assembly

BINDINGS-20

JMS binding URI should follow JMS IRI scheme submitted to IETF

BINDINGS-19

Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.binding with reference targets

BINDINGS-18

Clarify the rules on which queues are used for responses and callbacks

BINDINGS-17

Rules for Binding compatibility

BINDINGS-16

binding.ws reference to assembly spec for interface mapping is incorrect

BINDINGS-15

Namespace/location for WS-Addressing is incorrect in WebService binding spec/XSD

BINDINGS-13

What namespace(s) do we use for each binding?

BINDINGS-12

Are JMS message selectors supported?

BINDINGS-10

Rules for WSDL generation create invalid WSDL by using "/" where it is not allowed.

BINDINGS-9

Use of wsdli:wsdlLocation does not match WSDL 2.0 specification

BINDINGS-8

No bindingType for binding.ws

BINDINGS-6

JMS bindingType and conversation intent

BINDINGS-5

JMS bindingType and atLeastOne intent overlaps with setting JMSDeliveryMode

BINDINGS-3

portType referred to inconsistently throughout specification

BINDINGS-1

JMSDeliveryMode, JMSTimeToLive and JMSPriority defined as types different from what the JMS specification uses.

BPEL-20

SCA-BPEL spec can not require bpel:mustUnderstand to be true

BPEL-19

SCA-BPEL XML Schema

BPEL-17

Allow Component Type side file to override defaults for service/reference

BPEL-14

Allow sca-aware processes to specify everything that can be specified in a CT side file

BPEL-13

ComponentType should not contain implementation.bpel

BPEL-10

test issue please ignore

BPEL-9

SCA-BPEL XML Namespaces

BPEL-3

Correlation disagreement between SCA and BPEL

BPEL-2

Does the spec allow a componentType side file

BPEL-1

support for BPEL4WS 1.1