Current state: [One of "Under Discussion", "Accepted", "Rejected"]
Discussion thread:
JIRA or Github Issue:
Released: <Doris Version>
Google Doc: <If the design in question is unclear or needs to be discussed and reviewed, a Google Doc can be used first to facilitate comments from others.>
Cloud object storage is cheaper than multi replication local storage, thus we can put cold data to s3 to store much more data at lower price. To be more general, doris should not lose any feature due to putting cold data to s3.
There is an implementation migrating data to s3, https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/9197.
The specific approach to this implementation is:
1. Use schema change to generate cold data migration jobs to s3. This job is at the partition level.
2. Complete the data migration in the BE side by using similar logic as schema change.
Advantage:
1. The implementation is simple and the progress is controllable.
Because the same logic of schema change is adopted, the entire process has FE to achieve final control, and it can ensure that the atomic effect at the partition level is effective, and no intermediate state is generated.
Shortcoming:
1. load on cold data cannot be supported.
2. Cannot support schema change.
However, these two functions are strong requirements of users. We need to realize the tiered storage of data in cold and hot without affecting the complete functions of Doris.
The proposal aims to store cold rowsets in s3 without losing any feature, like updating and schema changing. The whole work can be divided into four parts.
Currently, Doris supports local data tiered storage, and its general approach is as follows:
In order to ensure compatibility with the current logic, and to keep the structure of the code clear. When implementing S3 storage, we use an additional set of strategies.
Along with the previous strategy, the new tiered storage strategy is as follows:
The Local is the current hierarchical storage implementation of HDD and SSD. The Remote refers to S3.
For the Local level, we keep the original strategy unchanged, that is, the partition-level hierarchical storage setting is still supported.
For the Remote level, we only support policy settings at the table level. However, the application granularity of this policy is still at the partition level. This way we can ensure that the strategy is simple enough.
First, user can create a storage policy and apply it to a table.
CREATE RESOURCE "storage_policy_name"
PROPERTIES(
"type"="storage_policy",
"cooldown_datetime" = "2022-06-01", // time when data is transfter to medium
"cooldown_ttl" = "1h", // data is transfter to medium after 1 hour
"s3_resource" = "my_s3" // point to a s3 resource
);
CREATE TABLE example_db.table_hash
(
k1 BIGINT,
k2 LARGEINT,
v1 VARCHAR(2048) REPLACE,
v2 SMALLINT SUM DEFAULT "10"
)
UNIQUE KEY(k1, k2)
DISTRIBUTED BY HASH (k1, k2) BUCKETS 32
PROPERTIES(
"storage_medium" = "SSD",
"sotrage_policy" = "storage_policy_name"
); |
When a cooldown_datetime is specified, cooldown_ttl is ignored.
Users can modify cooldown_datetime, cooldown_ttl, s3_ak, s3_sk of a storage policy, others attributed are not allowed to be modified. For simplicity, be refresh storage policy periodically to refresh ak sk.
A storage policy can be applied to multi tables. And user can simple modify one policy to apply to many tables.
A backend choose a rowset according to policy and migrate it to s3.
specific implementation steps and approximate scheduling.