This project is to improve the TrafficServer user interface to make it more accessible to new users and generally easier to work with.
All commands that users are expected to invoke should have manual pages. The manual pages should be up to date and accurate. Manual pages should be installed and shipped in source and binary distributions. The traffic_line subcommands should be coalesced into a single page. It's unlikely that anyone doing "man exit" is looking for the traffic_line subcommand.
Commands should be "self-documenting" as much as possible,\.
I haven't done any comparisons, but I need to verity that the existing commands have a consistent interface and use similar options. Users should be able to easily understand how to drive the various commands. Might be binary compatibility implications.
All content that users should not directly interact with should be in the $PATH. This means that commands like traffic_server should move to libexec.
I would like to rename some of the commands, eg. traffic_sac. This raises a binary compatibility problem that might not be surmountable. Generating consensus will be a problem
Are there opportunities to reduce the number of commands a TrafficServer user needs to know? For example, do we really need traffic_line and traffic_shell?
For example:
blacko:~ jpeach$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_shell [connect] ERROR (main_socket_fd 3): No such file or directory TSInit 5: Failed to initialize MgmtAPI in /opt/ats/var/trafficserver [connect] ERROR (main_socket_fd 23): No such file or directory % [connect] ERROR (main_socket_fd 25): No such file or directory [connect] ERROR (main_socket_fd 25): No such file or directory [connect] ERROR (main_socket_fd 25): No such file or directory ... |
Huh?