This page is meant as a template for writing a KIP. To create a KIP choose Tools->Copy on this page and modify with your content and replace the heading with the next KIP number and a description of your issue. Replace anything in italics with your own description.

Status

Current state: "Under Discussion"

Discussion thread: [here] 

JIRA: here 

Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

Kafka Streams has a set of configs with `default.` prefix. The intent for the default-prefix is to make a distinction between, well the default, and in-place overwrites in the code. Eg, users can specify ts-extractors on a per-topic basis.

However, for the deserialization- and production-exception handlers, no such overwrites are possible, and thus, `default.` does not really make sense, because there is just one handler overall. Via KIP-1033 we added a new processing-exception handler w/o a default-prefix, too.

Thus, we should consider to deprecate the two existing configs names and add them back w/o the `default.` prefix.

Public Interfaces

The below configs in org.apache.kafka.streams.StreamsConfig will be deprecated

Configs to be added to org.apache.kafka.streams.StreamsConfig

Proposed Changes

Describe the new thing you want to do in appropriate detail. This may be fairly extensive and have large subsections of its own. Or it may be a few sentences. Use judgement based on the scope of the change.

  1. Deprecate the below and create two new configs without prefix 'default.'

      2. Configs to be added to org.apache.kafka.streams.StreamsConfig

      3. Rename the below :

      4. Update all the relevant dependency classes and tests

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

The below configs will be marked for deprecation, and new configs will be introduced, and in later further releases, they could be removed

Test Plan

Describe in few sentences how the KIP will be tested. We are mostly interested in system tests (since unit-tests are specific to implementation details). How will we know that the implementation works as expected? How will we know nothing broke?

Rejected Alternatives

None