Current state: Under Discussion
Discussion thread: here [Change the link from the KIP proposal email archive to your own email thread]
JIRA:
Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).
Kafka Streams do not provide a way to easily trigger periodic callbacks at specific times. Wall-clock time punctuation allow to schedule periodic callbacks based on wall-clock time progress, but the punctuation time starts when the punctuation is scheduled. As a result, the callback is triggered at a non-deterministic time. It would be nice to allow a punctuation to be triggered at a fixed/anchored time, independent of when the punctuation was registered. For instance, this will allow for triggering a punctuation at the start of every hour, i.e. HH:00:00.
Real life use cases can be taken from the energy sector. The automatic closed loop balancing of the power grid requires calculations to be published at the start of every 10th second. Today, this is solved by a work-around utilising a "has published this interval" flag and a state store to ensure a punctuation is only triggered once per interval:
class PunctuateProcessor(
private val hasForwardedStoreName: String,
private val forwardTime: Duration,
) : ContextualProcessor<String, avro_value, String, avro_value>(),
ILogging by Logging<PunctuateProcessor>() {
private lateinit var hasForwardStore: WindowStore<String, Boolean>
private lateinit var forwardSchedule: Cancellable
private val hasForwardStoreKey = "hasPublished"
override fun init(context: ProcessorContext<String, avro_value>) {
super.init(context)
this.hasForwardStore = context.getStateStore(hasForwardedStoreName)
forwardSchedule =
context().schedule(Duration.ofMillis(500), PunctuationType.WALL_CLOCK_TIME) { forwardRecordsIfTime() }
}
override fun process(record: Record<String, avro_value>) {
// Store incoming records
}
private fun forwardRecordsIfTime() {
val currentTime = Duration.ofMillis(context().currentSystemTimeMs())
val flooredTime = Duration.ofMillis(floorTo10Second(currentTime.toMillis()))
if (isTimeToForward(currentTime) && !hasForwardedThisInterval(flooredTime)) {
forwardRecords()
hasForwardStore.put(hasForwardStoreKey, true, flooredTime.toMillis())
}
}
private fun isTimeToForward(currentTime: Duration): Boolean = (currentTime.toSecondsPart() % 10) >= (forwardTime.toSecondsPart() % 10)
private fun hasForwardedThisInterval(intervalStart: Duration): Boolean =
hasForwardStore.fetch(hasForwardStoreKey, intervalStart.toMillis()) ?: false |
Generally, the work-around can be characterised as flag-polling, where the poll frequency is determined by a wall-clock punctuation. Hence, the punctuation trigger time is also only as precise as the wall-clock punctuation trigger interval. A more frequent wall-clock punctuation will give a more precise trigger time at the cost of firing an increased number of flag checks. This is a trade-off that can be removed with the anchored punctuation.
Briefly list any new interfaces that will be introduced as part of this proposal or any existing interfaces that will be removed or changed. The purpose of this section is to concisely call out the public contract that will come along with this feature.
A public interface is any change to the following:
Binary log format
The network protocol and api behavior
Any class in the public packages under clientsConfiguration, especially client configuration
org/apache/kafka/common/serialization
org/apache/kafka/common
org/apache/kafka/common/errors
org/apache/kafka/clients/producer
org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer (eventually, once stable)
Monitoring
Command line tools and arguments
The anchored wall-clock punctuation will have similarities with that of triggering a cron job
Describe the new thing you want to do in appropriate detail. This may be fairly extensive and have large subsections of its own. Or it may be a few sentences. Use judgement based on the scope of the change.
Describe in few sentences how the KIP will be tested. We are mostly interested in system tests (since unit-tests are specific to implementation details). How will we know that the implementation works as expected? How will we know nothing broke?
If there are alternative ways of accomplishing the same thing, what were they? The purpose of this section is to motivate why the design is the way it is and not some other way.