Attendees:

Matteo, Enrico, JV, Charan, Sam, Kishore, Dustin Andrey, Bobby, Sijie, ...

 Discussion:

• Docker Image
  • multiple efforts on it (Matteo, Jia, Francesco)
  • goal: make a joint effort, discuss and come up with an approach for releasing an official BK image.
  • defer the discussion to email thread (or next meeting)
• Security Proposal - SSL Patch
  • The last pending patch is the SSL
  • Kishore merges all the changes from Enrico.
  • Authentication Framework vs TLS Approaches
  • Configurable settings to control whether TLS channel is only used for encryption, certificated authentication or both.
  • Uses JKS (preferred format), it is also configurable.
• Github Issue vs Jiras
  • JV: Prefer only one, either JIRA or Github issues.
  • Enrico: Github issues for new users, redirect users to JIRA
  • Matteo: move to Github issues. Make pull requests and github issues together for easy tracking.
  • Bobby: Github issue is pre-mature. There is only one Github issue. It is not worth moving to Github issues.
  • Proposal (JV):
    • Start using Github issues for a few months, to see how it works and decide?
    • Need to start a vote thread in the community (JV or Sijie will do this)
• Issues:
  • SSL: (see Security Proposal above)
  • Low-watermark Threshold
    • Sijie is fine with the pull request. But need more descriptions to clarify this change include refactor.
    • Charan will ping Bobby on the pull request for his review opinions
  • JMX Beans
    • The last change removed JMX beans because stats are exposed by stats providers now. No need for JMX beans.
    • Salesforce is using JMX beans for actions
    • Consensus:
      • not use JMX bean for stats
      • Charan contributes  the actionable beans back and make it configurable
      • Need a long term discussion on how to support these actions (e.g. http endpoint, jmx bean)
  • Multiple Entry Loggers
    • Charan sends the multiple entry logger design.

Open JIRA issues for 4.5.0:

Open Pull Requests:e

https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls

Discussion: