Status

Current state: Draft

Discussion thread: TBD

JIRA:

Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

Kafka transaction uses a two-phase model, where the transaction state is stored by transaction coordinator. As of current, the way to make it work is through AddPartitionToTxn call each time we see a new output partition. In reality though, the set of output partition for a producer doesn't change very often, or even deterministic over time, so it is a waste of network round trips to update that set unnecessarily.

The other issue is the infinite retry mechanism for AddPartitionToTxn when being served as the starting request for a new transaction. Right now the EndTxn call returns immediately when the txn commit message is materialized in transaction log. However broker needs to propagate this information to all the affected parties to complete the transaction, which means there is a black-out period that no more transaction could be started.

Proposed Changes

We propose to make AddPartitionToTxn a blocking call when there is other pending transaction going on. We would also like to retain a transaction session so that we don't need to call AddPartitionsToTxn all the time when a new partition is emerged.

Public Interfaces

Briefly list any new interfaces that will be introduced as part of this proposal or any existing interfaces that will be removed or changed. The purpose of this section is to concisely call out the public contract that will come along with this feature.

A public interface is any change to the following:

• Binary log format

• The network protocol and api behavior

• Any class in the public packages under clientsConfiguration, especially client configuration

  • org/apache/kafka/common/serialization

  • org/apache/kafka/common

  • org/apache/kafka/common/errors

  • org/apache/kafka/clients/producer

  • org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer (eventually, once stable)

• Monitoring

• Command line tools and arguments

• Anything else that will likely break existing users in some way when they upgrade

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

• What impact (if any) will there be on existing users?
• If we are changing behavior how will we phase out the older behavior?
• If we need special migration tools, describe them here.
• When will we remove the existing behavior?

Rejected Alternatives

If there are alternative ways of accomplishing the same thing, what were they? The purpose of this section is to motivate why the design is the way it is and not some other way.