Overview
Other MyFaces Extensions
- CODI
- Ext-Script
- [Orchestra]
- [Portlet Bridge]
The Intro page provides an overview and describes the motivation for the features described below. This page explains the most important APIs and mechanisms of the property validation module provided by ExtVal. Please note that this page doesn't show all possibilities. If you have any question, please contact the community!
The page ExtVal Modules provides an overview about ExtVal modules and how to add them to your project.
For using the features described in this page, you have to add the core and the property validation module for the JSF version you are using.
Required steps for using ExtVal:
That's it!
public class Person { @NotEquals("lastName") private String firstName; private String lastName; ... }
The rest is equivalent to the simple validation (just bind the properties to your input components).
Annotation |
Description |
---|---|
DoubleRange |
delegates to the implementation of |
JoinValidation |
to reuse (point to) annotations of a different property (see re-use existing annotations) |
Length |
delegates to the implementation of |
LongRange |
delegates to the implementation of |
Pattern |
use a regular expression for validation |
Required |
alternative to the required attribute |
SkipValidation |
allows to keep validation optional. (the annotations which are afterwards and support this mechanism) |
Validator |
generic validator to delegate validation to an existing jsf validator e.g.: |
JPA annotations are used automatically for UI validation as soon as you:
That's it!
(A simple demo is available here: demo_000)
Annotation |
Description |
---|---|
DateIs |
validates if a date is equal, before or after a second date |
Equals |
validates if two values are equal |
NotEquals |
validates if two values are different |
RequiredIf |
validates if a value is required depending on a second value (if it is empty or not) |
ExtVal has no special requirements for annotations. It's the responsibility of the validation strategy to know how to validate the annotation.
So you can use annotations within any layer without introducing an ExtVal dependency below the view layer.
If you would like to validate 3rd party annotations you can provide a mapping. With the same mechanism you can replace existing (ExtVal) validation strategies. Find detailed information below.
ExtVal provides the possibility to validate annotations with so called validation strategies.
The simplest case is to create a custom annotation and to use a name convention for the validator (= validation strategy).
The validation strategy has to implement the ValidationStrategy
interface. Or you can extend a class which implements this interface in-/directly. (A simple demo is available here: demo_002, demo_006)
Hint
If you don't like the default conventions, you can provide a custom name mapper, or you provide a mapping between annotations and the validation strategies (via properties file or ExtVal Java API), or ...
//my.custom.package.CustomConstraint @Target({METHOD, FIELD}) @Retention(RUNTIME) public @interface CustomConstraint { } //my.custom.package.CustomConstraintValidationStrategy public class CustomConstraintValidationStrategy implements ValidationStrategy { public void validate(FacesContext facesContext, UIComponent uiComponent, MetaDataEntry metaDataEntry, Object convertedObject) { //custom validation logic } }
That's just the simplest case. You can also use one of the other available name conventions or you can provide a custom convention or a custom name mapper or ...
Hint
It's recommended to use AbstractValidatorAdapter
or AbstractAnnotationValidationStrategy
instead of ValidationStrategy
.
In ExtVal r3+ validation strategies don't have to be aware of empty/null values. So it's safe to delegate to legacy JSF validators.
If a validation strategy should validate such values, it's possible to annotate the validation strategy with @NullValueAwareValidationStrategy
and/or @EmptyValueAwareValidationStrategy
.
If you don't like to use the name mapping concept, you can provide static mappings between annotations and validation strategies.
Use the convention for a mapping file ( org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator.custom.strategy_mappings.properties
) (it's customizable)
or use the ExtVal Java API:
Register a resource-bundle file which contains an annotation/validation strategy mapping:
StaticConfiguration<String, String> staticConfig = new StaticResourceBundleConfiguration(); staticConfig.setSourceOfMapping("[custom package + name of the properties file.]"); ExtValContext.getContext().addStaticConfiguration(StaticConfigurationNames.META_DATA_TO_VALIDATION_STRATEGY_CONFIG, staticConfig);
It's also used internally to provide the JPA based validation support. So you can find an example at the PropertyValidationModuleStartupListener
.
A similar approach is used internally by the annotation based config extension
This approach is more typesafe - a simple example:
StaticInMemoryConfiguration staticConfig = new StaticInMemoryConfiguration(); staticConfig.addMapping(CustomConstraint.class.getName(), CustomValidator.class.getName()); ExtValContext.getContext().addStaticConfiguration(StaticConfigurationNames.META_DATA_TO_VALIDATION_STRATEGY_CONFIG, staticConfig);
Hint
If you also don't like the approach above, you can implement your own ValidationStrategyFactory
to introduce your own concept.
It's possible to provide a validation strategy as Spring bean.
Use-cases:
<!-- The name of annotation: @CustomRequired --> <!-- Part of the Spring configuration: --> <bean id="customRequiredValidationStrategy" class="..." lazy-init="true"> <property name="messageResolver" ref="customMsgResolver"/> <property name="requiredValidationService" ref="demoRequiredValidationService"/> </bean> <bean id="customMsgResolver" class="org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator.core.validation.message.resolver.DefaultValidationErrorMessageResolver" lazy-init="true"> <!-- With JSF 1.2 you can use the var name of resource-bundle see faces-config.xml --> <property name="messageBundleVarName" value="messages"/> </bean> <bean id="demoRequiredValidationService" class="..."/>
The bean name follows the available name conventions.
(Also custom name conventions are supported.)
A simple demo is available here: demo_106
Furthermore, it's possible to provide a Meta-Data Transformer as Spring bean.