You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Status

Current state: Under Discussion

Discussion thread: here

JIRA:  Unable to render Jira issues macro, execution error.

Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

We'd like to support more complex configurations for some dynamically configurable options. The best way to describe these configurations is with a structured value like JSON or a nested list. It's possible to specify these configurations in server.properties, and to configure them in code with an AdminClient, but not using the CLI tools.

kafka-configs.sh currently makes it easy to set simple dynamic configs, but doesn't make it possible to set structured values more complex than a list. The current supported input for the --add-config option is:

Key Value pairs of configs to add. Square brackets can be used to group values which contain commas: 'k1=v1,k2=[v1,v2,v2],k3=v3'.

The implementation makes it impossible to set a value that contains commas (,)  and square brackets ([]) together and rules out structured formats like JSON.

Proposed Changes

We will add an option to kafka-configs.sh (ConfigCommand.scala) to accept a properties file and add the properties from the file.

Example usage with file
bin/kafka-configs --bootstrap-server localhost:9092 \
  --entity-type brokers --entity-default \
  --alter --add-config-file new.properties

Input from STDIN can be used instead of a file on disk.

Example usage with STDIN
grep 'code text
complex.property' server.properties | bin/kafka-configs --bootstrap-server localhost:9092 \
  --entity-type brokers --entity-default \
  --alter --add-config-file

Public Interfaces

We will add the --add-config-file option to kafka-configs.sh. It will be mutually exclusive with --add-config.

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

Since we're adding a new option to the command, existing use cases will be unaffected.

Rejected Alternatives

Allow specification of complex configs using --add-config

It would be possible to make the existing --add-config option do more sophisticated parsing of its input, for example to do brace matching. That would allow us to support things like JSON and nested lists:

bin/kafka-configs --bootstrap-server localhost:9092 \
  --entity-type brokers --entity-default \
  --alter --add-config 'k1={"key1":"val1","key2":"val2"},k2=[[1,2],[3,4]]'

However, there are several downsides to this. It quickly becomes unwieldy as the values being set become more complex. Shell escaping of various special characters becomes an issue. This also presupposes that the formats we want to support will have balanced braces.

Use multiple --add-config options, each with a single argument

We could remove the ambiguity of commas and square brackets by removing the current logic about splitting the configurations into key/value pairs. Setting multiple configs could be achieved by multiple calls to kafka-configs.sh or by allowing --add-config to be specified multiple times.

bin/kafka-configs --bootstrap-server localhost:9092 \
  --entity-type brokers --entity-default \
  --alter \
  --add-config k1=v1 \
  --add-config k2=v1,v2,v3 \
  --add-config k3=v3 \
  --add-config 'k4={"key1": "val1", "key2": "val2"}' \
  --add-config 'k5=[[1,2],[3,4]]'

However this would break existing multi-key uses of kafka-configs.sh.

Allow --add-config and --add-config-file at the same time

Instead of specifying that --add-config and --add-config-file are mutually exclusive, we could accept both. This creates ambiguity about what happens if a configuration is specified in both places. We could specify how this is resolved (eg. "keys supplied in --add-config take precedence over keys supplied in the file"), but this seems more complex than is warranted. Users can call kafka-configs.sh multiple times if they want to add configs from multiple sources.

Use a format other than a properties file for the configs

Since dynamic configurations are stored in ZooKeeper in JSON format, it might make sense to accept a JSON file in that same format. This seems like it is tying the implementation details too closely to the interface. Users already use properties files to specify configurations. Introducing a different format would add complexity.

  • No labels