Status

Current state: Under Discussion"

Discussion thread: here

JIRA: here

Released: <Kafka Version>

Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

The most expensive part of a Kafka cluster is probably its storage system. At LinkedIn we use RAID-10 for storage and set Kafka’s replication factor = 2. This setup requires 4X space to store data and tolerates up to 1 broker failure. We are at risk of data loss with just 1 broker failure, which is not acceptable for e.g. financial data. On the other hand, it is prohibitively expensive to set replication factor = 3 with RAID-10 because it will increase our existing hardware cost and operational cost by 50%.

The solution is to use JBOD and set replication factor = 3 or higher. It is based on the idea that Kafka already has replication across brokers and it is unnecessary to use RAID-10 for replication. Let’s say we set the replication factor = 4 with JBOD. This setup requires 4X space to store data and tolerate up to 3 broker failures in order not to lose any data. In comparison to our existing setup, this allows us to obtain 3X broker failure tolerance without increasing storage hardware cost.

We have evaluated the possibility of using other RAID setup in LinkedIn. But none of them addresses our problem as JBOD does. RAID-0 stops working entirely with just one disk failure. RAID-5 or RAID-6 has sizable performance loss as compared to RAID-0 and probably JBOD as well, due to their use of block-level striping with distributed parity.

Unfortunately, JBOD is not recommended for Kafka because some important features are missing. For example, Kafka lacks good support for tools as well as load balancing across disks when multiple disks are used. Here is a list of problems that need to be addressed for JBOD to be useful:

1) Broker will shutdown if any disk fails. This means a single disk failure can bring down the entire broker. Instead, broker should still serve those replicas on the good disks as long as there is good disk available.

2) Kafka doesn’t provide the necessary tools for users to manage JBOD. For example, Kafka doesn’t provide script to re-assign replicas between disks of the same broker. These tools are needed before we can use JBOD with Kafka.

3) JBOD doesn’t by itself balance load across disks as RAID-10 does. This will be a new problem for us to solve in order for JBOD setup to work well. We should have a better solution than round-robin which we are using to select disk to place a new replica. And we should probably figure out how to re-assign replicas across disks of the same broker if we notice load imbalance across disks of a broker.

For ease of discussion, we have separated the design of JBOD support into two different KIPs. This KIP address the first problem. See KIP - Support replicas movement between log directories for our proposal to address the second problem. 

Since Kafka configuration and implementation does not expose "disk", we will use log directory and disk interchangably in the rest of the KIP.

Goals

Proposed change

How to handle log directory failure

Problem statement:

Currently LeaderAndIsrRequest is used for two purpose: 1) create a new replica on a broker and 2) switch a replica between leader/follower of the partition. If a broker starts with some replicas unavailable because they are on a bad log directory, it will re-create those replicas on a good log directory when it receives LeaderAndIsrRequest from the controller. This is wrong. To avoid this, controller needs to know whether the replica has been created on the broker and explicitly specify whether broker should create replica in the LeaderAndIsrRequest.

Further, currently a replica is offline if and only if the broker hosting the replica is offline. This logic is no longer applicable with JBOD. Broker needs to explicitly tell controller the list of online replicas on its good log directories so that controller can elect leader from only online replicas. And admin tools should be developed to allow user to query which replicas are online or offline.

Solution:

The idea is for controller to keep track of weather a replica has been successfully created by getting this information from LeaderAndIsrResponse and persisting this information in the zookeeper. Then controller can explicitly tell broker whether to create replica or not by specifying a newly-added boolean field in the LeaderAndIsrRequest. Each broker can tell controller whether a replica is created and online by specifying the error_code per partition in the LeaderAndIsrResponse, which in turn allows broker to derive the offline replicas per partition and elect leader appropriately.

Here are a few clarification to make our solution easier to understand:
- Broker assumes a log directory to be good after it starts until there is IOException when broker attempts to access the log directory.
- Broker will be offline if all log directories are bad.

In the following we describe how our solution works under eight different scenarios. Some existing steps (e.g. kafka-topics.sh creates znode) are omitted for simplicity.

1. Topic gets created

- The controller creates znode /broker/topics/[topic]/partitions/[partitionId]/controller_managed_state with json-formatted data {"version" : 1, "created" : []} for this partition.
- The controller sends LeaderAndIsrRequest with create=True to the leader and followers.
- The leader and followers create replicas locally and sends LeaderAndIsrReponse to the controller with error=None.
- After receiving LeaderAndIsrResponse from leader and followers of this partition, the controller adds broker to the list "created" of this partition if error=None in LeaderAndIsrResponse. Otherwise, the replica is considered offline.

2. A log directory stops working on a broker during runtime

- The controller watches the path /log_dir_event_notification for new znode.
- The broker detects offline log directories during runtime.
- The broker notifies the controller by creating a sequential znode under path /log_dir_event_notification with data of the format {"version" : 1, "broker" : brokerId, "event" : LogDirFailure}.
- The controller reads the znode to get the brokerId and finds that the event type is LogDirFailure.
- The controller deletes the notification znode
- The controller sends LeaderAndIsrRequest to that broker to query the state of all topic partitions on the broker. The LeaderAndIsrResponse from this broker should tell the controller the list of partitions that are on the bad log directories.
- The controller updates the information of offline replicas in memory and trigger leader election as appropriate.
- The controller propagates the information of offline replicas to brokers by sending UpdateMetadataRequest.

3. Broker bootstraps with bad log directories

- Broker collects list of replicas found on the good log directories. If there is no good log directory the broker will exit.
- The controller sends LeaderAndIsrRequest for all partitions that should exist on this broker. If a replica is not in the created list of a partition, its create=True in the LeaderAndIsrRequest. Otherwise, its create=False.
- The broker will specify error=KafkaStorageException for those partitions that are in the LeaderAndIsrRequest with create=False but not found on any good log directory.
- The controller considers a replica on that broker to be offline if its error!=None in the LeaderAndIsrResponse.
- The controller updates the information of offline replicas in memory and triggers leader election as appropriate.
- The controller propagates the information of offline replicas to brokers by sending UpdateMetadataRequest.

4. The disk (or log directory) gets fixed

- The controller watches the path /log_dir_event_notification for new znode.
- User can either replace a bad disk with good disk, or remove the bad log directory from broker config.
- User restarts broker. Broker can read all log directories specified in its config.
- The controller sends LeaderAndIsrRequest with create=False to this broker because this replica has been created according to zookeeper.
- Broker will create replica on a good disk because it can access all log directories specified in the config. 

{
  "version" : int,
  "created" : [int]
}

{
  "version" : int,
  "broker" : int,
  "event" : int    <-- This can be LogDirFailure
}

LeaderAndIsrRequest => controller_id controller_epoch partition_states live_leaders
  controller_id => int32
  controller_epoch => int32
  partition_states => [LeaderAndIsrRequestPartitionState]
  live_leaders => [LeaderAndIsrRequestLiveLeader]
 
LeaderAndIsrRequestPartitionState => topic partition controller_epoch leader leader_epoch isr zk_version replicas
  topic => str
  partition => int32
  controller_epoch => int32
  leader => int32
  leader_epoch => int32
  isr => [int32]
  zk_version => int32
  replicas => [int32]
  create => boolean <-- NEW

UpdateMetadataRequest => controller_id controller_epoch partition_states live_brokers
  controller_id => int32
  controller_epoch => int32
  partition_states => [UpdateMetadataRequestPartitionState]
  live_brokers => [UpdateMetadataRequestBroker]
 
UpdateMetadataRequestPartitionState => topic partition controller_epoch leader leader_epoch isr zk_version replicas offline_replicas
  topic => string
  partition => int32
  controller_epoch => int32
  leader => int32
  leader_epoch => int32
  isr => [int32]
  zk_version => int32
  replicas => [int32]
  offline_replicas => [int32]  <-- NEW

MetadataResponse => brokers cluster_id controller_id topic_metadata
  brokers => [MetadatBroker]
  cluster_id => nullable_str
  controller_id => int32
  topic_metadata => TopicMetadata
 
TopicMetadata => topic_error_code topic is_internal partition_metadata
  topic_error_code => int16
  topic => str
  is_internal => boolean
  partition_metadata => [PartitionMetadata]
 
PartitionMetadata => partition_error_code partition_id leader replicas isr offline_replicas
  partition_error_code => int16
  partition_id => int32
  leader => int32
  replicas => [int32]
  isr => [int32]
  offline_replicas => [int32]  <-- NEW