You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

This page is meant as a template for writing a KIP. To create a KIP choose Tools->Copy on this page and modify with your content and replace the heading with the next KIP number and a description of your issue. Replace anything in italics with your own description.

Status

Current state[One of "Under Discussion", "Accepted", "Rejected"]

Discussion thread: here [Change the link from the KIP proposal email archive to your own email thread]

JIRA: KAFKA-16810 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

kafka-consumer-perf-test is a great tool to quickly check raw consumer performance. Currently, It subscribes to all the partitions and gives overall cluster performance, however If we want to test performance of single broker/partition, existing tool does not support. Single partition performance test is helpful in debugging and capacity/resource estimates.

For example, In one of the troubleshooting scenario on production we observed that our Spark Structured Streaming consumer was lagging because some of the tasks were taking longer. We observed that all tasks were reading from different partitions and amount of records to process were equal. However, fetch-time for some of the partitions were higher than the others. With modified kafka-consumer-perf-test we were able to confirm the same and we narrowed down problem to single broker having faulty switch. 

This modification allowed Hardware team to easily perform experiments and verify the resolution.

Public Interfaces

Briefly list any new interfaces that will be introduced as part of this proposal or any existing interfaces that will be removed or changed. The purpose of this section is to concisely call out the public contract that will come along with this feature.

A public interface is any change to the following:

  • Binary log format

  • The network protocol and api behavior

  • Any class in the public packages under clientsConfiguration, especially client configuration

    • org/apache/kafka/common/serialization

    • org/apache/kafka/common

    • org/apache/kafka/common/errors

    • org/apache/kafka/clients/producer

    • org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer (eventually, once stable)

  • Monitoring

  • Command line tools and arguments

  • Anything else that will likely break existing users in some way when they upgrade

Proposed Changes

Describe the new thing you want to do in appropriate detail. This may be fairly extensive and have large subsections of its own. Or it may be a few sentences. Use judgement based on the scope of the change.

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

  • What impact (if any) will there be on existing users?
  • If we are changing behavior how will we phase out the older behavior?
  • If we need special migration tools, describe them here.
  • When will we remove the existing behavior?

Test Plan

Describe in few sentences how the KIP will be tested. We are mostly interested in system tests (since unit-tests are specific to implementation details). How will we know that the implementation works as expected? How will we know nothing broke?

Rejected Alternatives

If there are alternative ways of accomplishing the same thing, what were they? The purpose of this section is to motivate why the design is the way it is and not some other way.

  • No labels