You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »


Document the state by adding a label to the FLIP page with one of "discussion", "accepted", "released", "rejected".

Discussion threadhere (<- link to https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@flink.apache.org)
Vote threadhere (<- link to https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@flink.apache.org)
JIRA

here (<- link to Unable to render Jira issues macro, execution error. )

Release1.18

Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).

Motivation

Flink redesigned the table source/sink interfaces as part of FLIP-95 and also added optional interfaces to support projection, partitions, filter push down etc to the table source. Currently, it doesn’t support nested fields filter push down. For eg:

 SELECT * FROM users WHERE user.age < 30

In the above example, the filter on the user.age is currently not pushed down to the table source assuming that the table source supports nested fields filters. The goal of this FLIP is to revise the SupportsFilterPushDown API to enable push down support for nested fields filters while maintaining backward compatibility with existing table sources.

Public Interfaces

Briefly list any new interfaces that will be introduced as part of this proposal or any existing interfaces that will be removed or changed. The purpose of this section is to concisely call out the public contract that will come along with this feature.

A public interface is any change to the following:

  • Binary log format

  • The network protocol and api behavior

  • Any class in the public packages under clientsConfiguration, especially client configuration

    • org/apache/kafka/common/serialization

    • org/apache/kafka/common

    • org/apache/kafka/common/errors

    • org/apache/kafka/clients/producer

    • org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer (eventually, once stable)

  • Monitoring

  • Command line tools and arguments

  • Anything else that will likely break existing users in some way when they upgrade

Proposed Changes

Describe the new thing you want to do in appropriate detail. This may be fairly extensive and have large subsections of its own. Or it may be a few sentences. Use judgement based on the scope of the change.

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

  • What impact (if any) will there be on existing users?
  • If we are changing behavior how will we phase out the older behavior?
  • If we need special migration tools, describe them here.
  • When will we remove the existing behavior?

Test Plan

Describe in few sentences how the FLIP will be tested. We are mostly interested in system tests (since unit-tests are specific to implementation details). How will we know that the implementation works as expected? How will we know nothing broke?

Rejected Alternatives

If there are alternative ways of accomplishing the same thing, what were they? The purpose of this section is to motivate why the design is the way it is and not some other way.

  • No labels