You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 34 Next »

Associated  JIRA ticket : SQOOP-1350 and its sub tickets for more granular discussion points

 

**The following details are relevant post 1.99.4 release, i,e from 1.99.5 onwards.

Intermediate Data Format(IDF)

Connectors have FROM and TO parts. A sqoop job represents data transfer between FROM and TO. IDF API represents how the data is represented as it flows between the FROM and TO via sqoop.  Connectors represent different data sources and each data source can have its custom/ native format that it uses. For instance MongoDb might use JSON as its optimal native format, HDFS can use plain CSV text, S3 can use its own custom format. In simple words, every data source has one thing in common, it is collection of rows and each row is a collection of fields / columns. Most if not all data sources have strict schema that tells what each field type is. 

IDF API provides 3 main ways to represent data that flows within sqoop 

  1. Native format - each row in the data source is a native object, for instance in JSONIDF, an entire row and its fields in sqoop will be represented as a JSON object, in AvroIDF, entire row and its fields will be represented as a Avro record
  2. CSV text format - each row and its fields are represented as CSV text
  3. Object Array format  - each field in the row is an element in the object array. Hence a row in the data source is represented as a object array. 
IntermediateDataFormat API
public abstract class IntermediateDataFormat<T> {
  protected volatile T data;
  public int hashCode() {
    return data.hashCode();
  }

  /**
   * Get one row of data.
   *
   * @return - One row of data, represented in the internal/native format of
   *         the intermediate data format implementation.
   */
  public T getData() {
    return data;
  }
  /**
   * Set one row of data. If validate is set to true, the data is validated
   * against the schema.
   *
   * @param data - A single row of data to be moved.
   */
  public void setData(T data) {
    this.data = data;
  }
  /**
   * Get one row of data as CSV text. Use SqoopDataUtils for reading and writing
   * into the sqoop specified CSV text format for each {@link #ColumnType} field in the row
   * Why a "native" internal format and then return CSV text too?
   * Imagine a connector that moves data from a system that stores data as a
   * serialization format called FooFormat. If I also need the data to be
   * written into HDFS as FooFormat, the additional cycles burnt in converting
   * the FooFormat to text and back is useless - so using the sqoop specified
   * CSV text format saves those extra cycles
   * <p/>
   * Most fast access mechanisms, like mysqldump or pgsqldump write the data
   * out as CSV, and most often the source data is also represented as CSV
   * - so having a minimal CSV support is mandated for all IDF, so we can easily read the
   * data out as text and write as text.
   * <p/>
   * @return - String representing the data in CSV text format.
   */
  public abstract String getCSVTextData();
  /**
   * Set one row of data as CSV.
   *
   */
  public abstract void setCSVTextData(String csvText);
  /**
   * Get one row of data as an Object array. Sqoop uses defined object representation
   * for each column type. For instance org.joda.time to represent date.Use SqoopDataUtils
   * for reading and writing into the sqoop specified object format
   * for each {@link #ColumnType} field in the row
   * </p>
   * @return - String representing the data as an Object array
   * If FROM and TO schema exist, we will use SchemaMatcher to get the data according to "TO" schema
   */
  public abstract Object[] getObjectData();
  /**
   * Set one row of data as an Object array.
   *
   */
  public abstract void setObjectData(Object[] data);
  /**
   * Set the schema for serializing/de-serializing  data.
   *
   * @param schema - the schema used for serializing/de-serializing  data
   */
  public abstract void setSchema(Schema schema);
  /**
   * Serialize the fields of this object to <code>out</code>.
   *
   * @param out <code>DataOuput</code> to serialize this object into.
   * @throws IOException
   */
  public abstract void write(DataOutput out) throws IOException;
  /**
   * Deserialize the fields of this object from <code>in</code>.
   *
   * <p>For efficiency, implementations should attempt to re-use storage in the
   * existing object where possible.</p>
   *
   * @param in <code>DataInput</code> to deseriablize this object from.
   * @throws IOException
   */
  public abstract void read(DataInput in) throws IOException;
}

NOTE: The CSV Text format and the Object Array format are custom to Sqoop and the details of this format for every supported column/field type in the schema are described below.

Design goals

There are a few prior documents that depict the design goals, but it is not crystal clear. Refer to this doc for some context on the research done prior to defining the IDF API. It explains some of the goals of using CSV and Object Array formats. Some of the design influence comes from the its predecessor Sqoop1.

  1. Support data transfer across connectors using an "internal" in memory data representation
  2. CSV is a common format in many databases and hence sqoop's design goals primarily want to optimize for such data sources. But it is unclear how much of performance gains does CSV text provide. 
    The following is a java doc comment I pulled from the code that explains the choice of CSV.

    Why a "native" internal format and then return CSV text too?
    Imagine a connector that moves data from a system that stores data as a
    serialization format called FooFormat. If I also need the data to be
    written into HDFS as FooFormat, the additional cycles burnt in converting
    the FooFormat to text and back is useless - so using the sqoop specified
    CSV text format saves those extra cycles
    <p/>
    Most fast access mechanisms, like mysqldump or pgsqldump write the data
    out as CSV, and most often the source data is also represented as CSV
    - so having a minimal CSV support is mandated for all IDF, so we can easily read the
    data out as text and write as text.

  3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1811 has discussions that detail the current IDF API design goals 


Schema ( a.k.a Row ) 

Schema represents a row of fields that are transferred between FROM and TO. Hence schema holds the list of column/ field types for that row. 

Schema
/**
 * Schema represents the data fields that are transferred between {@link #From} and {@link #To}
 */
public class Schema {
  /**
   * Name of the schema, usually a table name.
   */
  private String name;
  /**
   * Optional note.
   */
  private String note;
  /**
   * Creation date.
   */
  private Date creationDate;
  /**
   * Columns associated with the schema.
   */
  private List<Column> columns;
  /**
   * Helper set for quick column name lookups.
   */
  private Set<String> columNames;

Column & ColumnType ( a.k.a Row Fields )

Column is an abstraction to represent a field in a row. There are custom classes for sub type such as String, Number, Date, Map, Array. It has attributes that provide metadata about the column data such as is that field nullable?, if that field is a String, what is its maxsize?, if it is DateTime, does it support timezone?, if it is a Map, what is the type of the key and what the is the type of the value?, if it is Array, what is the type of the elements?, if it is Enum, what are the supported options for the enum?

/**
 * Base class for all the supported types in the Sqoop {@link #Schema}
 */
public abstract class Column {
  /**
   * Name of the column. It is optional
   */
  String name;
  /**
   * Whether the column value can be empty/null
   */
  Boolean nullable;
  /**
   * By default a column is nullable
   */

ColumnType is an handy enum that represents all the field types Sqoop supports. Note there is a umbrella UNKNOWN type for fields that sqoop does not support.

ColumnType
/**
 * All {@link #Column} types supported by Sqoop.
 */
public enum ColumnType {
  ARRAY,
  BINARY,
  BIT,
  DATE,
  DATE_TIME,
  DECIMAL,
  ENUM,
  FIXED_POINT,
  FLOATING_POINT,
  MAP,
  SET,
  TEXT,
  TIME,
  UNKNOWN,
  ;
}

The following is the spec as per 1.99.5, Please do not edit this directly in future. If there is format spec change in future releases add a new section to highlight what changed.

1.99.5 SQOOP CSV and Object Format

Column TypeCSV FormatObject Format
NULL value in the field

  public static final String NULL_FIELD = "NULL";

java null
ARRAY
  • Will be encoded as String (and hence enclosed with '\, inside there will be JSON encoding of the top level array elements (hence the entire value will be enclosed in [] pair), Nested values are not JSON encoded..
  • Few examples:
    • Array of FixedPoint '[1,2,3]'
    • Array of Text '["A","B","C"]'
    • Array of Objects of type FixedPoint '["[11, 12]","[14, 15]"]
    • Array of Objects of type Text ["[A, B]","[X, Y]"]' 

Refer https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1771 for more details

java Object[]
BINARY
byte array enclosed in quotes and encoded with ISO-8859-1 charsetjava byte[]
BIT

true, TRUE, 1

false, FALSE, 0

( not encoded in quotes )

Unsupported values should throw an exception

java boolean

DATE
YYYY-MM-DD ( no time)org.joda.time.LocalDate
DATE_TIME

YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:DD[.ZZZ][+/-XX] ( fraction and timezone are optional)

Refer https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1846 for more details

org.joda.time. DateTime

or

org.joda.time. LocalDateTime

(depends on timezone attribute )

DECIMAL
BigDecimal (not encoded in quotes )

java BigDecimal

ENUM
Same as TEXTjava String
FIXED_POINT
Integer or Long, ( not encoded in quotes )

java Integer

or

java Long

( depends on

byteSize attribute)

FLOATING_POINT
Float or Double ( not encoded in quotes )

java Double

or

java Float

( depends on

byteSize attribute)

MAP
  • Will be encoded as String (and hence enclosed with '\, inside there will be JSON encoding of the map (hence the entire value will be enclosed in  pair { }, nested values are also encoded as JSON
  • Map<Number, Number> '{1:20}'
  • Map<String, String> - '{"testKey":"testValue"}'


    Refer https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1771 for more details
java.util.Map<Object, Object>
SET
same as ARRAY

java Object[]

TEXT

Entire string will be enclosed in single quotes and all bytes will be printed as they are will exception of following bytes

Byte

Encoded as

0x5C

\ \ (no space) 

0x27

\'

0x22

\"

0x1A

\Z

0x0D

\r

0x0A

\n

0x00

\0

java String
TIME

HH:MM:DD[.ZZZ] ( fraction is optional )

3 digit milli second support only for time

org.joda.time.LocalTime ( No Timezone)
UNKNOWN
same as BINARYsame as java byte[]


Custom Implementations of IDF

CSV IDF - SQOOP-555 and SQOOP-1350

It is one of the sample implementation of the IDF API.

CSV IDF piggy backs on the the Sqoop CSV Format and its native format is the CSV Format represented as String. 

Talk about bad naming, this can be aptly called DefaultIntermediateDataFormat, since it defaults to the degenerate case of CSV.

See the implementation class in the connector-sdk package for more details

NOTE: It may not be obvious but the current IDF design expect every new implementation of it to expose the CSV an ObjectArray formats in addition to its native format.

SqoopIDFUtils 

It is a utility class in sqoop to aid connectors in encoding data into expected CSV format and object format and also parsing the CSV string back to the prescribed object format.

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1813

 

Open Questions related to the current IDF design

(Some of the below are some serious shortcomings of the current design as it exists)

  • The choice of using CSVText and ObjectArray as mandated formats for Sqoop IDF are influenced from the Sqoop 1 design, It favors some traditional fast dump databases but there is no real benchmark to prove how optimal it is vs using Avro or other formats for representing the data
  • Using  intermediate format might lead to discrepancies in some specific column types, for instance using JODA for representing the date time objects only gives 3 digit precision, where as the sql timestamp from JDBC sources supports 6 digit precision
  • More importantly SqoopConnector API has a getIDF..() method, that ties a connector to a  specific intermediate format for all the supported directions ( i.e both FROM and TO at this point) . This means the connector in both FROM and TO side has to provide this format and expect this format respectively. 
  • There are 3 different formats as described above in each IDF implementation, so each connector can potentially support one of these formats and that is not obvious at all when a connector proclaims to use a particular implementation of IDF such as CSVIntermediateDataFormat. For instance the GenericJDBCConnector says it uses CSVIntermediateDataFormat but chooses to write objectArray in extractor and readObjectArray in Loader. Hence it is not obvious what is the format underneath that it will read and write to. On the other hand, HDFSConnector also says it uses CSVIntermediateDataFormat but, uses only the CSV text format in the extractor and loader at this point. May change in future. 
  • A connector possibly should be able to handle multiple IDFs, and expose the supported IDFs per direction. It is not possible today, For instance a sqoop job should be able to dynamically choose the IDF for HDFSConnector when used in the TO direction. The job might be able to say, use AVRO IDF for the TO side and hence load all my data into HDFS in avro format. This means when doing the load, the HDFS will use the readContent API of the  SqoopOutputFormatDataReader. But today HDFS can only say it uses CSVIntermediateDataFormat and the data loaded into HDFS will need conversion from CSV to Avro as a separate step.
  • Assuming that every IDF support to implement a CSVText equivalent is a overkill. If at all we mandated to use CSV and ObjectArray as the 2 formats, we should have made IDF not an API, but in fact a standard implementation, it could have been further extended.  Imagine having to write a JSONIDF or a AvroIDF and still having to replicate the same logic that the default/degenerate CSVIntermediateDataFormat provides. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • No labels