Page History

...

1. People knowing only Jira will need to adapt to GH, easy stuff since it's supposed to be simpler to use in our acceptance.
2. Jira is maybe easier for not dev users to report. Though you can also report in GH[2]. It then offers the same possibilities than Jira (which adapted during its evolution) but we miss the feature (=> ask Infra)
3. Has GH tools alike elaborated search in Jira, e.g. with filters?
4. Will we miss tools like Dashboard, fancy graphs, etc? (I don't think so)
5. Jacopo's answer about [1.5] ([3] seems to be confirmed, it not possiblethe solution)

We are not using Jira to manage releases. But when we publish a new release
we update Jira versions to reflect the change. This information is useful
to group Jira tickets by version. I am not sure if there is a similar
feature in GH.

...

[0] Jira offers too much IMO, hence the contributor wiki page. Developers want to code (fun), not to report to managers (boring)
[1] https://rocketmq.apache.org/docs/pull-request/
[1.5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/OFBIZ/administer-versions?status=released-unreleased
[2] https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/creating-an-issue
[3] "gren" is a small helpful robot that will do for you just create a release from a tag and compile the release notes using issues or commits.