Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Each of these mechanisms has its own implementation, while none of them can guarantee consistency out of the box during network partitioning. This document suggests a design which that will eliminate duplicating logical pieces of code and provide robust building blocks for cluster metadata management and cache protocols.

...

  • SWIM [3], an eventually-consistent protocol widely used by multiple systems, with Java implementation available [4].
  • RAPID [5], a novel consistent group membership protocol, with Java implementation also available [6].

Cluster and node lifecycles

As described in IEP-55, nodes in a cluster rely on local and distributed metastorages during the operation. The following actions facilitate the usage of the metastorages:

  • Local metastorage initialization. This step is executed before the very first startup of any Ignite 3.0 node and may be implicit (the local metastorage is initialized with default settings in this case). Upon initialization, the local metastorage contains no information about the distributed metastorage.
  • Once a node starts, the discovery (group membership) starts working to maintain the list of online nodes.
  • Until the distributed metastorage is initialized, the nodes in a cluster remain in a 'limbo' state awaiting the distributed metastorage initialization.
  • Distributed metastorage is initialized either by an administrator command or using a pre-specified set of nodes. During the metastorage initialization, an initial metastorage Raft group is created.
  • All nodes record the last known configuration of the metastorage Raft group. If written, the node attempts to communicate with the distributed metastorage using the available configuration.
  • The changes in cluster membership do not directly affect the configuration of the distributed metastorage Raft group, nor the configuration of the partitions. Reported node unavailability via the cluster membership should be considered as a hint for other layers, but the Raft group can still try to periodically contact the unavailable member in an attempt to make progress under partial network partitions (since SWIM protocol is eventually consistent).
  • All nodes subscribe to the metastorage update feed which delivers updates to the distributed metastorage as a linearizable consistent sequence of distributed metastorage modifications. Along with the metastorage Raft group configuration changes, it contains the changes to the cluster configuration (such as the list of caches, their configuration, partitions assignment, etc). Each node reacts to the changes from the distributed metastorage by adjusting the local configuration and performing corresponding actions (creating/destroying tables, moving partitions, etc).
  • If one or more of the nodes from the metastorage Raft group goes offline, but the Raft group remains available (a majority of the nodes are online), the cluster remains available. The metastorage group can be reconfigured to include a new member (to mitigate the risk of further unavailability) either automatically (similar to baseline auto-adjust), or manually by the administrator command.
  • If the number of offline nodes in the metastorage Raft group is larger than the quorum, the metastorage becomes unavailable. Further configuration changes to the cluster start to temporarily fail, but table operations keep working as long as corresponding partitions are available. Once the majority of the metastorage Raft group becomes available, the changes to the cluster configuration become available as well.
  • If more than the majority of the metastorage Raft group members are permanently lost, it is impossible to restore the metastorage availability without potential data loss. In this case, the cluster is moved to the recovery mode and the metastorage Raft group is re-initialized using one of the available members as the 'golden source'.

Application to caches protocol

...