THIS IS A TEST INSTANCE. ALL YOUR CHANGES WILL BE LOST!!!!
...
ID | IEP-46 | ||||||||
Author | |||||||||
Sponsor | |||||||||
Created |
| ||||||||
Status |
|
Table of Contents |
---|
...
There 20 benchmarks totally were made (10 with the one-operation approach and 10 with the two-operations approach).
Results:
tps 1, op/sec, AVG | latency 1, nsec, AVG | tps 2, op/sec, AVG | latency 2, nsec, AVG | delta tps | delta latency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
390113 | 2625103 | 393930 | 2600288 | 0,98% | -0,95% |
383307 | 2671531 | 370831 | 2762661 | -3,25% | 3,41% |
378431 | 2706381 | 382540 | 2678767 | 1,09% | -1,02% |
372316 | 2750314 | 377884 | 2711388 | 1,50% | -1,42% |
383258 | 2672952 | 380790 | 2689943 | -0,64% | 0,64% |
381941 | 2681639 | 398006 | 2573471 | 4,21% | -4,03% |
378778 | 2703999 | 379971 | 2695359 | 0,31% | -0,32% |
374484 | 2735758 | 380260 | 2694853 | 1,54% | -1,50% |
379535 | 2698315 | 375098 | 2731863 | -1,17% | 1,24% |
374196 | 2737032 | 373018 | 2746522 | -0,31% | 0,35% |
Conclusion: there is almost no difference between the one-operation approach and the two-operations approach (about 1% on average), so there is no reason to implement two-operations approach. Single-operation approach should be implemented as more convenient from the user's point of view.
...