Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

This KIP is aimed at improving the error-handling semantics in Kafka Streams when Kafka Steams fails to produce a message to the downstream sink by providing an interface that can provide custom massaging of the error (e.g. report to a custom metrics system) and indicate to Streams whether or not it should re-throw the Exception, thus causing the application to fall over.

Status

Current state: Under Discussion Adopted (1.1.0)

Discussion thread: Click here

...

We'll implement the following error handling logic to the onCompletion handler in RecordCollectorImpl and to the try statement that wraps it:

  1. If the Exception that is thrown is a ProducerFencedException, behave as we do today and do not invoke the ProductionExceptionHandler as these exceptions are self-healing.
  2. If the Exception that is thrown is fatal will affect all records and should cause Streams to always fail. If so, then do not invoke the ProductionExceptionHandler because its result will have to be ignored. We should log that we're ignoring these exceptions at DEBUG level.
    1. The exceptions that meet this classification are:
      1. AuthenticationException
      2. AuthorizationException
      3. SecurityDisabledException
      4. InvalidTopicException
      5. UnknownServerException
      6. IllegalStateException
      7. OffsetMetadataTooLarge
      8. SerializationException
      9. TimeoutException when it occurs immediately on send due to a full buffer

  3. If the Exception that is thrown meets neither of the above conditions, determine if sendException is already set. If so, do not invoke the ProductionExceptionHandler because this would mean that we've already invoked it and decided to FAIL. Invoking it again would just result in an ignored result.
  4. If none of the conditions above is met, invoke the handle method in the ProductionExceptionHandler and check the result.
    1. If the result is CONTINUE, log a note at DEBUG that we received that result and are not failing Streams as a result. This ensures that it's not possible for a client developer to ship code that totally swallows errors without presenting any kind of activity in the log.
    2. If the result is FAIL, log a message at ERROR that we received that result and set sendException so Streams will fail.

The error handler will only be invoked for exceptions that are returned via the producer callback, and will not be invoked for Exceptions thrown directly from send as all of those exceptions should be seen by Streams immediately.

These changes will facilitate a number of error handling scenarios. For example, one could choose to write an interface that always fails, but does some additional logging in the process:

...