ID | IEP-45 |
Author |
Sponsor |
Created |
| |||
Status |
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
---|
The main goal is to have a cache operation's latency less than 500 ms on node fail/left.
Currently, latency can be increased to seconds or even dozens of seconds.
The task can be split into the following threads:
The Switch is a process that allows performing cluster-wide operations that lead to a new cluster state (eg. cache creation/destroy, node join/left/fail, snapshot creation/restore, etc).
...
It's possible to avoid PME on node left if partition distribution is fixed (eg. baseline node left on a fully rebalanced cluster).
This optimization will allow us to continue operations (not affected by primary node failure) during or after the switch.
...
In case nodes combined into virtual cells where, for each partition, backups located at the same cell with primaries, it's possible to finish the Switch outside the affected cell before tx recovery finish.
This optimization will allow us to start and even finish new operations without waiting for a cluster-wide Switch finish.
...
Some Already found that some constants used at failure detection are hardcoded and large.
The Also, code responsible for this feature performs a lot of re-checks and re-waits and you may have detection time close to failureDetectionTimeout x2 or even x3.
GC Another problem is GC, and it may increase failure detection dramatically, so, watchdog started from another JVM or from native code can help here.
While node in STW it can't let cluster know it exceeds possible STW duration.
Also, the node may start operating after the STW exceeding, this may cause additional performance degradation.
A good case is to detect GC time locally (i.e. using JVMTI agent) and kill the node in case of exceeding.
...
Zookeeper or similar coordinator should be used.
Current implementation of ZookeeperDiscoverySpi
should be rewritten, because Zookeeper and similar coordinators (i.e. etcd) are not intended to store large amount of data.
TCP transport for delivering messages should be implemented and leave Zookeeper only coordination, service discovery and similar tasks.
Local checks provide non-relevant results. Real cluster checks may be non-reproducible.
To develop, check and be able to recheck fixes related to "Crash recovery speed-up" we should write a framework that allows us to create reproducible tests that can be performed in a real environment.
A possible solution is to use the Ducktape framework.
Forked to IEP-56: Distributed environment tests.
// Describe project risks, such as API or binary compatibility issues, major protocol changes, etc.
// Links to discussions on the devlist, if applicable.Active nodes aliveness WatchDog discussion
// Links to various reference documents, if applicable.
...
Jira | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...