Incomplete
This table is a work-in-progress and should considered neither complete nor correct at this point.
Join In
I have started a thread about this table on the dev mailing list - "0.6 Feature Matrix". Let us know what you think!
AMQP Interoperability
Brokers | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C++ | Java | ||||
Linux | Windows | * | |||
Clients | C++ | Linux | 0-10 | 0-10 | 0-10 |
Windows | 0-10 | 0-10 | 0-10 | ||
JMS | * | 0-10 | 0-10 | 0-8 0-9 0-10 |
|
Python | * | 0-10 | 0-10 | 0-8 0-9 0-10 |
|
Ruby | * | 0-10 | 0-10 | 0-8 0-9 0-10 |
|
WCF | Windows | 0-10 | 0-10 | 0-8 0-10 |
Feature Interoperability
Feature Interoperability
We need a matrix which addresses feature interoperability across implementations. For instance, if the Java broker has clustering, will the JMS client support cluster failover on a C++ broker? (and visa versa). What about Python and Ruby?