You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Annotations - Lifecycle

A component has a lifecycle that controls when it is started or stopped. A bundle must be started before the DM Runtime can process its components. When the bundle is started, the DM Runtime will parse a specific DependencyManager-Component manifest headers, which points to a list of descriptors defining all annotated components. Such descriptors are actually generated at compilation time, and annotation are not reflectively parsed at runtime. Only the descriptor is used to process the components. For each component, the DM Runtime first ensures that all dependencies are satisfied before activating it. Likewise, the component is deactivated when some of the required dependencies are not available anymore or when the bundle is stopped. Unless the bundle is stopped, components may be deactivated and reactivated, dependending on the departure and arrival of required dependencies. The manager which is in charge of maintaining the state of components is implemented in the DM Runtime bundle (org.apache.felix.dm.runtime bundle).

Lifecycle Callbacks

Component Activation

Activating a component consists of the following steps:

  1. Wait for all required dependencies to be available. When all required dependencies are available:
    1. Instantiate the component.
    2. Inject all required dependencies (on class fields using reflection, or by invoking callback methods).
    3. Inject all optional dependencies defined on class fields, possibly with a NullObject if the dependency is not available.
    4. Call the component init method (annotated with @Init). In the Init method, you are yet allowed to add some additional dependencies (but using the API). Alternatively, you can also configure some dependencies dynamically (explained later, in #Dynamic Dependency Configuration).
  2. Wait for extra dependencies eventually configured from the init() method.
  3. If the component is not using the @LifecycleController annotation (detailed in the #Controlling the Lifecycle section), then:
    1. Invoke the component start method (annotated with @Start).
    2. Publish eventual OSGi services (if the component provides some services).
    3. Start tracking optional dependencies applied on method callbacks (useful for the whiteboard pattern).
  4. Else do nothing because  the component will trigger itself the startup using the lifecycle controller.

Component Deactivation

Deactivating a component consists of the following steps:

  1. If the bundle is stopped or if some required dependencies are unavailable, Invoke the stop method (annotated wit @Stop), and unregister eventual OSGi services (if the components provides some services). Any optional dependency unavailability does not trigger the component deactivation, and the removed callbacks are just invoked, if declared in the annotation.
  2. invoke destroy method (annotated with @Destroy)
  3. invoke removed dependency callbacks, if any

Example

The following example show a basic service, which uses the @Start, @Stop, annotation:

/**
 * A Service Using lifecyce callbacks
 */
@Service
class X implements Y {
    @ServiceDependency
    void bindOtherService(OtherService other) {
       // Will be injected before we are started (because it's a required dependency).
    }

    @Start
    void publishing() {
        // All required dependencies are injected: initialize. Once we return, the service will be published
        // in the OSGi registry.
    }

    @Stop
    void unpublished() {
       // We are not registered anymore in the OSGi registry.
    }
}

Dynamic Dependency Configuration

Rationale

We have seen that a component may declare some dependencies and is started when all required dependencies are available. But there are some cases when you may need to define some dependencies filters dynamically, possibly from data picked up from other dependencies (like a configuration dependency for instance).

So, all this is possible using named dependencies: When you assign a name to a dependency; for instance @ServiceDependency(name="foo"), then this has an impact on how the dependency is handled. Indeed, all named dependencies are calculated after the @Init method returns. So from your @Init method, you can then configure your named dependencies, using data provided by already injected dependencies.

To do so, your @Init method is allowed to return a Map containing the filters and required flags for each named dependencies. For a given named dependency, the corresponding filter and required flag must be stored in the Map, using the "filter" and "required" keys, prefixed with the name of the dependency.

For instance, if you define a Dependency like this:

@ServiceDependency(name="foo")
FooService fooService;

Then you can return this map from your @Init method:

@Init
Map init() {
    return new HashMap() {{
        put("foo.filter", "(foo=bar)");
        put("foo.required", "false");
    }};
}

So, after the init method returns, the map will be used to configure the dependency named "foo", which will then be evaluated. And once the dependency is available, then your @Start callback will be invoked.

Usage example:

This is an example of a service X whose dependency "foo" filter is configured from ConfigAdmin. First, we defined a ConfigurationDependency in order to get injected with our configuration. Next, we define a dependency on the FooService, but this time, we declare the annotation like this: @ServiceDependency(name="foo"). As explained above, The ConfigurationDependency will be injected before the @Init method, but the named dependency ("foo") will be calculated after the @Init method returns. So, from our Init method, we just return a map which contains the filter and required flag for the "foo" dependency, and we actually use the configuration which has already been injected:

/**
 * A Service whose FooService dependency filter is configured from ConfigAdmin
 */
@Service
class X {
    private Dictionary m_config;

    /**
     * Initialize our service from config ... and store the config for later usage (from our init method)
     */
    @ConfigurationDependency(pid="MyPid")
    void configure(Dictionary conf) {
         m_config = config;
    }

    /**
     * All unnamed dependencies are injected: we can now configure other named
     * dependencies, using the already injected configuration.
     * The returned Map will be used to configure our "foo" Dependency (see below)
     */
    @Init
    Map init() {
        return new HashMap() {{
            put("foo.filter", m_config.get("filter"));
            put("foo.required", m_config.get("required"));
        }};
    }

    /**
     * This named dependency filter/required flag will be configured by our init method (see above).
     */
    @ServiceDependency(name="foo")
    FooService fooService;

    /**
     * All dependencies are injected and our service is now ready to be published.
     */
    @Start
    void start() {
    }
}

Controlling the Lifecycle

As explained in the Component Activation section, a component which provides a service is automatically registered into the OSGi registry, after the @Start method returns. But it is sometimes required to control when the service is really started/published or unpublished/stopped.

This can be done using the @LifecycleController annotation. This annotation injects a Runnable object that can be invoked once you want to trigger your service startup and publication.

For instance, imagine that your component publishes an OSGi service, but before, it needs to register into a DHT (Distributed Hash Table), whose API is asynchronous: that is: the DHT API will callback you once you are inserted into a node in the DHT. In this case, what you would like to do is to publish your OSGi service, but only after you are inserted into the DHT (when the DHT callabacks you) ... Such a case is supported using the @LifecyceController annotation, which gives you full control of when your component is started/stopped.

Let's illustrate this use case with a concrete example: First here is the DHT asynchronous API:

/**
 * This is an element which can be inserted into the distributed hash table.
 */
public interface DHTElement {
   void inserted(); // callback used to notify that the element is inserted into the DHT
}

/**
 * This is the DHTService, which registers a DHTElement asynchronously.
 */
public interface DHTService {
   void insert(DHTElement element); // will callback element.inserted() later, once registered into the DHT.
}

Next, here is our service, which uses the @LifecycleController in order to take control of when the service is published into the OSGi registry:

@Service(provides={MyService.class})
public class MyServiceImpl implements MyService, DHTElement {
    @ServiceDependency
    DHTService dht;

    @LifecycleController
    Runnable trigger; // will fire component startup, once invoked.

    @Init
    void init() {
        dht.insert(this); // asynchronous, will callback us in our inserted method once registered into the DHT
    }

    void inserted() {
        // We are inserted into the DHT: we can now trigger our component startup.
        // We just invoke the runnable injected by our @LifecycleController annotation, which will trigger our
        // service publication (we'll be called in our @Start method before)
        trigger.run();
    }

    @Start
    void start() {
        // method called only once we invoke our trigger Runnable (see inserted method).
        // Our Service will be published once this method returns.
    }
}

Dynamic Service Properties

When a component provides an OSGi Service, the service properties are calculated as the following:

  • Any properties specified in the @Service annotation are used to provide the OSGi Service
  • Any properties provided by a FactorySet are also inserted in the published service
  • Any Dependency whose propagate attribute is set to true will also insert its properties to the published service

But there is also a use case where your own component might want to dynamically specify the list of properties which should be also inserted in the published service, and you can do this by returning an optional Map from your @Start callback method. For instance:

@Service(properties={@Property(name="foo", value="bar")})
public class MyServiceImpl implements MyService {
    @ConfigurationDependency(pid="MyPid", propagate=true)
    void updated(Dictionary conf) {
       // "conf" contains foo2=bar2, for example, and since we have set the "propagate" attribute to true, then
       // the property will be propagated to our published service ...
    }

    @Start
    Map start() {
        // Return some extra properties to be inserted along with our published properties. This map takes
        // precedence, and may override some properties specified in our @Service annotation, or some properties
        // propagated from our @ConfigurationDependency dependency ...
        return new HashMap() {{ put("foo3", "bar3"); }};
    }
}

Here, the service MyService will be published into the OSGi registry along with the following service properties:

  • foo=bar (specified in our @Service annotation)
  • foo2=bar2 (propagated by our ConfigurationDependency dependency)
  • foo3=bar3 (specified dynamically in the map returned from our start method)

Notice that properties returned by the Map takes precedence over other properties, and may override some of them.

  • No labels