You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 51 Next »

Current state: Under Discussion

Discussion thread: here

JIRA: Unable to render Jira issues macro, execution error. Unable to render Jira issues macro, execution error.

Motivation

Kafka Streams enforces a strict non-null-key policy in the DSL across all key-dependent operations (like aggregations and joins).
 For left-joins, it makes sense to still accept a `null`, and add the left-hand record with an empty right-hand-side to the result.
Similarly, for outer-joins it makes sense to keep the record.
The defined semantics for left/outer join are: keep the stream record if no matching join record was found.
Thus, Kstreams today's behavior is inconsistent with the defined semantics.

Public Interfaces / Proposed Changes

This KIP won't change any public interfaces. However, it will change the behavior of the following:

Operators

  • left join Kstream-Kstream: no longer drop left records with null-key and call ValueJoiner with 'null' for right value.
  • outer join Kstream-Kstream: no longer drop left/right records with null-key and call ValueJoiner with 'null' for right/left value.
  • left-foreign-key join Ktable-Ktable: no longer drop left records with null-foreign-key returned by the ForeignKeyExtractor and call ValueJoiner with 'null' for right value.
  • left join KStream-Ktable: no longer drop left records with null-key and call ValueJoiner with 'null' for right value.
  • left join KStream-GlobalTable: no longer drop left records with null-key and call KeyValueMapper with 'null' for left  key. The case where KeyValueMapper returns null is already handled in the current implementation.

Repartition of null-key records

Currently, repartitioning causes records with 'null'-keys to be dropped.
This behavior needs to be changed.
The above described change in behavior would otherwise not work for topologies with repartitioning.
Going forward, they will be sent to an arbitrary partition.

Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan

Keeping the old behavior

Users who want to keep the current behavior can prepend a .filter() operator to the aforementioned operators and filter accordingly.

Examples
//left join Kstream-Kstream
leftStream
    .filter((key, value) -> key != null)
    .leftJoin(rightStream, (lv, rv) -> join(lv, rv), windows);

//outer join Kstream-Kstream
rightStream
    .filter((key, value) -> key != null);
leftStream
    .filter((key, value) -> key != null)
    .outerJoin(rightStream, (lv, rv) -> join(lv, rv), windows);

//left-foreign-key join Ktable-Ktable
Function<String, String> foreignKeyExtractor = leftValue -> ...
leftTable
    .filter((key, value) -> foreignKeyExtractor.apply(value) != null)
    .leftJoin(rightTable, foreignKeyExtractor, (lv, rv) -> join(lv, rv), Named.as("left-foreign-key-table-join"));

//left join Kstream-Ktable
leftStream
    .filter((key, value) -> key != null)
    .leftJoin(ktable, (k, lv, rv) -> join(lv, rv));

//left join KStream-GlobalTable
KeyValueMapper<String, String, String> keyValueMapper = (k, v) -> ...;
// The case where the KeyValueMapper returns null is already handled.
// What changes is that the KeyValueMapper might be called with null for the key 'k'.
leftStream
    .filter((key, value) -> key != null)
    .leftJoin(globalTable, keyValueMapper, (lv, rv) -> join(lv, rv));
Remarks

Note that the above list of operator examples is not exhaustive.
E.g. There is only one example with a 'ValueJoinerWithKey'. All other examples pass a 'ValueJoiner' into the operator.


We will hint to the DSL users via Java docs that they have now have the option to distinguish between the following scenarios within a left join operator:
"null-key" v.s. "not-null-key but null-value" by passing a 'ValueJoinerWithKey' instead of 'ValueJoiner' to the left join operator.
The remark will be made in the Java docs of all left join methods with a 'ValueJoiner' as a parameter.


As part of this KIP the above information on how to keep the old behavior will also be documented here: https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/streams/upgrade-guide
Plus, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Streams+Join+Semantics and https://kafka.apache.org/35/documentation/streams/developer-guide/dsl-api.html#joining will be updated accordingly.

Why not make this change opt in?

By default we would like the behavior of a stream defined via DSL to be consistent with the defined semantics.



  • No labels